Got access to the January 6 unreleased video uh 40 000 hours you know it’s a process of requesting Clips so you know we’re getting clip by clip but we’ve compiled a good number of them into uh what really I think shows a good picture of what happened that day
Uh we’ll be airing that one tomorrow and we might have more coming as well that’s let’s jump into the first story I’ll show you a trailer again after this segment but let me jump into the first story which is about how the how the FBI was actually lying uh it
Turns out Christopher Ray may have actually lied about this well it seems he has uh Christopher head of the FBI they were targeting Catholics they were targeting Catholics as domestic terrorists now Christopher Ray previously said that they weren’t they weren’t doing it as the FBI as a whole
There was one small office one you know one area that was doing it uh that had labeled Catholics as domestic terrorists it was limited it did not represent all of what they were doing it turns out that was a lie the FBI was coordinating across multiple multiple departments uh
To label and Target traditional Catholics in America as domestic terrorists let me show you what what the house Judiciary GOP says they say this on Twitter first subpoenaed documents reveal reveals the FBI Richmond field office coordinated with multiple field offices across the country to produce MMO targeting traditional Catholics as domestic
Terrorists Rey is an FBI director Christopher Ray previously said the actions were limited to a single field office turns out he lied um the attached document on there I’ll read a bit of what it says it says the committee on the Judiciary is continuing to conduct oversight of the Federal
Bureau of Investigation fbis assessment of traditional Catholics as potential domestic terrorists from information recently produced to the committee the house Judiciary Committee we now know that the FBI relied on information from around the country including a liaison contact in the FBI’s Portland field office ironically home to
Some of the most radical people around and Reporting from the FBI’s Los Angeles field office also a very extreme area to develop its assessment now why might they label Catholics as potential domestic terrorists or domestic extremists it’s because they were framing Catholics along the same lines of you know white supremacists and
They were doing this as well to some Christian groups if you were a Christian certain sects of Christianity were also being labeled and investigated as domestic terrorists by other groups the military for example had reports like this why is that it’s because the way they’re redefining things is this they’re saying
Basically that anybody who criticizes the policies of the left is a potential extremist if you disagree with homosexuality which most religions do by the way I I can’t think of any traditional religion that supports it um Mo you know of course modern modern interpretations are different you do
Find sex these days that that follow that most of that by the way comes around from the I’d say the the occult subversion of most religions by the antonym antonomicalist movement which I can explain if you all want to hear about it uh and and an anti-moral movement that swept the world
Um which has actually in my opinion subverted most religions by now uh and unfortunately it’s a morality of anti-morality is what it represents a lot of religions don’t believe in Morality anymore a lot of them don’t they don’t believe that being good or doing good deeds or cultivating virtue they don’t believe it
Matters um and you find this and there’s certain sex in most religions now that have adopted these ideas it actually comes from an occult movement it’s the actual term for it was the anti-nominalists um but you do find that that has kind of snowballed into a lot of the problems we
Have these days where we we’re facing an anti-moral movement morality is no longer defined as in terms of what’s good and what’s evil it’s no longer defined as you know virtue in traditional morality as being the beacon of what defines goodness now what defines goodness is you know do as thou
Wilt you know be free indulge as you would like God will forgive you right that’s the whole idea do whatever you want I do think God will forgive you but I don’t I think you need to make some effort on your part too personally um
But the way that evil is now defined is no longer the violation of religious tenets and the revi the violation of moral standards but instead if you question the morality of people who indulge and so it evil is no longer if you indulge in sexuality it’s if you criticize people who indulge in
Sexuality evil is no longer if you indulge in let’s say if you’re you know in this case for example talking about homosexuality it’s if you oppose that so if you have a moral standard you’re defined as Evil by the anti-nominalist system which is overtaken most modern
Systems of Law and also overtaken a lot of the I’d say woke interpretations of modern religions uh it’s a very it’s a very big problem so some of you asking about the anti-nominalism um item so it was one of the big debates you had around the time of Martin Luther
Um I believe if I remember right Martin Luther actually had a lot of really heated debates with them and it was it it manif it manifested differently in a lot of different religions um you know you had similar things happen in Buddhism you had similar things happen in Judaism you had similar
Things happen in Christianity it was basically an argument of how do you well it was different across different religions so I should I shouldn’t blanket Define them let me explain first the Martin Luther debate and so uh during the time of Martin Luther when he you know published his
Criticisms of the Catholic church and nailed them to the church doors he of course set forth an idea that people should be able to self-study religion that it shouldn’t be held by a single power so on and so on part of it was defined as an argument against
Whether against to what degree should law be interpreted uh through the state versus through the religion and this has been a challenge through most of human history to what degree should religious value influence the nature of law the real hard thing is that we would like to
Have societies where you have a clear division between church and state you know that’s that’s a normal thing uh even going back to the second king of Rome by the way the the second king after Romulus for example uh you know they divided church and state there was
A separation of powers between the church and the state this was not just limited to Christianity or modern religions it goes to ancient religions as well where you had a priest sect and he had the ruling class they were separate but the but you know of course you always have the influence of
Morality on the interpretation of law that’s unavoidable as humankind it’s it’s unavoidable the idea that killing is wrong the idea that stealing is wrong the idea that you know incest is wrong these are religious Concepts the question we’ve always dealt with is a huge it’s human civilizations is
You know how do we how to what degree do we choose to enforce morality basically right uh we could even say the difference between modern conservatives and modern liberals is is a debate really between strictness and leniency you know it’s a debate between strictness and leniency to what degree
Are we strict to what degree are we lenient these debates have never ended one of the issues you had with the anti-nominalists though is that they they said that not only should should morality not be enforced through legal systems but it should not be enforced even by religious systems they believed
In an anti-moral system and so they believed hey uh got you know if you they believed if you repent for example with the Christians if you repent once you are forever forgiven and so any future violations of the the tenants of Christ are automatically forgiven and so they
Believe if you repent hey you could be a murderer you could be a thief you can keep doing that and you’re forgiven and so they they abandoned the in the concept that you need to be a moral person in order to go to heaven um of course you had other sects that
Strongly disbelieved that by the way that’s one of the main interpretations of gnosticism as well I’d say you you have entire sects that still hold that belief within Judaism you had uh 1666 um what was his name um Liberation through sin they believed in practicing the opposite of morality you
Violate all the tenets of the religion because they believed if you go to the opposite extreme we’ll have the opposite effect and you become a good person somehow Buddhism really was under the Sixth patriarch I believe huenung who set you know kind of changed the ideas
Of Zen and turn Buddhism into an idea that nothing exists and it eliminated the idea where you know they’re 11 there are 11 different sects of Buddhism Zen Buddhism is the one that believes like in nothing basically it’s it’s religious atheism basically and that would that of
Course came about mainly after the sixth patriarch and so you had this anti-moral movement that overtook a lot of modern religions um anti-nominalism and anti-nominalism has gone on to influence a lot of the modern interpretations of law I would actually argue that what we’re debating right now with for example the Biden
Administration going after traditional traditional Catholics is a manifestation of anti-nominalism um I mean it’s it’s actually crazy that this is not more widely discussed I I would argue you cannot understand modern politics without understanding the history of anti-nominalism so much of the world these days so many of our debates even communism and
Socialism you cannot understand these without understanding the history of anti-nominalism like so many of our debates are defined by this um it’s you know people are people are feeling around in the dark they they don’t they don’t understand the history of the things we’re actually debating
Um and so the argument from the Biden Administration is that really here if they’re investigating Catholics as being domestic extremists they’re arguing that by holding by holding values that reject the modern woke Concepts almost sexuality transsexualism rampant you know crime and so on loose on crime policies things that go against
Traditional religious values they’re arguing that by holding that those things are evil that Catholics are demonstrating a type of extremism and they that this is how they’re labeling different religions as being extremists and of course there’s different interpretations too to what degree should religions enforce that a lot of
Other religions would believe for example that morality is your own personal business um you know Confucianism talks about this for example to be lean to be lenient on others but strict with yourself although they still had clear definitions and interpretations of law when you infringe upon the well-being of
Others which I would argue a lot of the early American law was based on that as well American law was not the enforcement of religion but if you infringed upon the rights of others then that was considered a crime the history of law is fascinating by the way like it
Really you get into the details of it and how how religion influenced it and so it’s fascinating history my interpretation of what’s Happening though the Biden Administration is defining the law in line with the anti-nominalist by the way Gnostic occult movement which is overtaken unfortunately a lot of the modern
Interpretations of religious values that said not to get too historical and stuff with y’all let’s move on to some other topics but we cannot talk about these on YouTube uh the 2024 variant of covid has arrived um you know right just in time for the elections just in time for the elections
The new variant is emerging and you know outbreaks are happening everywhere and they’re arguing we might just need new types of uh lockdowns and so on to protect us all from this new and dangerous variant also Democrats have a new proposal on how to regulate guns
Which is tax them so hard that only the wealthy can afford them only guns for the wealthy we’ll talk about these uh briefly then we’ll jump into questions but first let’s jump over to Epoch TV exclusively because YouTube will in fact give me strikes potentially for talking about
Guns and talking about covet so come over to Epic TV we’re going to talk about guns and covet let me show you a trailer on another topic they will ban before by the way but I’m gonna show it anyway let me show you a trailer of my special feature premiering tomorrow we
Got the unreleased videos uh 40 000 hours have been going through although we have many we have to work we have to request segments from them they won’t give us all of them like in our possession uh we we can view them but we can’t get possession of all of them we
Have to request clip by clip it’s a very it’s a very difficult process to be honest but we’ve compiled these now into a special feature first of which will Air tomorrow 9 A.M eastern time let me show you a trailer of that and we’ll jump over So what was the process of actually putting this all together many many hours of finding the right camera angles and watching it first trouble started just after one o’clock 45 pages here it is right here Donald Donald somber day for the country this all happened before President Trump’s
Speech was over the founder of The Oath Keepers militia group is headed to prison for more than 18 years his lawyers didn’t have this video the video we’re watching right now his own lawyers did not have a question of what did the people do who actually did enter the building this is
Where we picked it up with the security footage that is new at this point the story dramatically changes the New Jersey man who assaulted a capital police officer on January 6th has been sentenced so this was withheld this was not shown to the defense that could be considered sculpatory evident
This doesn’t seem like what a lot of the media is showing but it’s going to change narratives no matter what your political perspective is what we’re after is the truth again folks that premieres tomorrow 9 A.M eastern time and uh my colleague Jill hanneman you know he’s
Our lead reporter on January 6 he did an incredible amount of work on this so you know kudos to him he’s the guy in the video with me um yeah let me know what you all think we’ll air it tomorrow morning
