Animals and rivers and mountains and so on and the loopholes with this they call it personhood status could even extend artificial int elligence let’s talk about it now look right now happening Farmers well there’s a proposal right now they could be labeled as being guilty of quote unquote ecocide like
Genocide against humans but against the environment ecocide and they could face criminal prosecution for the very Act of farming now this was among the more controversial positions that was expressed by a participant at the recent 2024 World economic Forum in Davos but it ties into an existing debate
Around the world on so-called personhood status which you may not have heard of but this is actually a pretty big debate right now personhood status like already there is a growing movement to give human rights the rights that you and I enjoy the protections of our life our
Liberty and the pursuit of happiness and extending that to giving those same protections to plants to animals to rivers to mountains to everything else including even robotss and artificial intelligence and as you would imagine this is Raising some concerns over what it means for the value of human life not
To mention the very basic ways we live what happens if you can’t eat a plate of food without being called you know called out for genocide and what does it mean well I can tell you right now this does tie into the future of bioengineered food and things like that
Which is of course part of the Takeover of America’s farmlands and also so it brings up a big issue that if everything is treated on the same value as a human life then what is the value of a human life let me show you this first Breitbart says the international
Criminal court should add EOS side to its brief alongside genocide crimes against humanity and war crimes to criminalize the side effects of farming fishing and energy production a green activist argued during the annual World economic Forum meeting in Davos Switzerland the now the Ally of Greta thornberg the CEO of stop equaide
International JoJo meta demanded during a WF Davos panel called where nature meets conflict on Tuesday that a new international criminal category of quote unquote EOS side to prevent the mass damage and destruction of nature you know should just be enacted and this woman meta who co-founded stop EOS side
Back in 2017 team alongside the late Green Legal activist Paulie Higgins said at the globalist world economic Forum meeting quote what are organization and other collaborators aim to do is to have this recognized legally as a serious crime because one of the issues that pervades this discussion is that we have
A culturally ingrained habit of not taking damage to Nature as seriously as we take damage to people and property now I know what you might be thinking yeah that’s just the crazies over at the world economic forum and you know that’s just one panel that’s one panel it does
Not necessarily mean they’re ever going to do it how could they possibly try to criminalize the act of cutting down a tree or pulling up a plant or you know maybe farming for some kind of you know corn or tomatoes or something like that how could they make it illegal how could
They protect these things using the crimes of genocide if you kill too many dang plans well I’ll tell you right now it sounds far out but there’s actually already programs in place on this in fact it adopted into the laws of some countries in the world currently as we
Speak there are laws on this already now the debate on this is what’s framed as personhood that’s one of the things they call it and this is being proposed right now remember this individual says you know we’re trying globally to do this it sounds crazy right but it’s being
Proposed and taken seriously as a way right now to Grant human rights status to plants animals and again even artificial intelligence you turn off your your little creepy robot well maybe you killed it and you’re guilty of of I don’t know if they call it EOS side but
Guilty of the killing of a life of an artificial intelligence under this system that they’re they’re pushing right now killing a plant killing an animal would be Sim similar to killing a human being and even again artificial intelligence could be granted legal protections through this in fact it’s
Already being done in some cases using some legal loopholes now this is the guardian talking about some of these existing programs and the push to extend it this was in October of 2022 and they said this granting legal rights and protections to non-human entities such as animals trees and rivers is is
Essential if countries are to tackle climate breakdown and biodiversity loss experts have said the authors of a report titled law in the emerging bio AG say legal Frameworks have a key part to play in governing human interaction with the environment and biotechnology Ecuador and Bolivia have already enshrined rights for the natural world
While there’s a campaign to make EOS side a prosecutable offense at the international AAL criminal court now briefly on this remember I just showed you what happened at the world economic Forum people laughed oh they’ll never do that they’ll never make ecocide a crime that is prosecutable in the international criminal court right
Alongside genocide and you know mass murder of civilians they would never do that they’re doing it they’re they’re pushing it right now in fact again in Ecuador and Bolivia they’ve already put these rights in place protecting the quote unquote natural world and as part of this push the report for
The the Law Society the professional body for solicitors in England and in Wales while they’re exploring how the relationship between humans and Mother Earth might be recipro reciprocated in the sorry uh recalibrated in the future now quotes this individual Dr Wendy Schultz a futurist and Report co-author
Who said this quote there is a growing understanding that something very different has to be done if our children are going to have a planet to live on that is in any way Pleasant much less survivable so this is an expanding Trend it is happening as fast as any us would
Is it happening as fast as any us would want possibly not which is why it’s important to get the word out now are you hearing this this is not some crazy you know we’re going to fight the farting cows type thing well it includes that this is not some crazy thing out
There remember for example when the green New Deal was proposed AOC was like we’re got to stop the farting cows that was actually in the report by the way in the first draft we have to tear down and rebuild every building in the entire United States we need to do all these
Things to save ourselves from the genocidal potential of a great disaster brought Upon Us by our poor living habits by greenhouse gases by driving cars by just living your normal life and eating the food on your plate because all that food and all those Farmers they’re generating greenhouse gases they
Created an enemy everywhere in the world now communism has always done this is always an external enemy it’s the kulacs it’s the wealthy peasants it’s the intellectuals it’s the land owners Hitler said it was the Jews right they always had an enemy that they focused the entire population on and then used
That narrative to reform and re redo and restructure the entire Society to launch their Revolution to bring about the change they wanted to justify their actions of seizing the means of production from the Common Man and placing it under a new social structure that’s not doing it to persecute you or
To carry out genocide but instead to protect you from the disaster and the people they say wish to harm you that has always been the narrative and here you you see them doing it again now part of this as well includes artificial intelligence and I I will emphasize
Something why would they do that why would they want to do that it’s because when they deem something in danger it means they can create legal authorities to protect that thing if they claim that farmers are the problem that farmers are carrying out ecos side what does that
Mean it means they can take over all the Farmland it means that they can create new policies for farming it means they can force you to co your cattle it means they can force you to no longer use nitrogens you’d have to put a they actually have it in some countries
Proposed for example in New Zealand burp counters on your cows that will tax you uh based on the methane gases your cow emits uh they’re already proposing doing that and it could also mean that they push things like for example new agendas sustainable food practices insects maggot milk cockroach milk that kind of
Stuff maggot milk literally they they crush them and make it into a butter uh by the way and of course that is one of the proposals for the New World freed from the abuses and the the darkness of the past and this is how they’re doing
It let me show you what they’re doing on the AI front which means also they could extend these laws over technology this is PBS on the AI front from way back in 2018 and they said this humans aren’t the only people in society let that sink
In humans are not the only people in society so what is a person well they’re saying this is already in place at least according to the law already they say in the United States corporations have been given rights of free speech and religion how is it possible that a corporation is
Granted human rights they say some natural features also have personlike rights this is already in place in some regards but both of those required changes to the legal system a new argument has laid a path for artificial intelligence systems AI to be recognized as people too without any legislation
Court rulings or other revisions to existing law in other words there are loopholes within the existing legal system to already enact these types of protections now they note legal scholar sha Bayer has shown that anyone can confer legal personhood to a computer system by putting it in the control of a
Limited liability Corporation an LLC in the United States and if that maneuver is upheld in courts artificial intelligence systems would be able to own property Sue hire lawyers and enjoy freedom of speech and other protections under the law in my view according to this author human rights and dignity
Would suffer as a result now briefly on that what they’re saying look they’re talking about ecocide and genocide and killing plants may maybe a hunter would be called a serial killer maybe a fisherman would be called a serial killer maybe a farmer would be called you know would be framed as like Hitler
Because he just kills so many plants when he harvests the food every year if they’re able to do this if they’re able to extend laws creating llc’s limited liability corporations under the great corporate Reform Act we had way back when uh this would enable them to extend legal rights freedom of speech freedom
Of legal representation the ability to sue to these entities understand as well that if you create an LLC you have to have Boards of directors you have to have other individuals on it which means you would have other you know of course human entities actual human beings representing those protections and those
Rights that guard the rights and protections of all these things they decide to Grant these two which which means that you know while maybe a stock of corn is not going to sue the farmer well the individuals the crazy Eco terrorists whatever the heck you want to
Call them uh who decide to form the LLC alongside that stock of corn they can sue and of course they can even bring criminal charges if the life of this entity is then harmed and think of what that means as well for AI if one of these companies decides to Grant
Personhood status to AI they note here that giving a AI artificial intelligence rights similar to humans involves a technical lawyerly maneuver meaning there a weird legal system they say it starts with one person setting up two limited liability corporations companies llc’s and then turning over control of
Each company to a separate autonomous or artificially intelligent system in other words the AI is not going to do it itself the stock of corn is not going to do it itself the fish or the deer is not not going to go and create an LLC right but the crazy
Ecomaniac might register two llc’s they’ll do it themselves and then they’ll say I grant i i i defer the control of this LLC to this deer that we found in the forest that we captured and put a little tag on its here so we could identify it and this deer this wild
Animal has now been endowed with the rights bestowed upon it through an LLC and that is how they want to do it and they could of course do this as well for a computer for a non-living entity something that doesn’t even live or breathe or eat like an artificial
Intelligence now imagine if you’re out and about and some very creepy uh you know guy has a big like robot sex doll and you accidentally trip and you know something happens and you accidentally destroy the man’s robot sex doll he could say this you you kill the human being being you’re guilty of
Manslaughter because I deferred human rights upon this crazy sex doll I have and you could standal for the murder of this doll this man purchased by and then gave rights to by creating two llc’s and then deferring the rights of those llc’s to his sex doll think of the future
We’re entering as this happens now it notes Here Right that after all this stuff they give these they give this uh they add each company as a member to the other LLC and so on right because what they do again they register two corporations they defer the rights to an
Individual or to a non- individual an animal or a plant or an AI then the person would add each company as a member of the other LLC it it takes a little bit of a legal maneuver and they note here that in that last step the person would withdraw themselves from
Both llc’s which would then leave each LLC a corporate entity with legal personhood governed only by the others AI system and of course if you understand the way that corporate structures work where you can have different ownership tiers there’s a lot of stuff you could do with that now
There are other issues in all of this some environmentalists they want protection uh personhood status for Rivers for forests uh some of these things are geographical Fe or sorry geological features maybe a mound or or a mountain or something else uh they could even there’s even proposals to Grant this for
Entire you know entities uh for example you know not a single tree but as I mentioned like an entire forest and if you understand that understand the way that even you know melium growth might create an interconnected you know entity they can use that as well um of course
Which would make it so you can’t even do much in the entire land mass because of the melium growth uh if you understand understand that in some areas like redwood trees they’re interconnected through their roots and you could have one giant living entity that is Untouchable it has been granted the
Rights of a human being and they believe they can do this for other things because again it g gives them protection similar to what you and I enjoy other people want personed status for Animals because they view them as lives and of course you know when it comes to
Artificial intelligence well look we can watch Sci-Fi movies already out there at playing with this idea what makes us human what what defer what what what what is it that gives human beings the rights of human beings if you say that it’s a because we’re a living entity well animals are
Living entities plants are living entities what’s the difference between an animal and a plant if we’re all living entities if you’re saying well it’s because humans are intelligent well what does it mean that if a computer can demonstrate what looks like a similar level of intelligence as human human
Being we are playing now with the very concepts of what constitutes human life and what defers upon us the value that we believe a human life has now I will say that this is part of the big debate we’ve been going on with as a society
For very long time I’ll remind you all of a very old very famous court case Leupold versus lobe let me tell you it one of the first in incidents of school murder was a case called Leopold versus lobe and you had two very intelligent young men extremely intelligent top of
The school right and they decided one day to commit the perfect crime these two young men kidnapped murdered raped the dead body of uh one of the younger cousins of one of these men and made the made a big mistake where one of them dropped his glasses which was a very
Rare prescription and the glasses were then used to track it back to the individual and both of them stood trial during that trial there was a major debate in America and it tied of course there was the legal debate you know these individuals how could how could this happen right these two
Extremely intelligent very you know young men with probably very Bright Futures from wealthy homes who should have had no reason to commit a crime like this why would they do it and the argument that was raised during the court and socially in the United States at the time was very interesting they
Said that schools are teaching kids that there is no God schools are teaching kids that there is no soul if there’s no God and no soul then why should they care if there’s no afterlife no consequence for evil then who cares what what does it matter if you can get away
With a crime why not commit it and it raised the question of what is good and what is evil if children are taught there is no such thing as good and evil now this ties of course into the question we’re now grappling with because I’d say the answer to these
Questions what’s the differ between a human and an animal what’s the difference between you know an AI system and a human being if an AI system is intelligent right it’s smart it can do math faster than us it can pull up documents and legal papers and books
Faster than we can it can create art and movies and all kinds of things how is it different from us well it’s not different unless you believe in the existence of the human soul and that’s the key difference we have reached this stage as a society because we’ve cheapened the value of
Human life we have degraded the value of human life and when people no longer believe that the human life has some kind of god- granted rights that we have rights given to us by God himself which is of course the basis of the Declaration of Independence and the
Basis of the concepts of Human Rights notably in the entire liberal world order that we live under the entire system where why whereby we believe the the nature of government is to guard our god-given rights and not for us to to serve some tyrannical leader if we
Cheapen this then that entire system is what’s at risk now again folks we have a lot of stuff going on right now with this and you know we have things that like you know identity politics kids can identify as cats and dogs now a grown man can say
That he identifies as a deer that he’s a wild deer and he can run around the forest dressed like a deer and you have to call him a deer or you might get charged with a crime they can say that they’re a horse there are there are people literally as we speak who
Identifies horses and look the look you could say it’s just a crazy individual you know what do you you do you don’t don’t involve me in it but you know you do you just don’t make me call you a horse or a cat or a dog but these actually have broader implications if
The identities that these persons have conferred upon themselves are recognized as being legally legitimate and we have to under the law you know say okay that’s a that’s a cat I guess uh that’s a that’s a tree person uh I don’t believe it but I don’t
Want to get thrown in prison then it raises the question as well if a person becomes a cat if a human being becomes a dog if a person becomes a tree then does that mean that the indiv idual in turn have surrendered their human rights
Because as we know a tree or a cat or a dog or a deer or a stock of corn these things don’t have human rights and so if legally we have to recognize these people as you know being what they claim to be but they identify as does it then
Limit them to the rights of a tree or a cat or a dog or a deer and can you hunt them can you take them as pets can you cut them down what does it mean right these are the legal questions we’re going to start grappling with as this
Frankly General Madness and this social Insanity that is sweeping the world right now is able to stand that say the underlying question of how do we live as humans if we can’t eat plants or animals or use natural resources for our daily lives what does it mean for us if they
Begin conferring rights on let’s say natural gas the this gas store has been given the rights of a human being through a wonderful LLC we have registered a corporation that these this natural gas deposit is now protected with basic human rights and you cannot touch it you can’t harm
It or this natural gas deposit will sue you or at least on behalf of the lawyers who are guarding it who are the craziest individuals known to man right what does it mean for human beings if we are no longer allowed to use the natural environment as the basis to sustain Our
Lives I would say that this will undermine the basic concept of the value of human life life and I’d question as well what is humanity and what what are human rights in that case if every single thing in the world is lifted to the status of Being Human if we regard
An animal and a plant and an AI and whatever else as having the same value of a human life I would argue that we will not recognize these things as actually having the same value instead what will happen is that the value of human life will be lowered to be on par
With that of a plant or an animal or a tree or an AI now meanwhile John kery the former climate Zar he stepping down claims that the drive for the global warming agenda is tied in with business you got to make money with it it’s you can get rich off
Of it and he claims that a president of the United States could not even derail this agenda because it’s just too far along I’ll be talking about this and more topics including going to the Q&A after the break though so for those of you on YouTube Facebook Twitter this
Time again join us on Epic TV EPO ctv.com where again we do the full episodes of the Q&A we have a lot of great documentaries and special features uh briefly as well again on Tuesdays and Thursdays I do do the full episodes on YouTube but I will move the parts that
Will probably get me banned or censored to Epic TV and so again join us on Epic TV for the rest of today’s episode before I get into that though what happens folks if farmers get criminally charged and there’s no Farmers left well that can mean that the whole food
Ecosystem comes crashing down as well Roman balakov one of my colleagues host of facts matter in Epic TV he actually did a big investigation on the agenda against farmers and he has a documentary called No Farmers no food you can also watch that exclusively on Epic TV I
Highly recommend it if you haven’t seen it yet because it shows this agenda link to that in the description below but let me show you the trailer food prices are skyrocketing around the world and if you listen to world leaders they’ll tell you it’s due to climate change climate change is the
Biggest threat for the human beings and their solution might surprise you there are 1900 edible insect species on the planet the European commission has officially declared mealworms to be food yes this food the people in charge have determined that by switching our diet to crickets ants and meal worms will be
Able to stop temperatures from rising lower the price of food and possibly to even Save the Planet it’s never about Innovation it’s always about getting rid of farmers Agenda 21 was meant to be the agenda for the 21st century some of the goals sound nice ending hunger who could possibly be
Against ending hunger it requires total power from the state I think it’s a game a lot of this came about early ’70s Clean Water Act Clean Air Act which were good things but it’s been abused from what the original tient is no maybe not not a farm anymore no
There also not a farm anymore so all these people shut down because of the government policies yeah I’m the sixth generation of farmer yeah I’m the fourth generation how many years have they owned this plat land 40 years I think with Lost Generation they’re shutting down the small and middle-sized family
Run Farms we either own property or we are property I don’t think we can trust the government anymore because they want the land and our founding fathers understood that the land would be distributed among the people so they could always control their government right now things have uh
Tripled as far as cost I think you’re going to see across the board higher food prices has anybody been held accountable for screwing up no as every communist H into the last 100 years has understood if you control the food you control the people everything is falling
Apart there’s a shortage of food s heading for a world food crisis as we hear all the time do you see any hope for the situation yeah we have to continue fighting for it no Farms no food they will know It look that’s a very important documentary I highly recommend watching it and again if you want to watch it the link to that is in the description below this video
