Reaction & Commentary
A bloody idiot but you’re not one you’re an awakened Wonder hello there you glorious Awakening wonders thanks for joining us on this Voyage to truth we must not become amnesiacs we mustn’t succumb to stupidity neither must we lose our hope and our trust that things will be okay
If we continue to individually awaken even when there’s Now new evidence that suggests that at the beginning of the pandemic period when certain measures were being proposed it was known even then that the measures wouldn’t work in the way that was being suggested and in fact mandated what a fascinating story
What a troubling time please turn on the notification bells and subscribe right now notification Bells no they’re not multiple just one ding have a look at what we’re doing over here on stay free this story is fascinating and in some ways difficult to report because I want
To make sure that you remain engaged by it like some sort of lawyer undertaking a course we’re piecing together evidence to show you that what you felt intuitive did and sometimes new is in fact true and that you’re able to have a cohesive cogent conversation about it without
Resorting as I sometimes do I suppose privately hopefully not here because we’re working very hard to not do that but sometimes personally I go look I just don’t trust them I don’t trust them she becomes emotional all you have to have is evidence and evidence is what we have here firstly
Let’s have a look at Rochelle wolensky in Congress claiming that vaccines are effective under oath significantly and we will note the date in a second the vaccine did not stop spread or infection I’m not saying it was completely bad but it did not stop the spread or infection
I think actually if I could actually um just correct that point and that is initially it did for the Wuhan stream and for the alpha stream all of the early data and the literature published in the New England Journal demonstrated that for those who worked if you didn’t
Get infected that you were not transmitting it to other people and it had very high efficacy early on up to 96 so it did change over time no for example that they’re willing to cite information from the New England Journal when it’s convenient ignore it when it’s
Not amazing but prior to that testimony there is information and evidence that suggests that Rochelle walensky didn’t believe what she was saying herself emails obtained just through honesty through and being given out because we have a transparent government no no no through the Freedom of Information Act
That means that people had to go give us the information come on give us it oh we don’t want to it’ll make you not like us it’ll make you less obedient give us the information Freedom of Information Act requests show the CDC director Rachelle wolenski and former NIH director Francis
Collins were aware of and discussed breakthrough cases of covid in January 2021 right when the vaccines became widely available in her email what lensky says that clearly it is an important area of study links to a study raising the issue and assures the person she is sending it to that Dr Anthony
Fauci is looped into these conversations here is the email now no the date of the email that’s January the 30th 2021 dear all I had a call with Francis Collins this morning one of the issues we discussed was that of vaccine breakthroughs this is clearly an important area of studying specifically
Called out this week here Nancy and I discussed this briefly a few weeks ago I understand that should we discuss what’s the best next step forward France is also discussing with Tony Tony fauci your friend and mine thanks all Rochelle however in public well lensky was saying something quite different two months
After discussing this data she said vaccinated people don’t carry the virus and don’t get sick in a congressional hearing after it became clear people were able to get infected with covid even after receiving the vaccine she defended her original statements by claiming it was true at the time she
Said it namely for the strands we were dealing with in early 2021. oh we’re getting into some interesting territory now it was true then wow like it’s seasonal truth it’s temporal truth not a central truth and of course our understanding of Truth does evolve and change but remember we just showed you
The date of the email we now know that was not true and that wolensky herself knew it was not true so the defense that they were saying what they believed to be true and that the science changed even though of course one of the things that many of us were concerned about was
The Prohibition of discourse not just like nitwits you’re not a doctor when did you become an MD not just people shouting out on social media or inquiring or being hesitant they’re experts being shut down sensitive and controlled if their views happen to be at odds with the official preferred
Narrative at that time the people themselves that were pushing that information didn’t believe it to be true they didn’t believe what they were saying themselves that’s a different inflection altogether Jay battacharya a professor at the Stanford school of medicine called the Revelation stunning he pointed out that despite this
Knowledge they continued to push vax mandates anyway it’s not even that they thought that the vaccine mandates were for the best and were now wrong that’s been proven that they were wrong they knew they were wrong when they were saying it this is the real Scandal as there is little harm in getting
Something wrong like this in a vacuum after all covid-19 vaccines certainly saved many many lives and reduced the severity of infection for many more so there you go this is not an attack on vaccines this is saying that under the right circumstances vaccines were effective but that there is no excuse
For pushing for mandates when you know that that will not be an effective measure unless could there be some other motivation just think for a while about history the trajectory of the world what the most powerful institutions in the world just have a look at the spreadsheets of I don’t know Pfizer
Their profits in years like 2022 then that might help you come to some conclusions but the fact vaccine mandates were pushed even though those in charge new people could contract and spread the virus while vaccinated is indefensible that is difficult to defend isn’t it that they misled the public on
This makes it even worse remember all of the shaming all of the condemnation the shutting down of censorship the ridicule the public figures and private individuals face the mandates the arrest remember in countries like Australia the kind of mad weird covid camps remember the lockdowns the length is so
Extraordinary because I think all of us are a bit fatigued want to kind of Slough it off and just move on and get over it and actually so do I but I feel that in order to move through this with some valuable learning it’s important to address exactly what happened because
The mentality that guided actions regulation legislation propaganda during this period will still be there because as you can see they’re not telling the truth still no one’s come out and gone listen we were completely wrong we know we’re wrong we knew we’re wrong then
This is why we did it we were trying our best we’ll never do it again imagine if it was a personal issue if you caught someone out in a lie if they continue lying to you you know that there’s no chance of improvement well that’s what we’re faced with here if the vaccine
Stopped kovid dead in its tracks as falchi explained then the decision to Institute a vaccine mandate would merely be a controversial yet ultimately legitimate Public Health measure the fact it did not do that but rather primarily had personal benefits completely removes the justification for mandate if the vaccines are only good
For the person that takes the vaccine it’s purely a personal choice remember that remember that argument that no it’s not a personal choice because you’re selfish you have to take it think about other people you could be killing your grandmothers all that stuff we’ve been invited to allow that to just disappear
Into some fog of recent memory but that is one of the conditions that orwellian despotism requires that you don’t remember you know we would we were never at war with Oceano we never told you that we never mandated vaccines we always told you the truth it’s vital it’s necessary not that you become
Embedded or cynical or hopeless or rigid or broken or brittle or any of those things it’s just vital that you are able to stand in the truth of what happened the Biden Administration tried to impose a vaccine mandate on employers thousands of people were fired from their jobs and
There was a time when unvaccinated people were not even allowed into restaurants in some of the country’s largest cities and it was all based on a line sometimes I get like a little Pang I’m just driving along and I think hey there was stuff that I had paid through
It I can rages me and you know what I love from it never trust them like and that’s not healthy is it is it that like my position is Never Trust Authority Always Be circum respect if they tell you it that means it really really might
Not be true how can you ever have legitimate trust in any of these agencies any of these unelected agencies again when we know that they lied knew that they lied then claimed that oh well we didn’t know that then but they actually did I mean there’s just such a
Vast pyramid of untruth emerging almost like the real pyramid I can’t conceive of how they built it there must be a substantive Reckoning with our Public Health institutions and government more generally in the aftermath of the pandemic from vaccines to masks to schools to economic aid it seems that
Each aspect of the pandemic was accompanied by its own set of lies and distortions there is a reason trust in our institutions has taken such a hit in recent years oh well at least it is not a raft of legislation around the world to send sense of debate coming around at
Least the EU aren’t looking to find social media platforms who don’t immediately comply with their censorship recommendations at least comparable regulations and legislations aren’t being proposed in all anglophonic countries known as the five eyes countries a nickname that we learned off from Edward Snowden when we learned that they are spying extensively and
Illegally on their own citizens and exchanging data with other nations do you think that this legislation is being passed in order to prevent conversations like this becoming popularized in order to prevent us from recognizing and disseminating their lives in order to prevent them again imagine that we
Weren’t able to share this imagine that we weren’t able to update one another on what’s being happened imagine we didn’t have access to these emails you won’t have to imagine it for long because they’re legislating it if those in charge do not at some point recognize
What they did commit not to do it again and actually act differently next time they’re in a similar situation then institutional trust will continue to get worse so there you are increasingly we’re are able to witness that precisely what you intuited and felt and were condemned as being hysterical or
Conspiratorial for believing is demonstrable in the same way that people claimed oh well we believe that to be true at the time but then evidence emerged well what about the evidences emerging now it underwrites everything the cynicism the marches the protests the doubt the demand for free speech the
Demand that there be less censorship all of this is becoming legitimized now and we’re not seeing any acknowledgment we’re not seeing any apology we’re not seeing any pledge to preventing ever happening again in fact the who are lobbying for the right to impose non-national Global undemocratic measures in the event of a future
Pandemic which based on this mentality I don’t feel comfortable entrusting to the very same people who have behaved in this way do you do you have doubts about the moral ethical constitution of the people in charge when it’s demonstrable that they lied where there hasn’t been
An apology I feel that what we need is a great public Reckoning I think the people from the president down need to come out and say we got these things wrong we’re sorry about it it’s never going to happen again we’re going to ensure that if ever anything this
Controversial and radical occurs the last thing we’ll do is censor it there will be open debate experts from across the Spectrum will be invited at the most public forums available to tell you they’re difficult opposing views nothing will happen without a vote you’ll vote for it if your community says we’re not
Having lockdowns you won’t have lockdowns if you as an individual say I’m not taking medications that you can’t prove are beneficial for communities we’re certainly not going to try and mandate that we’re going to recognize that the role of government is to facilitate the will of the people not
To impose government will on people we need radical change we are talking about the pandemic because we care about the pandemic I mean because we care about the pandemic a bit but we care more about what the pandemic has revealed about power that was always there and
Power that will be used again if we don’t do something about it and the only way to oppose it is together but that’s just well I think why don’t you let me know what you think in the comments below if you enjoyed this video have a
Look at this one it’s also very good and this Monday Jordan Peterson is joining us on stay free with Russell Brand over on you nowhere turn on the notification Bell And subscribe right now but more important than any of that please if you can stay free
