Reaction & Commentary
Restart from scratch was that what was on the line here because she perjured herself against uh uh and this is of course in the case against Donald Trump in Georgia um and the judge Scott McAfee has come out in a 23-page ruling issued he said that the defendants
Failed to meet their burden improving Willis’s relationship with a special prosecutor Nathan Wade was a conflict of interest enough to Merit her removal from the case the judge did find an appearance of impropriety and said either Willis goad and her office may leave the case or Wade must withdraw
From the proceeding so basically what’s going to happen here he’s is the dude’s going to get fired and she’s going to be able to you know keep going this is not you know this is unbelievable it’s incredible after after never seen have you ever seen a clearer case of
Perjury everyone on Earth knows she was lying everyone on Earth knows she was lying he was lying everybody knows it there is no justice there were there really is no justice I mean if you want to know how uh African-Americans felt in you know the 1930s 40s 50s especially in
The South here it is here it is you you can see it with your eyes you hear the testimony and you just know it’s rigged it’s rigged because there’s no way any reasonable person would come up with that no way what do you mean an appearance of impropriety I mean how can
You possibly think this is just an appearance of impropriety now again we talked about this at at the beginning if they had come out and said look Nathan Wade is just the best guy out there yeah I had an affair with him he’s an incredible man had to have a piece I
Just had to H but he’s an incredible attorney and we admit to everything and I hired him because he’s the best yep probably this just they just skate instead they decided to lie throughout the entire thing uh you know every boldly boldly boldly I mean it is not
Like you know you can debate well I just made a mistake I well I was no they boldly took the stand wanted to lie and did lie and did lie over and over over and over and over again uh this was it was noted by the you know
The judge that this was not this situation was not proper however basically they’re just going to make him leave yes but how does she stay forget the relationship how does she stay even an attorney if she has purered herself you I mean this is so far beyond the
Relationship I barely cared about this story when there was a relationship involed you know it’s was like okay whatever but when she started lying on the stand and he started lying on the stand and and and it was proven there is absolutely no way she
Should be in a position of power and she certainly and so should he lose his law license there is no law if attorneys can get away with that none none none it’s quite the statement but it’s hard to disagree with I mean they they were overt in this Glenn we all know
Just looking at it from a human perspective everyone can know they were lying now did they did they they didn’t go through a perjury trial right they didn’t go through a uh a a a a bar hearing where they had to fight for their license they went through
Something that was supposed to you know a proceeding that was supposed to rule on this case and in this case they’re going to let her stay on obviously that’s going to be the choice she makes by the way but how how how can the Judge believe anything that she is presenting or
Saying if the judge knows she boldly knowingly lied in two other cases how I certainly can’t believe a word she’s saying I I don’t know how he it’s it is incredible and you’d be right to look at this and say this is uh seemingly very unfair I mean I don’t
I don’t know how you can look at this and say anything other than they they look they definitely want Donald Trump to get in in legal trouble this is you know this there’s no question about that and if they don’t if they keep fonny Willis um on the trial
There’s a chance that these things can come to fruition before the election if they throw her off basically it’s over and they don’t want that I uh a new study shows that what uh the Supreme Court doctrine that was the old uh Doctrine created by the Supreme
Court allows 96% of uh private property is open now to warrantless searches the daa a DEA in a completely other new Story shows uh that they had a surveillance program on Americans they have collected massive amounts of telephone records for 20 years and it was shuddered by because
Of the Edward uh Edward Snowden revelations in 2013 the Inspector General is has released a report heavily redacted um and uh that has been released that was released six years later the Washington examiner has just received a copy of it the office of Inspector General exists to provide oversight of government agencies among
The new details of the DEA program is that it refused to comply with parts of the IG investigation for seven months and no one faced any consequences can you trust Inspector General reports anymore can you trust that Congress even has oversight or even if they want to have oversight this the
Country has broken down and all of the problems that are happening right now are because we’ve abandoned all of our principles does it ever feel to you let me take a break let me just take a break I sorry we didn’t expect that news broke just as I was fin finishing
That commercial let me uh give you a quick uh rundown of what their argument is what the judge’s argument is in this case Glenn basically they start off and they go through I have the ruling here I’ve been reading reading it as you’ve been talking but they go through the
Idea whether she F financially benefited from this first and they their argument is basically we don’t have proof of that we don’t know for sure they essentially buy the fonny Willis argument of number one she already makes a bunch of money she doesn’t have like massive debts
There was no she wasn’t doing this purely for financial gain she they bought the idea that okay she paid for one of these trips which it does seem like she did one the the birthday trip that she mentioned many times so it wasn’t like and I think I I sort of
Agree right like I think you probably do too yeah this isn’t necessarily entirely about like oh we hired this guy just so I could take trips like I don’t think that’s necessarily what happened right um I think it could they were hooking up and they wanted to take trips and he
Bought a lot of the trips and hey it just happened to work out very well but I don’t know that that was the primary reason it was more like she wanted the guy she was sleeping with to be close um and uh that’s a massive problem there but
Let me give you this paragraph This is after they basically say look there’s there’s issues here but we can’t prove that that was her motivation without sufficient evidence that the district attorney acquired a personal stake in the prosecution or that her financial arrangements had any impact on
The case the defendant’s claims of an actual conflict must be denied this finding is by no means an indication that the court condones this tremendous lap and judgment or the unprofessional manner of the District Attorney’s testimony during the evidentiary hearing un professional he’s admitting he knows that that she was lying basically that’s
Not unprofessional it’s much more than it’s perjury I would agree I mean that’s a separate you don’t necessarily get charged with it in that way you’d have to have a separate hearing on it but still it rises to that standard to me uh he says rather it is the signed opinion
That the Georgia law does not permit the finding of an actual Conflict for simply making bad choices even repeatedly and it is the trial Court’s duty to confine itself to the relevant issues and applicable law properly brought before it other forms of or sources of authority such as the G General Assembly
He’s giving a path here the general assembly the Georgia state ethics commission the State Bar of Georgia the Falon County Board of Commissioners or the voters of Bolton County may offer feedback for any unanswered questions that linger this is directly from the ruling but those are not the issues
Determinative of to the defendants motions alleging an actual conflict so he’s basic you know I think you could very fairly look at this and say he’s being challenged by a you know Jesse Jackson disciple he’s terrified he’s going to lose his job you can you can
Argue that he just lose your job you can argue terrified what a coward well he would terrified to lose your job how dare you your job is a constitutional post and you’re terrified you know what I’m terrified of I’m terrified of an out ofcontrol government swooping in and arresting my employees or arresting
Me that’s what I’m that’s what I’m afraid of okay plus everything else that’s going on that I’m worried about my family my children how dare any any of you judges be afraid that you’ll lose your job boohoo Cry Me a River it is our Constitution and our country that is at
Stake and none of this monologue has anything to do with Donald Trump none of it we all know she perjured herself I don’t care about their relationship I don’t care about the money the people of Georgia should what I care about more than even the case with Donald Trump is that this
Woman perjured herself and so did her boyfriend they knowingly gleefully wickedly perjured themselves over and over neither of them should have a law license today neither of them allegedly so uh uh we allegedly just trying to protect you from getting sued um no but I mean I
Think there is a uh a a standard here where like as as a person who is a normal human being looking at what they said I I’m not a lawyer I don’t know every little in and out of what they’re doing here well we’ll have them on to
Talk about it but it’s to me blatantly obvious I said this a 100 times no human being in history has actually done the things they said they did nobody that and that is outside of the cell phone data where we know she was that like it’s so blatantly
Obvious to any human being it is the cell phone data yeah it is that forget about forget says etc etc it is the cell phone GPS location by triangulating the phones that they know he was re may not know that he was in bed with her but I’m sure
The CIA has some satellites that can see the heat of bodies through roofs of houses they can look through now and see through Wi-Fi and see who’s in the rooms exactly right if if that triangulation doesn’t hold up as evidence to be fair I don’t think that’s
What he’s saying I don’t think he’s saying the cell phone data doesn’t hold up I think he’s blatantly ad he’s basically admitting they had this relationship and they were lying yeah so wait so he can allow them to go on a Case when they shouldn’t be when they
Perjured themselves in his court as well as another courtroom again I disagree with this ruling but what I that’s why I read that paragraph because he’s basically stating I don’t have the legal authority to do this on these on these grounds uh he’s saying these other institutions should be the ones doing
This they should be the ones disqualifying her I can only Act under the law that I have you know at my uh behest right now a coward well I look I I I tend to agree with you strongly but that is his argument he’s saying he’s
Limited by the law it’s not just that you can’t if there was the financial aspect he could throw her off he’s saying I don’t have the financial aspect locked down enough therefore I can’t doy one is fraud the other is perjury under oath by an officer of the
Court I got news for you gang if this is the way you can just go to court you think any lawyer is not going to tell murderers and everything else exactly what to say no no no no no change change change that story a bit Yeah stick to
Your story I mean this is you know this is a mafia tactic right if the mafia were to exist this would be one of the tactics of course they don’t exist don’t any more enemies they I love and if they do exist I love the
Mob but I think that is real right like why all you have to do and they proved that they talked they talked coordinate your story that’s basically what occurred here they they they had a very similar story and like again I don’t think the I don’t think fonny Willis was
Saying hey if I hire this guy I will be able to go to Napa Valley in 6 months I don’t think that’s the full motivation but to your point a much greater violation has occurred they went in front of this judge and blatantly lied in my view over and over and over and
Over and over again and that doesn’t I mean I mean I just want to say in your view no let’s follow the science GPS coordination according to the GPS coordinate coordinates yes and if that is not reliable technology to your point are a lot of criminals out on the street later
Today let me just say this real quick please D Jesus come or send us an asteroid CU I can’t take much more of this
