MOVING THIS CASE FORWARD AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE. PETE: IN THE INTEREST OF DEMOCRACY. HOW AMAZING OF HIM. RACHEL: HE’S A PATRIOT. PETE: THIS IS AFTER WILLIS WAS FORCED TO TAKE THE STAND OVER HIS RELATIONSHIP WITH WADE AND OVERSHADOWED THE TRUMP CASE AND LED TO MOMENTS LYING THIS ONE.
>> YOU’RE CONFUSED AND THINK I’M ON TRIAL. THESE PEOPLE ARE ON TRIAL FOR TRYING TO STEAL AN ELECTION IN 2020. I’M NOT ON TRIAL NO MATTER HOW HARD YOU TRY TO PUT ME ON TRIAL. I THINK YOU LIED RIGHTED HERE, YOU LIED RIGHT HERE. NO, NO, NO, NO. THIS IS THE TRUTH.
THIS IS A LIE. WILL: GREG JARRET JOINING US HERE. JUDGE MACK FEE TRIED TO TRIED TO SPLIT THE BABY AND PUNISH WILLIS AND WADE FOR THE APPEARANCE OF IMPROPRIETY. HE SAID IT WAS CLEAR THEIR BEHAVIOR WAS AT BEST FROWNED UPON BUT DIDN’T IMPACT THE DEFENDANT, IN THIS CASE DONALD
TRUMP AND OTHERS, DUE PROCESS RIGHTS. >> YEAH, WELL, HE’S WRONG, WILL. I MEAN, THIS DECISION IF YOU READ IT, 23 PAGES AND IT’S ILLOGICAL AND SELF-CONTRADISTRICT REIGNS LEADING AND WILLIS AND WAGE — SELF-CONTRADICTORY AND WILLIS AND WADE ENCAGED IN THE ACTS THAT DEMAND REMOVAL AND ORDERS THAT ONLY ONE HAS TO LEAVE THE
CASE AND MAKE NOSOSENSE OBVIOUSLY BECAUSE THE APPEARANCE OF IMPROPRIORITY REMAINS AND INFECTS THE CASE AND THE DEFENDANT AND DUE PROCESS RIGHTS, WHICH MEANS I THINK THIS WAS A CRAVEN POLITICAL RULING WRITTEN BY A DEMOCRAT JUDGE WHO WASN’T ABOUT TO JEOPARDIZE HIS REELECTION INTERFERENCE IN A FEW MONTHS AND GRATUITOUSLY TOSSES
WILLIS THIS LIFELINE TO KEEP THE CASE AGAINST TRUMP GOING AND IF SHE’S DISQUALIFIED BY THE COURT, SO IS HER ENTIRE OFFICE AND WOULD EFFECTIVELY KILL ANY SENSIBLE PROSECUTOR ELSEWHERE AND WOULD TAKE ONE LOOK AT THIS CASE AND RECOGNIZE THAT IT’S WEAKER NONEXIST TENT ON RACKETEERING AND IN — NONEXISTENT ON RACKETEERING AND
IT’S A LEGAL ETHICAL TRAIN WRECK AND THE STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL TAKING IT FOR REVIEW AND THAT’S WHERE IT MAY HAVE BEEN HEADED. RACHEL: YEAH, SO INTERESTING AND LOOKING AT HER IN ALL HER DRAMATIC MOMENTS AND NOT GOING TO SAY, I’M NOT GOING TO LIE, IT’S VERY ENTERTAINING, AND I
CAN SEE WHY HE DOESN’T WANT TO UPSET FEMALE VOTERS THAT LIKE THE WAY SHE’S PERFORMING ON THE STAND, AND THE QUESTION IS WHERE DO I GO IN TERMS OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC OPINION ABOUT THIS BEING ELECTION INTERFERENCE OF THE ENTIRE PROCESS FOR DONALD TRUMP. THEY’RE TRYING TO TIE HIM UP IN
THESE COURT CASES AND MAKE THAT CASE. >> IT’S LAW FAIR WEAPON SIZING THE LAW FOR POLITICAL PURPOSES. YOU KNOW, WILLIS SEEMS TO BE POPPING CHAMPAGNE CORKS AND THAT’S PREMATURE AND THIS FURTHER DELAYS THE PROSECUTION AND MAY PUT IT IN JEOPARDY AND MAY NOT SURVIVE PROFESSIONALLY BECAUSE A GEORGIA SENATE INVESTIGATION AND A PROSECUTOR’S
COMMISSION NOW ARMED WITH THE JUDGE’S FINDINGS, A SCATHING REBUKE OF WILLIS’ BEHAVIOR, I MEAN, HE CALLED HER UNPROFESSIONAL. SAID SHE MAY HAVE BEEN UNTRUTHFUL AND DISHONEST. MY GOODNESS, THAT IS A BREACH OF DUTY, IT’S GROUNDS FOR REMOVAL FROM OFFICE. NOT JUST A CASE. SHE UNDERMINED THE PUBLIC’S TRUST. BUT WILLIS IS ALSO FACING
ADDITIONAL PROBES, MISUSE OF PUBLIC FUNDS, OTHER IMPROPRIETIES. REPORTEDLY EMPLOYEES ARE LINING UP TO TESTIFY AGAINST HER. I’LL MAKE THIS PREDICTION AND SHE’LL TRY TO DEFUSE ALL OF THIS BY ANNOUNCING SOME TIME SOON THAT ANOTHER PROSECUTOR IN THE OFFICE WILL TRY THE CASE. WELL, THAT DOESN’T REMOVE EITHER HER OR THE TAINTED PARTISAN DA
THAT WEAPONNIZED THE LAW TO BRING A POLITICALLY-DRIVEN CASE TO INFLUENCE A PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION. PETE: HER MOMENT IN THE SPOTLIGHT AND SEEMS TO ALL BE CAVING IN WITH THE CASE WITH IT POTENTIALLY AND ALL THE CASES, GREGG, IT FEELS LIKE ACROSS TH
