So but what if another form of pollution existed that was invisible to us would it be more difficult to notice its effects would enough people care before it was seemingly too Late the biggest Danger from cell phon by far and away is texting and driving it has nothing to do with cancer current estimates gauge that just north of 5 billion persons have a cell phone using apps that send and receive electromagnetic radiation or EMR you can’t see it or hear it electro magnetic
Radiation this form of radiation occurs naturally on our planet but with the rapid advancement in Wireless technology some experts claim the proliferation of man-made artificial EMR is dangerous to human health these are the common symptoms that people start to experience this is actually from a published paper
On the health effects of Wireless Smart Meters as speaking now as a biologist and as physician was not designed to deal with the ex explosion of EMF activity in the environment in the it’s not just in in the air but in the land in the sea everywhere there’s emfs
Everywhere you can’t escape it electromagnetic radiation exists on a spectrum ranging from ionizing radiation like x-rays which can move through you and take pictures to non-ionizing radiation like microwaves which can heat up your favorite snack our cell phones tablets Wi-Fi routers smart gadgets and smart meters are all emitting and
Receiving microwave radiation or RF radiation Wireless technology emits and receives radiation with less than 2 watts of power this causes only a tiny amount of warming significantly less than the 1,000 Watts used by microwaves fake videos went viral in 2008 showing what appeared to be cell phones popping
Popcorn but as you can see if you try this for yourself it’s bogus the experts sounding the alarm on the harms of RF exposure are not doing so because of its very low heat emissions but from the growing evidence that suggests the continuous use of our wireless
Devices come with side effects we know that radio frequency radiation of 3G and 4G are associated with the whole variety of different human health effects Current public exposure levels are at least one quintilian that’s 18 zeros one quintilian times above natural background radiation according to Professor o Johansson of The kolinska
Institute in Sweden and there are studies for instance on the bloodb brain barrier leakage uh where the rats were exposed for 1 minute not one year or anything like 1 minute and at an very low exposure level compared to what you and I should stand and they got this
Dramatic leakage of the blood brain barrier the bloodb brain barrier is a filtering mechanism in the brain that blocks the passage of certain substances once compromised it becomes more porous allowing bacteria and other toxins to infect the brain tissue resulting in inflammation or sometimes death the barrier can be compromised from blunt
Force trauma high blood pressure developmental disorders and exposure to radiation including microwave radiation this leakage is more common among children because a child’s skull is much thinner in the Journal of microscopy and Ultra structure authors conducted a meta analysis of peer-reviewed cell phone exposure studies from 2009 to 2014
Concluding that children and unborn babies do face a greater risk for bodily damage that results from microwave radiation given off by wireless devices this is happens to be called a te s 593 M so you can see it’s ranging from. 5.7 there is no safety level for microwave radiation for
Children not one the brain of a child absorbs twice as much radiation as an adult that’s a stunning fact okay folks a 100 times higher than what I’m calling an increasing number of countries around the world are Banning the use of WiFi in schools Israel as well as France as well
As Belgium and Taiwan on there’s an active government program to discourage the use of mobile devices by young children now he in airplane mode so I feel okay just to show you this why why would you ever do this to yourself the cell phone radiation gets all the way
Through into the eyes of a child age six that might have a phone next to their brain the consequences remember that brain is not protected with myelin and therefore the exposures of anything to it are going to have a greater impact the education department says it follows World guidelines on Wi-Fi and advises
Schools to limit children’s exposure you are putting it over here this is called the temporal portion of your skull Dr David Carpenter is a world-renowned expert in environmental toxins in Albany New York the weight of the evidence demonstrates clearly that exposure to radio frequency radiation causes disease the evidence is strongest for
Cancer the thinnest bone in your body which which gives the most likelihood that that radiation is going to penetrate into your brain and if you’re a child that bone is even thinner this is why this is a really serious in issue in Children one reason scientists study rats is because their genetic biological and behavior characteristics closely resemble those of humans and many symptoms of human conditions can be replicated in mice and rats and this is Dr Leaf Salford he’s a neurosurgeon at lond University Hospital and chairman of the Department of neurosurgery since the
Late 1990s he’s led a team of researchers who have exposed thousands of laboratory rats to cell phone radiation showing that even a very small amount can damage the bloodb brain barrier his results have remained consistent and he calls the potential implications of his results terrifying we learned that the rats that
Had the lowest energy L not 1 watt per kilo not 100 m per kilo not even 10 m per Kil but 1 m per kilo and even .1 m per kilo are those energies that open the drood barrier most efficiently shut him up we have a lot invested in this ride shut him
Up many ask however if cell phones are damaging the blood brain barrier why haven’t we seen a rise in brain tumors or brain cancer since 1980s when cell phones started to come out till today there’s no change in the incident of brain cancer in the United States in
Australia in Europe all of them there were studies done showing no real difference this fails to consider latency which is the amount of time that elapses between initial exposure and the diagnosis of cancer from studies of the Hiroshima bombing we know that brain cancer did not show up at all as
Increased until 40 years after that bombing occurred if there was a real hazard out there but it could be another 15 years before we see it think about the billions of people who are being exposed to cell phone RF on a regular basis we can’t undo that exposure
But even if one completely dismisses the reality of latency evidence shows that a particular kind of tumor has risen substantially but the rise is difficult to find given the straight line in the mean average rates of gly blastoma otherwise called Goma or GBM AR Rising with the
Placement of the tumor occurring in the temporal and frontal lobes in one study titled brain tumors rise in gleo blastoma author stated in the abstract that this rise is mostly hidden in the overall data by A reduced incidence of lower grade tumors the World Health Organization says there are some indications of an
Increased risk of Goma for those who reported the highest 10% of cumulative hours of cell phone use the reality is there’s a significant increase in geol blastomas unfortunately they’re very very deadly I have listed peer-reviewed studies establishing the connection between non-thermal radio frequency radiation from cell phones and brain cancer known as gleo
Blastoma the wh has classified EMF as possibly carcinogenic to humans group 2B a category used when a causal Association is considered credible a study in Sweden published by Environmental Research in public health reported that brain tumors increased from 2007 to 2015 saying the use of WI wireless phones should be considered in
Relation to the change of incidence rates according to the Journal of environmental health long-term mobile phone use shows an almost doubling of the risk of head tumors in the Journal of Environmental Research states that long-term use of mobile phones shows a decreased survival of Goma patients claiming that RF exposure should be
Regarded as a human carcinogen now watch what happens when I move away seven under 10 so just by moving the distance 2 or 3T you’re reducing the radiation by 90% one might be thinking however that these studies are correlation causation fallacies just because there’s a rise in gleo blastomas doesn’t mean it’s because
Of our cell phones but in 2016 findings from a massive $30 million study by the national toxicology program were made public a major US Government study on rats finds a link between cell phones and cancer very first government study linking the radiation from cell phones to cancer two decade $30 million Federal
Study out today found there is some evidence of a link between cell phone radiation and brain cancer the study was led by Dr David McCormack at the Illinois Institute of Technology where they expose rats to the same radiation emitted from cell phones if this study had found no effects at all then we
Could much more easily dismiss previous studies linking long-term cellone use to the Goma tumor but that’s not what happened and then they found a link to two types of tumors right uh gomas and schomas bok’s brain the top quarter responsible for Body Balance has had to be removed after surgeons found this
Vast tumor right where he held the phone ntp uses four categories to summarize the evidence that a substance may cause cancer no evidence equivocal evidence some evidence and clear evidence they found clear evidence of Goma tumors this supports earlier findings associating gomas with long-term exposure to RF radiation from cell phones these results
Are quite important because the incidence of the brain tumors and theonas of the heart support that IR conclusion based on gomas and acoustic Nomas among long-term cell phone users some argue however that the levels used in this study were much higher than those we were ever exposed to but this
Rebuke has been largely overblown our studies are designed specifically to mimic the human exposure scenario the ntp studies are looking at exposures for 10 hours a day there’s heavy cell phone users that may approach the 10hour mark that may be excessive but it allows us to fully investigate whether or not
There is an effect of cell phone frequency radiation many who say this study’s RF levels were much higher than what we’ve ever been exposed to might not be considering a variety of factors for instance have you ever had poor cell reception a new study shows that using
Your cell phone in certain areas can increase your exposure to radiation by 10,000 times Scientists at the California Department of Public Health show the lower your cell phone reception is especially if it’s very low the higher the radiation with the weak signal what happens is your phone puts out a lot more radiation to make the connection with the cell tower so this would strongly urge people
That people should not use cell phones in elevators or moving vehicles on public transit because not only are you exposing yourself to very high levels of cell phone radiation you’re exposing all those people near you also what happens when my house has Smart Meters just outside of it and I’m inside using my
Phone while also watching a smart TV with my router in the same room and my tablet which I’m not using but is still on and sending and receiving radio frequency waves to the tower outside my neighborhood 900 times a second and which usually holds two to five antennas
Inside of it is right next to me haven’t you ever tried to sign onto your Wi-Fi only to notice multiple other accounts pop up those are also adding higher levels of EMF on top of everything else that was just mentioned in normal mode my iPhone registered 286 molt per meter
But watch what happens when I turn on the Bluetooth Wi-Fi and make a phone call now the RF radiation jumps to a high reading of nearly 6 volts per meter compared to 286 molts that’s 20 times more radiation your level of exposure also depends on where you live this
Graph is a country comparison of RF exposure guidelines set by the government measured in microwatts per centimeter as you’ll notice salsburg leitstein Bulgaria and LU ber are all below 3 microwatt per centimeter Switzerland uses 4.25 for schools and hospitals and 9.5 for the general Republic China’s limit is set at 10: and
In the good old USFA
