Pray for longevity not just for me but for our entire species know that I would never harm myself nor anyone else for that matter nevertheless if my life has to face certain challenges so that this planet can be saved please do not let these trials that I may have to face be
In vain and pray for me as I am praying for you sincerely Terence deshan Howard May 25th 2019 just so that it would always be known you know I should never walk out there alone or harm myself so if something happens to me and someone says
That um he committed and he did know I would never ever do that know that somebody else did that and uh I’m not going to allow that to happen what you are about to encounter will Challenge and potentially redefine your perception of reality this journey will shake the
Very foundations of our understanding of the world world every belief every piece of knowledge you hold dear will be scrutinized questioned and potentially transformed as we delve into this profound exploration a veil will be lifted from your eyes Illuminating truths previously obscured and you will
Begin to see the world in a new light it is with profound respect and deep gratitude that we acknowledge Terence Howard’s Monumental contribution to this Awakening the book we’re about to engage with is not just a collection of pages or ideas it is a gateway to a new understanding a testament to terence’s
Dedication to uncovering and sharing the truth his decision to make this book freely available is a gift of immeasurable value reflecting his genuine desire to Enlighten and Empower us all Terrence Howard has devoted his life to the pursuit of knowledge to challenging the status quo and to seeking answers to the fundamental
Questions that Define our existence his work is an invitation to embark on a journey of Discovery to question the narratives we’ve been taught and to open our minds to the infinite possibilities that lie Beyond conventional understanding for making this knowledge accessible to everyone for striving to awaken Humanity to a broader
Comprehension of our universe we extend our heartfelt thanks to Terrence the generosity in sharing his life’s work without expecting anything in return is a rare and Noble act that deserves our deepest appreciation now before we delve into the groundbreaking insights of Terence Howard’s work I have to show you
What Joe Rogan has to say about this remarkable individual Terrence Howard uh the guy who interviewed me for Rolling Stone told me that Terence Howard is like a legitimate genius like he’s like he talk to the guy the guy is absolutely brilliant maybe figured it all out like
He was using it wasn’t like nonsense talk right he was like like oh this is like shockingly coherent thing to say I think it’s necessary to understand just how much of a genius this man is considering what we’re about to discover so please watch the entire video because
We need to grasp this information fully and if you think it’s important please share the video give it a like and comment your thoughts on this it will help ensure the video doesn’t get buried Let’s help promote his work and idas this wonderful individual has taken a dangerously Brave decision to speak the
Truth truth so at least this we can do let’s share it thank you I’ve spent 45 years searching these things out and trying to figure out what the universe really how it really worked we will start by reading a few words from Terence Howard left in the book as a
Cautionary note or guidance for us all I encourage you not to become frightened but brace yourselves because the things being discussed within the pages of this book will shake the very Foundation of our understanding of the world everything that you think you know about what you know will be called into
Question a tidal wave of refreshing truth is being released upon this dark and muddied world you are about to Embark upon a journey into a forbidden subject one that tackles a question in mathematics that has never been asked publicly it is a subject considered so taboo that not one paper or book has
Been written upon this topic in modernity if the information in this book is is heated then this species called mankind will have the keys necessary for an eternally sustainable existence if not this species will suffer the same fate as the trilobites that crawled across the ocean floor some
500 million years ago Extinction our species will pass away and be remembered only for our ignorance that is of course if our fossils survive L enough for a more advanced race to find them the truth is that everyone is just afraid of this to IPC because of the potential consequences associated with disclosing
The true value of the number one also the fears associated with exposing the inconsistencies that govern the current practices of multiplication division and how these are applied to science unfortunately every country in the Civilized world has their economy rooted in the value that has been placed upon
The number one and from its valuation the world calculates interest rates salaries tariffs taxes Etc all of these calculations are based upon how the number one is Multiplied and divided as a result the world’s Math Makes dollars but it doesn’t make sense and I think it’s time to start right at the very
Beginning and walk through walk through this thing so the question for the Church of Truth love and Consciousness and all those listening does a dollar time a dollar equal $1 or does a dollar time a dollar equal $2 I have never seen anywhere in the universe where an action times an action
Doesn’t have a reaction so now that that’s why we need to discuss this and examine it and how they came up with this strange number that which is illogical because an area a length times a length has to have an area so you can’t have an 1 time one having equaling
One one because now what happened to the length times the length it’s the area is no longer in existence Taren starts by posing an intriguing question money can’t be multiplied or can it a penny time a penny equals what since the penny is no longer based upon the hard asset
Of gold and is now based upon an imaginary value that is equal to a virtual value of the integers or numbers then if follows 1 Penny * 1 Penny equal 1 penny according to the rules of current mathematics and multiplication 1 Penny * 1 Penny equals 2 pennies
According to the laws of universal mathematics 1 Penny * 1 Penny equal 0.001 according to a calculator a penny * a penny 0.01 * 0.01 = 0.001 does a penny * a penny equal 1 Penny based upon the rules of multiplication or does a penny * a penny equal
0.001 based upon our current Decimal System a value so small that there isn’t even a currency circulated for that amount by the US Department of Treasury all calculations shown here are reasonable forms of multiplication but which one remains consistent with observed Universal phenomena how would you like your money calculated a nickel
Time a nickel equals what a nickel is equivalent to 5 pennies then a nickel time a nickel should also equal a quarter a nickel * a nickel according to the calculator is 05 * 05 equal .25 again a value so small that there is not a currency circulated to represent
It how would you like your money calculated a dime time a dime equals what a dime is equivalent to 10 pennies a dime time a dime should be equivalent to 10 pennies * 10 pennies 10 pennies * 10 pennies is equivalent to 100 pennies
Which is equal to a do but a dime time a dime equals a penny according to a calculator 0.10 * 0.10 = 0.01 how would you like your money calculated what is a quarter * a quarter a quarter is equal to 25 pennies therefore a quar * A4 equal 25 pennies *
25 pennies which equal 6 25 pennies which is $6.25 yet A4 time a quarter according to the calculator is 0625 .25 * .25 = 0625 how would you like your money calculated allow me to Enlighten you if 4 over2 is the inverse operation of 2 * 2 equaling
4 then it would naturally follow that 2 / 1 or 2 over one is the inverse operation of 1 * 1 equaling 2 so let’s talk about this what does your common sense tell you about these two scenarios what do they have in common and what are their differences division the number
Four is divided by two twice and the truth is the number two is divided by one twice the proof of that if you had2 dolls and split it between two people you would have to give each person in $1 in order for it to be even
In addition 2 + 2 = 4 and 1 + 1 = 2 subtraction 4 – 2 = 2 and 2 – 1 = 1 multiplication 2 * 2 = 4 and 1 * 1 = 1 does that make sense to anybody there does that seem like it’s following
Any similar line of of congruency I mean and you see where the mistake has occurred both of these scenarios are identical in every way the only difference exists in dimension alone if they add subtract and divide according to the same ratio then they must also multiply according to the same ratio
Plain and simple if 2 over 1 is inconsistent with 1 * 1 equaling 1 although 4 over two is consistent with 2 * 2 equaling 4 then it should follow that 22 = 4 which it does and 1^2 = 2 yet the math and scientific Community
Tells us that common sense and logic are wrong in this case because of a product of an arbitrary convention called the identity property let’s discuss in mathematics an identity element or neutral element is a special elements such as zero in the set of all integers under addition or one in the set of
Positive integers under multiplication with a special set of powers that enables it the ability to defy the laws of physics on two of its primary founding assumptions first of all concerning the number one in the case of one times itself or any other number or variable the end product is that same
Number or variable and that any number multiplied by a zero equals a z as a result of this arbitrary rule we are left with two false statements two unnatural scenarios that makes it necessary for the fundamental laws of physics concerning action and necessary reaction and the laws concerning the
Conservation of energy to be suspended in order for this identity rule to exist 1 * 1 equaling 1 is Paramount to an action time action without a reaction in mathematics an identity element or neutral element is a special type of element of a set with with respect to a
Binary operation on the set which leaves other elements unchanged when combined with them like a ghost or a shadowy influence upon nothing at all yet it Alters the natural course of any number it supposedly encounters therefore in the case of one it is left without a mate an equal and oppositely balanced
Condition because it remains unchanged when other ones are combined or attempt to Simply multiply a state of existence that is impossible in this Universe of equilibrium because the rule of nature is to First divide accumulated matter by the process of radiation and expansion which is the work of magnetism and then
To multiply that which has been divided through the process of centripetal gravitative contraction which is the office of electricity secondly on the identity of zero in multiplication any number multiplied by zero will become a zero product first thing in order to multiply something by something else they must be dimensionally equal then
How do you make something dimensionally equal to nothing the laws of conservation of energy might as well pack up and move away because how can a something multiplied by nothing cause the something to disappear remember energy cannot be created or destroyed yet in the case of multiplication a
Process by which all things continue to exist and propagate their existence zero behaves as a black hole of the number system that gobbles down anything that comes near it a concept that doesn’t exist except in outdated science fiction novels how in the world have these two false statements been
Positioned as the unquestionable god rules of mathematics for the last 6,000 years How Deeply has this lie been interwoven into the very DNA of our approach to mathematics a false Axiom presented by an individual whose thoughts and ideologies have crafted our misinterpretation of the universe which makes that person possibly the most
Influential person throughout all of history we will now allow nature and the testimony of universal phenomenon to answer these questions as we put this concept of the identity element to the test with 1 * 1 equaling 1 and the future of mathematics weighing in the balance
1 * 1 equals 1 or so we’ve been taught we were taught around this very impressionable time that Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny were also real yet over the next few years we ultimately came to terms with the fact that our trimes were far too narrow for a jolly old fellow to
Climb down the assertion that 1 * 1 equals 1 was implanted in our minds at a young impressionable age a time when questioning the accuracy of what we’re taught is and typical as adults however our beliefs need to be grounded in strong convincing arguments backed by natural phenomena concrete evidence and
Irrefutable facts every adult holds responsibility for their beliefs and the ideas they spread into the world especially those that significantly impact our understanding of the universe therefore Terence boldly challenges the long-held belief that 1 * 1 equals 1 proposing instead that 1 * 1 = 2 this
Assertion is based on the premise the multiplication inherently means an increase in number or quantity if the result doesn’t show an increase it defies the fundamental concept of multiplication this is the Undisputed definition of the word to multiply Terren Howard suggests that merely redefining multiplication or questioning the identity element in mathematics
Might not be enough to sway deeply rooted beliefs he recognizes the challenge in altering a philosophy so integral to our world economy pondering what it would take to Enlighten this generation and steer them away from a path potentially misguided for over 6,000 years Terrence points out that multiplication governed by the
Commutative and associative laws essentially involves adding a number to itself as indicated by another number he argues that by these laws 1 * 1 should logically equal two challenging the conventional identity property which he sees as suspending fundamental Laws of Motion he invites us to consider what’s more plausible questioning observable physical
Phenomena or an arbitrary mathematical rule intriguingly Terren notes that throughout history no great thinker or Observer of natural phenomena has ever reported 1 Time 1 equating to one so suggesting that nature doesn’t conform to human mathematics he finds it surprising that no one has publicly challenged this notion before as it
Seems to have been ingrained in our minds from an early age before we could discern truth from fiction Terrence Howard prompts us to question the fundamental principle of mathematics how did we come to believe that an action times an action equals a non-reaction he speculates on the potential repercussions in the
Mathematical and scientific community if the identity element were proven false questioning the stability of Institutions built upon this foundational belief the number one is the very first quantity of any measurable space the lowest Cardinal number because half of two is one also it encompasses all of the total potential energy within the
Entirety of what we call Visible matter in astrophysics this is expressed in the notion of The Singularity where everything is compressed and represented within the quantity of the number one singular now there are many within the scientific community that would say you cannot equate numerical values to physical occurrences this is what doctor
Neil degrass Tyson told me they assert that the use of mathematics is more of a tool for measurement and not the measurement itself the assertation is that the term Singularity is not a literal term but more of a concept and cannot be viewed as a quantity to be
Perfectly honest the entire notion of a singularity where all matter collapses upon itself and all the laws of physics breaks down is inconsistent with natural phenomena and lives more in the realm of Science Fiction than reality yet many within the field of astrophysics firmly ascribe to this imaginative mathematical
Impossibility what is this thing called one and how can it or the concept of it be shrouded in so much mystery and controversy the number one actually has the same foundational and patriarchal relationship with all other numbers that are descended from it just as the element hydrogen has with all other
Elements that occur after it it just so happens to be the most abundant element within the known universe in view of this relationship let’s compare our number sequence to the periodic table and the elements that make it up in his insightful discussion on the periodic table of elements Taran how
Delves into the foundational similarities between the structure of the universe and our mathematical systems he begins with a profound statement in our number system all the numbers have something in common every number following the number one is a product of the number one this assertion sets the stage for a compelling analogy
Between the Simplicity and complexity of the universe’s building blocks and the fundamental principles of mathematics look at what teren says here about the human body and cells as an analogy for understanding complex systems from simple Origins this perspective is crucial because it encapsulates the essence of how complex forms emerge from
Simple Beginnings just as the human body a complex organism is composed of trillions of cells each serving different functions yet originating from a common cellular structure the universe’s elements share a similar pattern of complexity from Simplicity Terren takes us further into the atomic level explaining that atoms the basic
Units of chemical elements consist of protons electrons and neutrons he highlights a crucial point every single element within the visible Universe has a common ancestry with the element hydrogen this statement is pivotal because it echoes his earlier point about the number one’s role in mathematics just as all numbers derive
From one all elements can trace their lineage back to hydrogen the simplest element the periodic table teren explained ples is not just a static chart of elements but a dynamic predictor of atomic structures based on conditions such as motion and pressure he uses the formation of ice as a
Metaphor to elucidate how conditions affect the state of matter much like how environmental factors determine the state and behavior of elements like hydrogen terrence’s exploration of hydrogen’s behavior under various conditions across the solar system serves as a master class in the adaptability and transformation of elements he says Under The Limited
Influence of lower pressures from the Sun in a more vacuous environment hydrogen atoms expand and become more tenuous in their configurations this adaptability is a testament to the universal principle of change based on environmental conditions a principle that applies both to the cosmos and to the foundational rules of mathematics now consider terrence’s
Critique of the identity property in mathematics which posits that high hydrogen multiplied by hydrogen would only yield hydrogen contradicting the observable universe where elements combine and transform this according to Terren illustrates a fundamental disconnect between mathematical principles and natural phenomena challenging the notion that 1 * 1 equal
1 when in fact nature demonstrates that combining elements or numbers can yield new complex outcomes terence’s discussions on diatomic hydrogen H2 being the product of two hydrogen atoms H * H = H2 not merely adding but combining to form a new entity is particularly enlightening it underscores his argument that the Universe operates
On principles of combination and transformation principles that are mathematical systems should reflect to accurately describe the natural world in essence Terrence Howard invites us to reconsider our understanding of the universe’s Fabric and the mathematical laws we used to describe it he argues for a model that Embraces the complexity
And dynamism of nature suggesting that just as elements like hydrogen can combine and transform under varying conditions our mathematical principles must also be adaptable and reflective of the universe’s inherent complexity this journey towards understanding the true nature of things as teren suggests is not just a scientific or mathematical
Endeavor but a profound EXP ation of the fundamental truths that govern our existence in this intriguing exploration teren delves into the fascinating realm of light and perception challenging our understanding of the universe and the mathematical principles we hold as truths let’s break down his thought-provoking insights and see how
They align with our agreement on his perspective teren starts with the simple question posed about the equation 1 * 1 = 1 drawing an analogy with a mirror to elucidate his point he says my second grade teacher told our class that we should imagine that you looking at the
Number one in the mirror this analogy sets the stage for a deeper discussion on the nature of light and perception urging us to question our fundamental understanding of multiplication and reflection look at what tan says about light light is an effect of electromagnetic radiation that falls within a particular portion of the
Electr magnetic Spectrum he simplifies this complex phenomenon to its Essence light enables us to see yet our perception of it is incredibly limited covering only about 0.35% of the electromagnetic spectrum this Revelation is startling as it metaphorically renders Humanity almost blind in the Universal context depending heavily on a minuscule fraction of the
Spectrum for our understanding of the world around us terrence’s discussion extends to the limitations of human perception and the implications for our comprehension of the universe consequently how much can we trust her view of her world and of the universe as a whole based upon this limited Vision he asks challenging the
Reliability of conclusions drawn from our constrained sensory experiences this skepticism extends to the mathematical equations we use to define and understand our reality including the fundamental equation eal MC 2 which he interprets as illustrating that all things are light everything just happens to be light existing under different motion and
Pressure conditions mass and energy are both are different manifestations of the same thing a somewhat unfamiliar conception for the average mind furthermore the equation E is equal m c² in which energy is put equal to mass multiplied with the square of the velocity of light show that very small
Amount of mass may be converted into a very large amount of energy and with the Earth the mass and energy were in fact equivalent according to the formula mentioned before this was demonstrated by KRA and walon in 1932 experimentally one of the most compelling points Terrence makes is
About the crystallization of matter from light under varying conditions of pressure and motion he explains this occurs because light waves exert enormous pressure waves upon everything it encounters which ultimately freeze and crystallize into every form of visible matter depending upon the pressure and motion conditions of that system this perspective fascinatingly
Parallels the behavior of water under different temperatures and states underscoring the transformative power of environmental conditions on matter perhaps the most revolutionary idea Terren presents is the notion that light which many organisms consume directly or indirectly for energy might itself be alive therefore it is reasonable to conclude that since so many organisms
Feed directly from light then perhaps light itself is also alive this thought invites us to Ponder the intrinsic nature of light and its role in the universe challenging the boundaries between living and non-living entities when discussing how light interacts with mirrors teren provides a compelling argument for re-evaluating our
Understanding of multiplication in order for us to see the number one in front of a mirror we need to employ the use of light well how does light interact with a mirror if we were to place a candle in front of a mirror and used a light sensor the measurement of light observed
Will be more than the light produced by one candle this observation that a mirror reflecting light creates an effect greater than the single Source serves as a metaphor for rethinking 1 * 1 equals 1 through this lens teren suggests that 1 * 1 indeed equals more than just one urging a reconsideration
Of how we perceive and calculate the fundamental principles of our universe Terence Howard’s exploration into the nature of light and perception is not just an academic exercise but a profound invitation to rethink the way we understand the universe and the mathematical laws we assume to govern it
His insights challenge us to expand our perspective beyond the limitations of our sensory experiences and the traditional Frameworks of Science and Mathematics in his exploration of sound and its wave Dynamics teren Howard delves into the profound interconnectedness of sound light and the fabric of the universe he challenges conventional scientific perspectives
With compelling arguments inviting us to reconsider how we perceive and understand the natural world Terrence introduces the concept with a powerful quote attributed to Pythagoras a rock is nothing but Frozen music this idea that a rock is essentially compressed sound waves with mass weight and dimension
Sets a tone of Wonder and curiosity it suggests that every everything around us no matter how solid or innert it appears is imbued with a kind of vibrational energy or music reflect on what Taren says about the nature of sound if we say aloud 1 time one we have created two
Separate and distinct waveforms he posits that these frequencies Traverse the universe touching everything in their path and altering every structure within both the visible and invisible Realms this perspective underscores the idea of universal connectivity how a single vibration can resonate and adjust the balance across the cosmos requiring
Potentially eons for the universe to equalize to new conditions terrence’s analogy of dropping a pebble into a lake to illustrate Soundwave Dynamics vividly captures the essence of vibrational impact just as ripples in a lake interact with their environment soundwaves or our voices in the Lake of the universe perpetuate endlessly
Influencing and being infu infuenced by The Cosmic fabric challenging a statement by Dr Neil degrass Tyson Terren argues against the notion that sound cannot travel through the vacuum of space He suggests that space is not a vacuum but is filled with the most wonderful vibrating pre-atomic geometry this assertion is crucial for
Understanding terence’s Viewpoint that all things in the universe are interconnected contradicting the idea of isolated systems Terren intriguingly proposes that sound and and light are fundamentally similar differing only in their wave frequencies this concept is beautifully illustrated by his explanation of converting sound frequencies to reveal their color within
The visible light spectrum like Einstein said everything is relative teren notes emphasizing the interconnectedness and relativity of all phenomena in discussing the propagation of sound through space Terence critiques The Limited vision of modern science which fails to recognize the field nature of what is perceived as a vacuum he uses
The example of a Geer counter to illustrate that space far from being empty teams with subatomic particles and radiation thereby facilitating the transmission of sound as variations in electromagnetic fields terence’s exploration culminates in the assertion that by simply uttering 1 Time 1 we generate two distinct waveforms that
Will resonate through the universe for billions of years this idea not only challenges our understanding of sound and light but also invites us to contemplate the lasting impact of our actions and words on the cosmos then again it could be argued that we are only thinking or imagining 1
Time one if so let us now consider how thoughts are formed in the mind and let’s examine the hidden processes by which our brains do this thing called thinking as information is funneled into the brain through various receptors located on the human body and are analyzed as thoughts they are reborn as
Newly formatted electrical impulses these impulses are different from the state by which they entered your sensory organs because now they have been transmuted by your brain’s narcissistic editorial process it interprets all things according to its own image thoughts are generated inside a neuron As Told by modern science as an
Electrical impulse a frequency that travels along the Axion where it encounters a neural transmission fluid after which it is converted into Electro SL chemical energy afterwards it is carried through that fluid on a wave in its chemical State until it reaches the dendrites of a neighboring neuron where
It converts again into electrical energy within this process of electrical energy being converted into chemical energy and Back Again into electrical energy a measurable wave field is generated and with each conversion that wave field intensifies the simple Act of thinking or imagining 1 Time 1 creates a large
Enough impulse that it can be measured through eegs electroencephalograms eegs are measurements of voltage fluctuations from Electric wave motions within the neurons of the brain brain wave frequency is measured in Hertz in the same manner that musical tones are measured therefore if you think 1 Time 1
You have created two separate wave forms two separate songs of continually converting energy that travels from the brain through the skull and out into the universe where it can be interpreted by simple electronic measuring and monitoring devices those two thoughts about the multiplication of those two numbers creates two separate wave fields
That will transfer their wave amplitude upon everything in existence until time indefinite therefore even the act of thinking 1 * 1 creates at least two equal and opposite consequences each of them will have both a positive charge and a negative discharge which in turn will have at the very least two separate
And distinct consequences that will double into four and then 8 16 32 64 Etc do you see my point everything is affected by everything else there aren’t any isolated states of being where anything exists within a vacuum without the consequence of multi-dimensional chain reactions likewise even the act of
Thinking 1 Time 1 the consequence is equal at least two if we were to take into consideration Newton’s third law of motion which states for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction for if 1 * 1 ever equaled just one then two forces or substances will have interacted without any reaction
Therefore either Newton’s third law is fundamentally flawed or 1 * 1 must equal at the very least two I’d like for you to take partic particular interest in Newton’s ideas concerning mass and its attraction to other objects of mass Within These Concepts rest another
Obvious proof of 1 * 1 equal 2 in nature gravity which directly correlates to the mass of an object as taught by modern science is represented through values in our current number system examine for instance the tedious process of collecting data and the arduous task of processing that data do you recall how
The human mind collects widths of information from multiple forms of stimuli it is initially routed from the sensory organ to the thalamus where it is converted into electrical impulses those impulses are then converted into chemical structures that represent the data remember that a chemical is composed of elements and each element
Has a particular mass and mass is determined through a consideration of force in Newtonian terms f is equal to ma nevertheless if one mass time 1 Mass equals only one mass then there wouldn’t be any such thing as the electrical effects that have been labeled as gravity to initially accumulate the
Matter into a mass in fact it would create the opposite effect of gravity for every Mass would effectively repel every other Mass our universe would never come into fruition therefore in order for there to be the effect of gravity 1 * 1 must equal at least two
Finally I believe it is important that we drive the point home that there is a deliberate untruth woven throughout the fabric of our mathematics and is embedded within the programs that run our calculators computers and our smartphones if you were to input the number two into your calculator and ask
For its square root you will receive the answer that we’ve mentioned numerous times before 1.414 213 562 37395 5 if you square that number x s the calculator will tell you the answer is 2 but if you add that number to itself or multiply it by two the result
Is 1.41 421 356 237 3095 plus 1.414 213 562 37395 equals 2.82 1842 7124 474 6190 surprisingly if you Cube this result of the square < TK of 2 1.414 213 562 37395 cubed according to the calculator you'll get 2.82 8427 1247 4619 now wait a minute that's the same Number that you get by adding the number to itself 1.4 41421 3562 37395 plus 1.414 213 562 37395 equal 2.82 8427 1247 46190 how is it possible for a number whether rational or irrational to have the same exact value when being added to itself or being multiplied by two as it Does when that number is cubed the only other number in like manner is zero because it is a non-number can this be a mistake the truth is 1 * 1 = 2 and 1 * 1al Ling one isn't multiplication it's a fabrication which is also known as a mathematical fallacy Howard identifies irrationality A condition where numbers cannot be expressed as simple fractions as a significant flaw within mathematics this flaw as highlighted by wildberger suggests a dissonance in mathematics that many practitioners choose to ignore despite its profound implications Howard's discussion extends Beyond a mere acknowledgement of this issue venturing into the consequences of Irrational numbers like pi and the square < TK of two especially when applied to Natural phenomena these numbers essential to the Pythagorean theorem and the Cal calculation of a circle circumference exemplify the clash between mathematical constructs and the observable universe's realities at the heart of Howard's critique is the Contention that ukian geometry and its derivatives rooted in the concept of straight lines and perfect shapes like the platonic solids failed to capture the universe's inherently curved nature he argues that Reliance on these linear models has led to a stalemate of reasoning where the tools we use to Describe the universe no longer align with its true structure the universe Howard posits is a living and breathing entity characterized by cycles of expansion and contraction that cannot be accurately represented by Static linear mathematical models Howard advocates for a paradigm shift in how we approach mathematics and its application to the Physical sciences He suggests that the natural world with its regular and predictable Cycles should dictate our mathematical models rather than abstract constructs that fail to mirror reality this approach necessitates abandoning the notion of straight lines and embracing the curvature that define space and time the all shape and tetr Terian wave state as introduced by Howard offer alternative models that better reflect the universe's curved and dynamic nature the call to redefine our mathematical understanding of the universe has far-reaching implications it challenges centuries of scientific thought and practice re requiring a re-evaluation of everything from the fundamental laws of physics to the Technologies we develop and rely on Howard's critique extends to the educational system which perpetuates these outdated models and the broader scientific Community which has been slow to recognize and address these foundational issues Howard's analysis grounded in the discrepancies between ukan geometry and the universe's true nature invites us to reconsider our Approach to understanding the C MOS by embracing a model of the universe that accounts for its inherent curvature and dynamism we can unlock a more accurate and holistic understanding of reality this shift while challenging holds the promise of aligning our scientific Pursuits with the natural laws that govern the universe leading to new Discoveries and advancements in our quests to comprehend the cosmos in the condition of one Terrence Howard embarks on a philosophical and scientific exploration of the concept of one delving into its structure and significance in the universe he intertwines Concepts from physics mathematics and metaphysics to present a Nuanced understanding of one as both the cumulative product of all things and the smallest reflection of the whole Terren Begins by referencing Albert Einstein's concept of a quanta or Quantum situating his discussion within the realm of multi-dimensional space/time he asserts that to perceive or measure the three known Dimensions height width and depth A separate and distinct dimensional plane of observation is necessary thus Terren argues there are at the very least four necessary dimensions for anything to exist within the visible Universe this perspective challenges the traditional three-dimensional Viewpoint and suggests a more complex structure of existence consider what Taren says about The nature of light light was the fastest known substance within the visible Universe until Berkland currents indicated that information in the electric currents traveled at speeds far superior to light he uses this to segue into a discussion on how light due to the curvature of space/time ultimately curves back onto its original position Completing a circuit this understanding of light leads to the concept of the all shape which Terren believes is the proper geometric representation of the reflection of one terrence's concept of the all shape is particularly intriguing he describes it as the system created where four expanding spheres intersect Forming a structure he calls a tetran wave state this structure according to teren represents the interconnected nature of all things within the universe furthermore teren discusses how all visible matter in the universe occurs within the confines of the vesap piscus of interacting and intersecting planes he emphasizes all things are one this Statement encapsulates the essence of his argument that at the core of all things the laws governing the simplest element hydrogen dictate the geometry of its byproducts and shapes which are all interconnected in his examination of matter Terren notes that all matter is both expanding and Contracting as per a Universal prime directive of existence he elaborates all matter must be congruent with all other matter meaning everything has a common denominator and can be reduced to its lowest term this idea of congruence and commonality leads to his assertion that the common factor or Quant of our universe is the Structure of one understanding this structure He suggests unifies all things through his unique lens Terence invites us to view the universe not as a collection of disperate parts but as a cohesive whole where every element every wave and every particle is intrinsically connected to form the singular reality Of one this exploration is not just a scientific or mathematical analysis it's a philosophical reflection on the unity and interconnectedness of all existence one we know the definition alone that to multiply means to make many or manifold to actually in increased in number or quantity therefore it must increase in size and Quantity or it is not multiplication consequently 1 * 1 = 1 could never be a part of the multiplication table because it fails to satisfy the definition of the term to multiply so by definition alone we have clear and rational proof that 1 * 1 can never equal just 1 we Also know that 1 * 1 equaling 1 is a false answer because the associative and commutative laws were not properly followed which left an unfinished and unbalanced equation also the identity property has thus been shown to be based upon an uninformed biased and arbitrary preconception that has no relative value In light of observed natural phenomena two although it is an acceptable phenomenon in the mathematic Community for the square root of a number less than one when added to itself to be greater than the initial number squared we are discussing the number two and its square root when added to itself should Never exceed the initial number for that would be highly irregular and completely unacceptable even in the loosefitting constraints of the laws of our current system of mathematics this anomal is not acceptable for anything that exists within the physical universe beyond our flawed system of mathematics meaning that no other system or organism within Our known universe behaves as our numeric system where one is massless weightless without Spin and lacking of any measurable effects when it interacts with itself or any other number that is derived from it this ultimately prevents the square root of two from having the natural and logical answer of one Remember an object must be equal to the sum of its parts it cannot be greater than nor less than itself this is just simple Common Sense therefore the square root of Any Given number when added to itself should should never exceed the initial number if it does then we have Overreached and the true square root of that number has failed to be satisfied three Newton's uncontested third law states every action has an equal and opposite reaction therefore 1 * 1 equaling 1 is a violation of every natural law regarding cause and effect within the known universe consequently 1 * 1 must equal at the very least two for four the Pythagorean theorem postulates that a^ 2 + b^2 = c^2 this unfortunately Corners mathematics into a stalemate of short-sighted reasoning because the side and the diagonal of The Square become incommensurable if both sides are positive integers five ukian geometry Gave birth to the platonic solids which were constructed with straight intersecting lines that do not exist in our universe of curved space/time attempting to describe our world and the underlying structure of the universe by straight lines seems as feudal an attempt as someone trying to capture the complexities of the entire human anatomy With stick figures it produces only a crude depiction of the true reality remember all energy in the universe is expressed in motion and all motion is expressed in waves and all waves are a function of a Vortex a spinning whirlpool and all Vortex functions are curved there are no straight lines in The Universe therefore there aren't any straight lines in Universal mathematics so there you have it five logic provoking reliable witnesses that testify to the unreasonable and illogically flawed basis that governs man's thinking upon these matters and is also the foundation of our system of multiplication money can't be multiplied Or can it money can be multiplied by a number but can it be multiplied by its self Terrence Howard critically examines the transition from a gold-based monetary system to a Fiat system exploring its implications on the nature of money and its multiplication his analysis touches on both the mathematical and conceptual aspects of Currency challenging the traditional Notions of value and multiplication in the context of modern economics Taran starts by posing an intriguing question money can't be multiplied or can it he then delves into the foundational principles of mathematics reminding us that everything has a common denominator and can be reduced to its lowest terms This approach He suggests should apply to money as well arguing that if the monetary value can be made equal to the number it's being multiplied by then theoretically money can be multiplied look at what teren says about the nature of money in the modern economy our paper money isn't a convenient representation Of anything except that of a very vivid imagination because our currency is no more valuable than the paper that it is printed upon this statement highlights the Crux of his argument about the Fiat system the US dollar once anchored to the gold standard offered a tangible value however Post Its Detachment from Gold it became a virtual entity susceptible to manipulation and devoid of a solid backing Terren explains the historical context of the shift citing President Franklin D Roosevelt's 1933 mandate and President Nixon's 197 1 decision to officially take the US off the gold standard he illustrates how these actions led to a global shift Towards fak currencies essentially transforming them into digital markers in a binary system devoid of intrinsic value this transformation according to teren has profound implications when the world governments ceased to base their currencies upon hard assets at that moment all currency became nothing more than virtual digital markers he argued That in such a system money becomes an abstract concept easily manipulated and multiplied within the confines of a computer program much like imaginary numbers in mathematics Terren also touches on the concept of fractionalization in currency highlighting how the value of a dollar can vary based on its subdivision into
Smaller units like quarters or pennies this variability He suggests further complicates the notion of a stable unified value for money this is a call to reexamine our understanding of value currency and the principles of multiplication in the context of a global economy that has moved away from tangible assets through this exploration
Terence challenges us to rethink the nature of money and its role in our society highlighting the complexities and potential pitfalls of a system increasingly detached from physical reality now that I’ve explained one way that money can be multiplied and some historical examples would you like like to see what could be possibly taking
Place behind the hidden walls of the financial World a penny time a penny equals what since the penny is no longer based upon the hard asset of gold and is now based upon an imaginary value that is equal to a virtual value of the integers or numbers then it follows 1
Penny * 1 Penny equal 1 penny according to the rules of current mathematics and multiplication 1 Penny * 1 Penny equals 2 pennies according to the laws of universal mathematics 1 Penny * 1 Penny equal 0.00001 according to a calculator a penny * a penny 0.01 * 0.01 equal
0.00001 does a penny * a penny equal one penny based upon the rules of multiplication or does a penny * a penny equal 0.00001 based upon our current Decimal System a value so small that there isn’t even a currency circulated for that amount by the US Department of Treasury
All calculation shown here are reasonable forms of multiplication but which one remains consistent with observed Universal phenomena how would you like your money calculated a nickel time a nickel equals what a nickel is equivalent to 5 pennies then a nickel time a nickel should also equal a quarter a nickel times a nickel
According to the calculator is 0 5 * 05 = .25 again a value so small that there is not a currency circulated to represent it how would you like your money calculated a dime time a dime equals what a dime is the equivalent to 10 pennies a dime time a dime should be
Equivalent to 10 pennies * 10 pennies 10 pennies * 10 pennies is equivalent to 100 pennies which is equal to a do but a dime times a dime equals a penny according to a calculator 0.10 * 0.10 = 0.01 how would you like your money calculated what is a quarter * a quarter
A quarter is equal to 25 pennies therefore A4 * A4 equal 25 pennies * 25 pennies which equals 625 pennies which is $6.25 yet a quarter * a quarter according to the calculator is 0625 .25 * .25 = 0625 how would you like your money calculated as you can clearly see for
All of our unfortunate lives and for most of Mankind’s chaotic existence upon this planet under the false Banner of a civilized society we’ve been if I may borrow a phrase or two from the legendary civil rights leader Malcolm X we’ve been misled bamboozled we’ve been had Hoodwinked conned taken advantage of
Taken for a ride around the proverbial block taken to the cleaners and we’ve been taken to the bank literally the British just so happen to have a phrase that they used to describe someone who is short-sighted and a tad bit slow when it comes to finances they call it being
Pennywise and pound foolish unfortunately that describes 99.9% of the past and present populations of the world nevertheless the proverbial buck stops here all pun intended
