Elections right that’s basically what they’re saying it says Republicans on the house oversight committee confronted several Twitter and I’ll show you some videos in a minute we’ll go into this confronted several former Twitter Executives on Wednesday about their censorship activism and election meddling specifically the big Tech company’s suppression of the New York
Post’s legitimate reporting about Hunter Biden’s laptop Twitter LED big tech companies and corporate media in throttling the news of the hunter Biden’s family uh Biden family’s deep corruption mere weeks before the 2020 presidential election James Clapper is actually coming out now and being like because remember that he he was a
Former CIA director he’s coming out now being like oh well we thought that it might have been Russian disinformation and so of course he and others wrote this whole piece claiming it was Russian disinformation and then you had Twitter and Facebook and other companies go on a mass censorship spree where they were
Silencing legitimate news coverage on Hunter Biden’s laptop um really in my opinion collusion and Corruption between big government frankly the intelligence the whole intelligence community and big business that was used to alter the outcome of the 2020 election remember just on polling data uh the hunter Biden laptop
Scandal would have flipped the election if we just go by polling data um if you write off election fraud right now it says the decision as the recent release of the Twitter files under Elon musk’s further further exposed was motivated by partisanship in other words by politics political interest not Twitter policy
It says as committee chairman representative James Comer made clear at the beginning of the hearing the oversight questioning on Wednesday was about exposing the relationship between big tech companies like Twitter and corrupt partisan federal agencies like the FBI it says which tried its best to kill scrutiny of the Biden family
Business ahead of the 2020 election there’s a quote here from Comer he says Twitter’s employees made censorship decisions on the Fly often not following the company’s own policy publicly stated policies it worked hand in hand Twitter with the FBI to monitor the protected speech of Americans receiving millions of tax
Dollars to do so you getting that the Biden Administration well actually it was Trump at this time but under the FBI right well actually actually later too this was following that and ahead of it and following it the FBI was paying people at Twitter your tax money the money you pay every
Year to the government or taking a paycheck every month part of that money was going to pay people at Twitter to monitor you to watch what you’re saying on the internet and then to use that to censor people who were talking about in many cases legitimate factually accurate information that was against the
Political interest of the individuals both of the FBI and at Twitter who did not want you to speak the truth and they censored you using your money to do it and it says this is coal merceding quote a stating quote Twitter under the leadership of our Witnesses today was a private
Company with federal government the federal government used to accomplish what it constitutionally cannot limit the free exercise of speech the government can’t do it a private business debatably can and government found that it could manipulate like a hand and a glove right a private business to do things that it
Does not have the legal right to be doing in this case taking away your right of free speech says some Democrats tried to Pivot the hearing away from its purpose by inviting surprise witnessed Anika navaroli a member of Twitter’s censorship team who was hailed as a hero
So censorship was was heroic they say right hailed as a hero after she helped the weaponization the weaponized Jan 6 committee Advance its anti-free speech agenda to testify about Twitter’s need for more censorship now keep in mind they withheld they withheld serious video evidence right they withheld serious video evidence of
What actually took place on January 6. the Jan 6 committee being led by the Democrats was even altering video evidence including removing audio that was necessary to understand the context of what you’re watching for example individuals who were accused of assaulting police uh while you know
Falling on top of them who could be heard on audio saying oh I’m sorry let’s get up together where they’re suggesting they’re trying to help the police officer up and saying it was an accident they had to remove that audio to remove the context where the people looked like
Good Guys in order to frame them as bad guys that type of stuff right altered evidence manipulated video withheld video evidence and they’re being hailed as Heroes for doing it I watch my documentary the real story of January 6 to learn what really happened on January 6 and stay tuned for part two
Well in the works right now which Joe hanneman’s more involved with that than I am this time uh Joe Joe was the guy did the last documentary with by the way and there’s more here folks and then I’ll show you some videos this is Daily Caller yes or no
Nancy mace and I’ll show you the video where she talks about this Nancy mace presses X Twitter sensor on collusion with government this is Republican South Carolina representative Nancy mace who pressed former Twitter Chief legal officer Vijaya Gotti over the company’s censorship policies during the house oversight committee’s Wednesday hearing
On Twitter’s role in suppressing the hunter Biden laptop story mace cornered Gotti honor Communications with government officials forcing her to affirm whether or not she had been in touch and she said did the US government ever contact you or anyone at Twitter to moderate certain tweets yes or no
And let me show you this as well video for she was also actually asking them about why they were censoring actual medical doctors when none of them were actually qualified to be doing that let me show you a video for talking um I have another tweet by someone with
A following of a full 18 000 followers this person put a chart from the CDC on Twitter it’s the cdc’s own data so it’s accurate by your standards and you all labeled this as misleading you’re not a doctor right Miss Gatti no I’m not okay what makes you think you
Or anyone else of Twitter have the medical expertise to censor actual accurate CDC data I’m not familiar with these particular situations yeah I’m sure you’re not but this is what Twitter did they labeled this as inaccurate it is the government’s own data it’s ridiculous that we’re even having to have this
Conversation today it’s not just about the laptop this is about medical advice that expert doctors we’re trying to give Americans because social media companies like Twitter were silencing their voices I have another question my last one for you miss uh Miss Gaddy did the U.S government ever contact you or anyone at
Twitter to pressure Twitter to moderate or censor certain tweets yes or no we have a program did the U.S government ever contact you or anyone at Twitter to censor or moderate certain tweets yes or no we receive legal demands to remove content from the platform from the U.S government and the governments all
Around the world those are published on a third party website and anyone can thank God for Matt taibi thank God for Elon Musk for allowing to show us in the world that Twitter was basically a subsidiary of the FBI censoring real medical voices with real expertise that put Real Americans lives in danger
Because they didn’t have that information now keep in mind this is just the first hearing this is just one of many to come we’re going to be hearing a lot more like this let me show you some of the other stuff that came out Matt Gates was calling out another individual for this
Revolving door in Washington um he notes the recent video from Project Veritas where project Veritas was talking to different individuals one of the individuals was a Pfizer scientist remember the guy who’s talking about directed Evolution stuff one of the things that individual talked about was the revolving door between business
Like the big Pharma and government where people go you know they leave government they go into big Pharma they leave big Pharma they go into government and how this ecosystem has created a type of special interest there’s a revolving door between senior officials at the doj and the lobbying profession
Do you think that that gives the public more or less trust There Are Rules governing what employment and this is based on my understanding I’ve been governed for 15 years governing what post-government employment can be one what individuals actions can be once they’re employed elsewhere but also what they’re allowed lobbying is influence
Peddling and you are the principal at the Raven Group which is a law being firm and I would observe the reporting of project Veritas where Jordan Tristan Walker who’s a director of research and development said on a recording one of the things we’re exploring is like why don’t we just manipulate covid ourselves
Mutate covid via directed Evolution Pfizer is a revolving door for all government officials it’s pretty good for industry to be honest it’s bad for everyone else in America Pfizer is one of the clients of the lobbying firm that you’re a principal of isn’t it I do not represent Pfizer I do not know
You’re a principal of the Raven group right no that is correct chairman Isaac unanimous consent to enter into the record the clients of the Raven Raven Group which include Pfizer that objection not just Pfizer but Google as well and in response to the Twitter files we saw a statement come from the
FBI where they said correspondence when the FBI and Twitter show nothing more than examples of our traditional long-standing and ongoing federal government and private sector engagements are there such engagements between the FBI and Google
