Met with heavy online criticism as you can imagine including with widespread condemnation of what they’re actually referring openly to as the New World Order now look the concept of a new world order used to be conspiracy it’s no longer just a conspiracy theory it is now being openly discussed they’re
Actually calling it this I’m not even joking let me show you a question was asked during the Davos meeting this is to Jake solivan US security advisor and his answer watch what are we able to keep on the positive POS side from the old order to bring into a new world
Order and how can we avoid that that New World Order uh becomes like jungle growing back and we rather uh have order based on international law and the principles that have brought us prosperity and freedom uh for decades the postc Cold War era has come to a
Close we’re at the start of something new we have the capacity to shape what that looks like and at the heart of it will be many of the core principles and core institutions of the existing order adapted uh for the challenges that we face today of course a big question is well
What is exactly the New World Order you know what is it actually referred to I think it may differ from person to person but remember a key agenda that’s pushed by the world economic form in fact by the founder the main guy himself CLA Schwab he’s pushing the idea of a so
Called great reset and this is not a conspiracy theory he literally wrote a book on it and the title is actually the great reset and it talks about how to use covid-19 as a way to Usher this in they talk about this idea the great reset as a replace and a replacement of
The global order that we live under the you know normal system that we’ve lived under for most of human history they want to replace that with what they call a multi-stakeholder model of government and what is the multi-stakeholder model well it’s essentially a call to break
Down the systems of the world you know of course the great reset you reset the world right and then when you build back better you do something different with it you know when you startle the systems back up and part of the starting backup what they want to implement is this
Multi-stakeholder model that includes subverting the authority of elected government you know in most most countries on Earth we live under various forms of democracy and even a republic is representative democracy we elect our leaders they want to change that by having it so that the control of countries is not just under elected
Government and what they want to do the multi-stakeholder model who are the stakeholders while they want to Grant shared government power to corporations investors NOS bankers and other unelected officials notably themselves so in other words what they’re calling for is essentially a global coupa they want to overthrow democracy they’re
Trying to replace it with a new form of international totalitarianism which they want to be in control of they’re trying to subvert and replace the authority of elected government with a system that ironically benefits the very people pushing for these things notably them and they’re using doomsday narratives like a
Doomsday cult trying to justify this they’re pushing narratives on global warming Global pandemics disease X similar issues like this and they’re using them as Trojan horses to justify the ushering in of a new vision of what they call the so-called New World Order and that’s what it refers to Case in
Point the agenda ironically against Farmers we hear so much about it they’re trying to get rid of farmers they’re coing cattle they’re making it so there’s restrictions on Nitro nitrogen so you can’t put fertilizer on your farm they want to limit all these things they’re closing farmers down now one of
The big things they have is of course justifying this Under The Narrative of fighting global warming and the just case in point there was a clip going viral from the world economic Forum just recently from their agenda contributor Hubert Keller explaining why coffee the coffee we drink most of us every morning
Is actually a problem for global warming watch on the nature side basically the coffee that we all drink um emits between 15 and 20 ton of CO2 per ton of coffee so we should all know that this is every time we drink coffee we are basically putting CO2 into the
Atmosphere um the other and one of the reason is because most of the coffee plantation of most of the coffee is produced through monoculture and and and mon culture is also affected by climate change well you heard it right drinking coffee is now a cause of climate change
But it’s actually Beyond this they say it’s not just drinking coffee it’s also the farming practices behind the growing of coffee beans and keep in mind this is not just empty talk they’re not just criticizing the normal way of life the people pushing these agendas are trying
To dismantle things that they claim are causing these problems and that includes even destroying Farms coing cattle restricting fertilizers and ironically setting a stage for an actual very real Global catastrophe so in their attempts to fight against the imaginary doomsday they’re creating one and then there are things like censorship and totalitarian
Government you know what is the New World Order what is the system we live under well keep in mind they’re not pushing for Freedom they’re calling for new systems to restrict freedom and they’re saying that freedom is ironically the threat they’re going against you know European commissioner pres commission president Ursula Vere
Lean is even saying that for these so-called Global business Community climate change is not the real problem they’re focused on she’s saying it’s something else for these individuals she claims the biggest problem in the world is what she calls disinformation and miss information watch dear Claus your annual Global risk
Report makes for a stunning and sobering read for the global business Community the top concern for the next two years is not conflict or climate it is disinformation and misinformation followed closely by polarization within our soci societies these risks are serious because they limit our ability to tackle
The big Global challenges we are facing changes in our climate and our geopolitical climate interesting so what they’re saying essentially is that because you know how they can alter how can they alter the way we live how can they usher in the New World Order if people like us
Are able to question debate and maybe even expose the things they’re doing they’re saying that the freedom you know Freedom of Information the ability of us to have open debates is a threat to their power and they’re saying this is the greatest challenge that we’re facing not climate change not a food crisis
It’s the ability of individuals to to question the Integrity maybe even the basic sanity of these people and remember the issue you know with narratives on misinformation and disinformation they’re not often targeted at actual misinformation or disinformation you know if New York Times comes out and says disinformation
Is a problem for the elections I personally don’t think they’re talking about actual disinformation if Joe Biden comes out and you know bangs his hands and says the Maga extremists are trying to rig the election with misinformation I’m probably going to assume he’s not talking about actual false information because of the way
We’ve seen these things been done when we talk about these narratives we often see that legitimate news is being censored and that people who question or expose the agendas they’re the ones being silenced ironically disinformation is a way to push false narratives while ironically trying to crush real news is
It the way we often see it and look remember as well this also isn’t just empty talk either here’s the European commissioner’s vice president for values and transparency on the actual efforts they’re trying to implement right now to Crush online free speech watch after Mr musk took over the Twitter with his
Freedom of speech absolutism um we are the Protectors of freedom of speech as well but at the same time we cannot accept the for instance the the illegal content online and so on so our message was clear we have the rules which has to which have to be complied
With and otherwise there will be sanctions now look if you listen to what she’s saying she’s pushing two different narratives she’s saying that they protect Free Speech they protect Free Speech but free speech has its limits because guess what they can’t allow illegal content so the question is what
Is the so-called illegal content well you know we can look at some examples of this if we remember you know she’s criticizing Elon Musk here she’s saying Elon Musk is the problem he’s allowing people to have free speech absolutism and that includes illegal content so what was it like before Elon
Musk took over TW took over Twitter if you remember what Twitter was like before Elon Musk there was child pornography on the website and the child pornography was not being stopped despite all the systems of censorship and the child pornography in interestingly was stopped almost immediately after Elon Musk brought the
Bought the company so what did Elon Musk do to stop actual illegal content child pornography one of the worst things I can think of from being on X or Twitter whereas the people before couldn’t and they didn’t have a problem with that look so the key is they’re not talking
About illegal things like we would normally think of them they’re not talking about stopping you know the abuse of children on these websites because musk did that he put an end to something they did not interestingly seem to have much of a problem with before all this and again they didn’t
Seem to have an issue with that right so what is the illegal content they’re actually referring to well look this is just a loaded term for so-called hate speech for allegations of racism and you know mostly it seems for people debunking exposing and notably criticizing the global agendas that
They’re trying to push the so-called misinformation and disinformation they’re more concerned about that it seems than child pornography because they didn’t have a problem with it before and they say they have rules that we have to be you know we have to follow rules that have to be complied with or
Else there will be sanctions but I question look tyrannical dictators have always hid their actions under the guise of law because if a tyrant takes power somewhere they control the arms of the law they can say the Nazis had rules they had laws there were rules you couldn’t break the Chinese Communist
Party has laws and rules you can’t break the Soviet Union had rules it doesn’t mean that the rules are good or just just because the Implement them you know case in point remember prison guards at concentration camps often said that they were just following orders it was the
Law and they were merely enforcing the law just because it’s a a rule or an order or a law does not mean that it’s something you should just follow does not mean that it’s just good or just and if they’re talking about trying to censor Americans using the rules of
European socialism well look these are things that do that go against ironically American law in fact I would say the European laws they trying to enforce onx and American company violate the constitutional laws of the United States and so how can we allow Europe to violate American law using this
Narrative well look again this ties into the globalist new world order as they’re calling it the global government and the working together of these International you know Elites as they even call themselves openly to try to have a one world system they’re trying to force on
All of us and they seem to believe that they can dictate the freedoms and restrictions of people everywhere in the world including right here in the United States forcing totalitarian laws in other countries I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again what does it mean if
Twitter or X has to fold to let’s say the censorship laws of Europe or maybe the censorship laws of the Chinese Communist Party further down the road maybe the censorship laws of North Korea do we allow the worst abusers of violations of free speech to go against the Constitutional protections we have
In the United States what happens if we allow the lowest common denominator of freedom to dictate the level of Freedom everywhere in the world if we let Europe censor Americans based on European totalitarian law which this is what does it mean then if other countries try to
Do the exact same thing using the exact same narratives and that’s the problem we’re facing of course with global governance and the New World Order and look maybe this ties into the problem of the threat of the so-called geopolitical climate freedom of speech is a threat to
The global political agenda that some of these individuals seem to be pushing because it seems the problem for them is not just freedom of speech interestingly the problem for many of them seems to be freedom in General Freedom overall in fact the Federalist had this it said the nation’s ruling class holds deeply
Authoritarian opinions widely divorced from the rest of the American electorate finds a survey out this week and it found that nearly 60% of American Elites remember the world economic Forum they call themselves openly the elites think there is too much individual freedom in America meanwhile it says nearly 60% of
Registered voters have the exact opposite opinion reporting the reporting the United States has too much top- down control limiting Liberty the study TI them versus US Define the American Elite as having a postgraduate degree a household income of more than $150,000 annually and living in a zip
Code with more than 10,000 people per square mile a city in other words such people account for about 1% of Americans and the study also examined the subsample of the 1% who graduated from IV League schools or other name brand institutions such as Northwestern Duke Stanford and the University of of
Chicago now let me show you the actual report again it’s title them versus us the two Americas and how the nation’s Elite is out of touch with the average Americans and it’s from the committee to unleash Prosperity here’s what it found it says this key findings in a time when
Most Americans have suffered a loss of real take-home pay 74% of Elites say they are financially better off today than in the past versus 20% of all Americans it says nearly six in 10 say there is too much individual freedom in America double the rate of all Americans it says more than 2/3
67% favor rationing of vital energy and food resources they want to give us food rations to combat to combat the threat of climate change it says that in stark contrast to the rest of America 70% of the elites trust the government to do the right thing most of the time says
2/3 against 67% say teachers and other educ professionals should decide what children are taught rather than letting their parents decide and it says somewhere between half and 2/3 favor Banning things like SUVs gas stoves air conditioning and non-essential air travel to protect the environment and I
Will remind you most of the people at Davos a lot of them seem to have private jets they want to get rid of us being able to have air travel unless it’s essential while we can assume that they deem themselves essential and everything they do is essential this is a
Two-tiered system of the global New World Order It also says about six of 10 Elites have a favorable opinion of the so-called talking professions lawyers lobbyists politicians and oh the worst journalists it says President Joe Biden enjoys an 84% job approval rating from this group roughly twice as high as the
General public are you getting that folks now when they say that they’re out of touch with the average person I would have to agree but all this being said some of the globalist agendas are too extreme even for many of the folks who used to you know we used to see as
Extreme take Dei for example diversity equity and inclusion and in particular the concept of equity the agenda of equity over equality right equality of outcome versus equality of opportunity Equity is you know you have equal outcome no matter what you do this is too extreme even for Bernie
Sanders who is for a long time the main socialist politician in the United States watch what he has to say a lot of people hear equity and they hear equality that it’s the same word and it’s not the same word and the same concept so how would you differentiate between equity and
Equality well equality we talk about uh I don’t know the answer to that is come me to think of it you know uh equality is equality of opportunity all right we live in a society we want all people right to have whatever color your skin is equity I think is more guarantee of
Outcome is it not I think so I think that’s okay so which do you come which side do you come down on uh equality equality yeah okay now look regardless of any of this even at the world economic Forum this year there were actually some pretty big criticisms notably using the stage of
The world economic Forum to criticize the world economic Forum one of them who criticized it was the new president of Argentina that’s Javier Malay and he went viral for some of his statements let me show you what he had to say today I’m here to tell you that the Western world is in
Danger and it is endangered because those who are supposed to have to defend the values of the West are coopted by a vision of the world that inexorably leads to socialism and thereby to Poverty unfortunately in recent decades motivated by some well-meaning individuals willing to help others and
Others motivated by the wish to belong to a privileged cast the main leaders of the western world have abandoned the model of Freedom four different versions of what we call collectivism we’re here to tell you that collectivist experiments are never the solution to the problems that afflict the citizens
Of the world rather they are the root cause do believe me no one better place than us argentines to testify to these two points when we adopted the model of Freedom back in 1860 in 35 years we became a leading world power and when we Embrace collectivism over the course of
The last 100 years we saw how our citizens started to become systematically impoverished and we dropped to spot number 140 globally now look Malay is hitting on some of the key principles of classic Austrian economics and what he’s referring to I believe is interventionist policies meant to you
Know often make problems worse and of of course socialist interventionism what does this actually mean what is interventionism it’s the idea of trying to micromanage everything with a purely top- down system the government for example subsidizes a certain good the government for example tries to control or subsidize a certain industry they try
To mandate the creation of a certain product they subsidize things to intervene in the marketplace and what happens when they do that as soon as they intervene as soon as they create a product that cannot fail as soon as they create a business that cannot go out of
Business as soon as they try to dictate what people can or can’t buy it causes disruptions in the marketplace that interestingly oftentimes have the opposite effect when you have socialist interventionism for example let’s say Joseph Stalin takes the podium and says I demand the creation of uh you know
Iron pots all around the country you know in China they had something like this and what happened you know Vladimir Lenin under the Soviet Union also seized a lot of farming implements iron and so on what happened in China but you know of course maidong came out and said we
Need to you know create new we we have to do like a farmers Revol resol uh Revolution we have to seize all the iron in all of China and what happened you had Farmers taking their farming implements their hose and everything else like that the things they need to
Grow you know grow their crops giving them away melting them down you had people giving their household pots and pans that they used to cook their meals to the government the government of course took all these things and melted all it melted it all down into pig iron
And it was almost completely useless the end product because the quality of the iron was so bad because of how they did this meanwhile they started having massive crop failures and mass starvation because they took everybody’s farming implements it’s a perfect example of socialist interventionism in mainland China under
The Chinese Communist party they launched a campaign of what they called Sparrow Warfare because they declared that you know the CCP came out and said if we can only get rid of The Sparrows that eat the crops we will of course have more crops because they were
Arguing you know you grow all these crops in these evil capitalist birds come and eat the food that the people grow so what happened they started the sparrow War where people were encouraged to kill those little birds and what happened they killed all the birds and then insects ravaged their crops and
People starved to death same thing in a lot of other areas by the way the idea of socialist interventionism is the idea of course you know under socialism government seizes the means of production government creates an absolute form of power from the top down and they believe
They can micro manage the you know policies and everything else of every single business and every single individual across the entire country the new agenda is the entire world and of course when they make these sweeping policies they’re often times disconnected from the unique realities on the ground that exist and often
Differ from one place to the next they tend to create more problems than they solve because they don’t take into account Nu on or other factors that people may bring up if they try to criticize hey that may not be a good idea because the birds eat the bugs and
The bugs eat the crops many problems we Face are being caused by the very people who claim they want to solve them in fact this was one of the big discussions at the world economic Forum this year they brought in Kev Kevin Roberts of the Heritage Foundation is kind of the
Ordinary person he was the spokesperson for the average man because remember we’re talking about these you know these polls they’ve done on the elites and 67% and 60% roughly believe that the average person has too much freedom and they’re smarter than everybody else and they just need to restrict our ability to
Drive SUVs and fly in airplanes and so on like that only they should be able to do it so the question was well who are these average people who we are so disconnected from well they brought in Kevin Roberts to explain to them what normal people think think and especially
What they think about the possible return of Donald Trump and what it means to them let me show you what Kevin Roberts had to say at the world economic Forum it’s laughable that you would or anyone would describe Davos as protecting liberal democracy it’s equ standing up for it it’s it’s it’s
Equally laughable to use the word dictatorship at Davos and and aim that at president Trump in fact I think that’s absurd but I’m going to step aside from that constructive criticism and instead answer your question yep and and I’m going to be substantive here president Trump if he’s the next
President for that matter I think whoever the next conservative president is going to take on the power of the elites which I mentioned earlier but there the thing that I want to drive home here the very reason that I’m here at Davos is to explain to many people in
This room and who are watching with all due respect nothing personal but that’s your part of the problem now look it’s actually interesting because one of the big narratives that was pushed by everybody from CLA Schwab to you know a lot of the speakers was this concept and this
Concern they’re expressing that people no longer seem to respect them there’s a disconnect between the global Elites and the average person they see Trump as representing this phenomenon Trump they would say represents a populist movement a representative of the Common Man the average person the normal Citizen and
For some reason they’re saying the average citizen no longer seems to believe the authorities they don’t trust the the science they don’t believe these so-called experts they believe that government policies are out to harm them in many cases rather than help them and they believe honestly that uh frankly a
Lot of these policies have had the opposite effect of what they claim to do and one of the big topics you heard across the board at the world economic forum is how to deal with this interestingly the big solution was censor them the big solution was we need
To get rid of the things that constitute the basic way of life and you know why don’t they trust us when all we’re trying to do is strip away their freedoms get rid of their air conditioners take away their coffee get rid of their meat change their ways of
Life make it so they have no privacy censor them and see what else we can do to them maybe in the future why don’t they believe us why don’t they trust us gee I don’t know and of course all of this being said there is now proposed legislation right here in the United
States to stop giving taxpayer money to the world econom IC forum and yes I was shocked to learn this apparently by the way we’ve actually been giving money to the world economic Forum our tax dollars the bill to stop this and again we’ll see if it ever gets passed it was
Introduced by representative Scott Perry from it’s all Republicans along with others including Tom Tiffany and representative Paul goar let me show you the bill it’s called to prohibit funding for the world economic forum and it said be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of
America and Congress assembled it says this act may be cited as the defund Davos act and it says no funds available to the Department of State the United States agency for International Development or any other department or agency may be used to provide funding for the world economic Forum in other
Words despite all the attempts to intervene the basic perceptions of the average man to make it so that we all trust them yet again by trying to censor us and rolling out preparations for disease X which I’ll talk about tomorrow because we need a whole episode just to
Talk about that yes they’re talking about disease X and how to save us from ourselves all of our dangerous opinions and the dangerous decisions we make like eating meat and drinking coffee and using air conditioners now as all this happens of course again we’ll see where
It goes but this is dividing the world into two main camps of course the elites and the common individual the populist movement that is now rising up all around the world not just here in the United States and the global shift now taking place interestingly as the so-called Elites try to implement the
New World Order all right folks that said let’s jump into some questions let’s see here bizarre times we’re living in right um all right at Le at least they’re like doing it in in person at Le at least they’re doing it publicly and they’re not meeting in like creepy Groves with
Owl statues and stuff like that right am I right all right Jackie hail you’re saying well starbu cancel itself uh Jackie I think you have a great social movement that could be implemented the encouragement of Starbucks to cancel itself to save itself and all of us from
Global warming uh we should all remind them that coffee is in fact a contributor to global warming and that we need to offset this by having them close all their stores actually I I I have something interesting I wanted to talk to all you about I had an interesting conversation
Recently I had uh you know just um random you know I meet a lot of individuals on the road while traveling around one of the individuals I talk to actually works in the industry of these um you know they call them climate credits where of course businesses they
Have to try to get climate credits case in point do you remember the story where we were saying that it was the headlines read something like Bill Gates wants to cut down all the trees and then bury them do you remember that now the reality of that story was this there was
A company that Bill Gates had invested in and it was being framed as a you know a company that was trying to get carbon credits and the policy was they wanted to cut down forests or trees and then bury the wood and the concept was right
The argument they had was that were a forest fire to take place every single tree if it were to catch on fire and burn would emit x amount of carbon right because if you burn a tree it creates carbon emissions and so to prevent the hypothetical carbon emissions were a
Forest fire to take place the proposed solution would be to cut down these trees and bury them under the Earth so that in the future they could not catch on fire and create carbon or you know contribute to global warming the reality of this is that it’s
A scam at least in my opinion to collect carbon credits and there’s actually a huge business on carbon credits the way this agenda works is they start up all these different companies that create you know Green inititive one of the big things the world economic Forum you know
Supports are these green initiatives and what are these it’s it’s part of at least in my opinion a giant scam it’s a giant con job of creating businesses that pretend they’re having a positive Global footprint or reducing carbon emissions like cutting down trees that might hypothetically catch on fire and
Burn and create carbon emissions so they bury them things like that so what do they do they calculate the amount of car carbon that they have offset right the X amount of carbon that has been prevented from going into the atmosphere by burying the trees for example and then
They sell those credits to companies that’s how the scam works and so let’s say that you know they have this program of cutting down the trees and burying them to prevent this the calculated amount of carbon that has been prevented from going into the atmosphere because they’re saying you know hypothetically
If they caught fire would it would have created x amount of you carbon emissions right they take that amount and they sell it to companies and so companies have to buy these carbon credits meaning they have to subsidize these fake ridiculous companies that actually do nothing good for the world and nothing
Good for the environment that just create these fake carbon credits and then sell them to businesses and there are people getting stinking absolutely rich off of this scam but because they mandate that companies have to have these carbon credits it has created this alternate economy and people are
Creating these ridiculous con jobs this snake oil salesman type stuff in order to game this system that they have created and you have of course different countries like China and so on that just fake a lot of it in fact they found when they investigated some of these carbon
Credit you know Mills it’s often times nothing it’s they’re not doing anything of benefit or it’s just fake and it’s entirety but the carbon credits actually don’t matter and so when they talk about Net Zero what they mean is buying up the amount of carbon credits that would
Equal the amount of carbon that the company itself would emit which is why you have like oil companies that are being deemed as green for example that are trying to achieve Net Zero not because they’re stopping the emission of carbon emissions if you even believe The Narrative of course but because they’re
Buying up carbon credits in order to offset their carbon emissions which means they’re financing this massive scam this huge scam that’s being run uh which you know is part of the the global narrative and these individuals are getting stinking Rich by doing this what I would say just a giant snake oil
Salesman uh con job on the entire world anyways wild stuff right um and by the way I was told that even the guys who sell these carbon credits cuz I was talking to one of them uh they they don’t believe in it a lot of them are like Republican Trump
Supporters and stuff but they they’re opportunist it’s just a way to make money for them all right before we go into more questions uh don’t forget we have a new documentary the real story of January 6 part two and you can watch that only on Epic TV in fact you we’re
Watching on YouTube right now they’ll probably kick me off if I show it to you so jump over to Epic TV if you want to see that I’ll show you the trailer for that actually and then we’ll go into some more questions calling the January 6th investigation the biggest investigation in FBI
History there are more than 1100 arrests and they show no signs of of slowing down when you take an oath you have to abide by it they’re just going to identify you on video arrest you and then figure out what the evidence is after that those involved must be held
Accountable he’s an innocent man and he has been punished for something that he never did every day you wake up and you’re like how did I get out of bed today you have to stay away from the word Patriot now because that’s a terrorist organization we interviewed two whistleblowers from the
FBI I sacrificed my dream job to share this information with the American people that Siege was criminal Behavior plain and simple and behavior that we the FBI view as domestic terrorist we started with death threats uh the hate mail I don’t care what they
Do to me but I do care what they do to my family our family struggles every day it’s going to change narratives no matter what your political perspective is all right welcome back again that documentary is only on Epic TV I cannot show you it on YouTube they will
Probably ban me for it but back into some questions and real quick too you know if you want to watch it head over we have a few we have a lot of other great documentaries a lot of my investigative work is there epic tv.com EPO tv.com come all right see here Linda
2010 you’re saying so now even coffee will be limited to the elites well we’ll see what they try to do you know the the the reality is when it comes to the the agenda on the food front they’re trying to I interestingly restrict farming overall they’re making policies where they’re trying to force
Farmers to co their cattle you have actually I mean some major stuff happening in Europe right now now Ireland for example they tried to force Farmers to co like 200,000 cattle or something insane like that they’ve started up or maybe more than that they started up a new farmer political party
Pushing back against it in Germany you have massive farmer protests pushing back against this in the Netherlands for example where they tried to implement these new you know socialist I would call them socialist policies of trying to restrict nitrates which is eliminating the ability of farmers to
Use use you know certain amounts of fertilizer and even trying to regulate cattle because they say that cattle because they fart and you know defecate and everything like else uh that that is representing carbon emissions so they have to kill the cows in order to save the environment because they’re pushing
These things you have a lot of push back interestingly from Farmers and people who are losing their land and people who are raising alarm saying look if they keep doing this they’re going to cause a global famine they’re going to cause Mass starvation they’re going to kill us
If they keep doing this and you know it’s interesting that you have you know the United Nations warning about the threat of global starvation and meanwhile you have these nutcases at Davos trying to restrict farming what is the logic in that you know how how can
You have that logic where on one side you can say there’s a risk of global starvation people are going to die of starvation because there’s not enough food and on the other side you can say we need to restrict farming and kill the cows and get rid of farmland and build
Who knows what in order to protect the climate to save us from dying but they’re going to kill us by doing that like what what is the logic in this and frankly I’d say this is one of the reasons why rational normal people think these people are nuts nuts at the very
Least and evil at the very most I’d say you know maybe combination of the two in fact and yeah coffee is just one of the examples they’re giving talking about the you know The Narrative of coffee is is what they’re using as an example of the problems with farming in general uh
Miss Terry you’re saying is coffee such a problem what part of CO2 do they miss about buying all our goods from China yeah like international shipping right which they they subsidize by the way uh got to stop buying made in China if we follow that logic actually because they
Subsidize shipments from China speaking of state interventionism it would not be doable it would not be affordable to have mass trade like we do coming from China were it not for these subsidies and so you know if you want to ship something from China to the US or you
Know elsewhere um a lot of the costs of that shipping are offset through these you know interventionist policies and it makes it so it’s very hard for companies here to compete with things being sold ironically from the other side of the world actually now I was in Taiwan just
Recently I was looking at my window of the airplane normal airplane flying coach uh looking out the window and I I remember looking and seeing all these lights you know because it was night time and I was like man what are those I thought we were flying over land for a
Minute it was shipping container ships tons of them because you know when you’re flying to Taiwan from you know the US you do travel over you know the Southeastern tip of China you actually do fly over the coastline there were just tons more shipping container ships
Than I’ve ever seen and so the CCP has been able to become one of the largest exporters ironically because of state interventionism and what would normally be an unaffordable and unsustainable practice you want talk about actual sustainability is being made artificially sustainable and affordable only because of the interventionist
Policies these subsidies where you know we shoulder the cost of international shipping and offset that for the CCP so they can get stinking rich on it James Dyson you’re saying here’s my solution for carbon emissions made in the USA yeah I fully agree James um in fact I I
You know I I don’t think a country can go without producing anything for a long time before you lose your in your ability to innovate um I think I think that having an unproductive Society where frankly you know all the jobs are just middle middle management jobs you’re going to have
People not wanting to do it uh you’re going to have people playing roles that that feel empty people work but they create nothing uh you’re not going to be able to sustain a country like that especially as over time the manufacturing the experience the people who are on the ground and Building
Things and the ability to innovate based on how they understand things work is being done in other countries where we’re offshoring it it’s not going to be sustainable you want to talk about again real sustainability that that’s not going to work out well for us within maybe just a
Couple Generations we’re going to destroy ourselves if we keep doing that I think truth be known you’re saying I think the wef world economic Forum has too much freedom of speech yeah well you know if you want to like push for agendas to manuf facture Global starvation I would say that you’ve
Overstepped the boundaries of of you know friendly government and acceptable speech if you’re talking about policies to manufacture like Global genocide because you’re going to starve people to death by eliminating the food on their plate I’d say you’re pretty dang evil and I’d say that’s a whole lot worse
Than you know maybe Trump’s Mean Tweets which is one of the big problems they have or people questioning the the mental stability of the people pushing these agendas you know I I I think we’re putting our priorities in the wrong place here personally you know uh Gila andh you’re
Saying what gave them that power where are all the government leaders well interestingly the world economic Forum includes most government leaders the issue with World economic forum is that it’s it’s kind of like um it’s it’s it’s subversive to to put it plainly in my opinion it is a subversive movement
Because they bring in all of the government leaders all the elites you know quote unquote and then they try to make the governments share the power of governing societies with unelected leaders Business Leaders NOS investors Elites tied in with their little club network uh people like CLA Schwab and
The people around him people who have no power and no Authority technically but who are trying to change the system of government you know the the great reset and the multi-stakeholder capitalism model they want in order to give themselves power that is not been granted to them through elections or by
The people they’re trying to gain control over this in a very real sense I think is a coua this is a revolution they’re trying to subvert the systems of government of the world and alter the systems of government we have in order to give them and their crony body’s
Power over us and you know I find that I find that uh pretty problematic I I think that they should be regarded as a revolutionary movement they should be regarded as people trying to launch an Insurrection to seize and alter the forms of government of the United States
And other countries in the world they should be seen as no different than you know the insurrectionists they claim tried to overthrow democracy because ironically I would say these people are in fact trying to overthrow democracy they’re trying to eliminate the system of elected governance by creating a system interestingly of unelected
Governance which gives power to them and their buddies uh Gina mik you’re saying no meat no coffee no cars no pets no children no food no faith no privacy no Freedom this is what these demons are trying to usher in actually Gina I think
You hit it you hit the nail on the head maybe they should just make that the slogan to eliminate confus Fusion World economic Forum colon no meat no coffee no cars no pets no children no food no faith no privacy no Freedom it would simplify their message I think because
Everything you’re saying here does represent what many people at those conferences are pushing for Ashley from cforia you’re saying are we becoming idiocracy yeah it’s a reference to a movie by the way there was a movie called ID ocracy and um the trailer went viral for it essentially it’s a I think
I it’s like I call it a black comedy I think the the concept of Idiocracy is where the smart people stop reproducing right they’re saying oh you know I need to get through college before I think about having kids uh we should use birth control because I don’t want to you know
Uh damage my career and they you know the smart educated people just stop having children but the people who start having kids are the people who don’t think like that they’re not thinking about consequences or long-term life goals or anything like that and so it creates this kind of you
Know reverse uh this this kind of reverse policy of trying to micromanage genetics and what they do is they breed all of the idiots right all the idiots are the people who have kids and it creates the idiocracy where the intelligence have has been overtime bred
Out of society it’s a funny concept a funny movie Personally I’d say that ironically The Spar people tend to be the ones who probably don’t go to Ivy League colleges and so on these days you know I I think it’s flipped these days the people who can think for themselves
But but still a funny concept right Judi Yim you say and actually funny note i’ I’ve been told this by a few people you know I was told by Alando Santos he’s a he’s a Brazilian journalist who was hated by by the leftist government there in fact he’s on
The run from them he was saying that he was talking to Alo de Cavo before Alo de cavayo died great you know Brazilian philosopher and journalist as well and Alo made the point he was like you know the the Communists in the time of Carl Marx and all these guys you know they
Were like poets and writers they were like the intellectuals they were the they were the intellectual Elite of their countries and they were you know trying to push for all these complicated narratives and you know even though in my opinion they were evil they were absolutely evil a lot of them were very
Smart the difference with Communists these days is they are absolute morons they’re the stupidest people alive and I would say you can look at frankly a lot of the stuff they do you know they’re not they’re not uh they’re not they’re not they’re not playing with a full deck
Of cards if you know what I mean like you know you’re not going to have most Communists these days who even read half the books they talk about you know like they’re not well educated they’re not intelligent individuals and ironically you know the way this was told to me is
Because the Communists subverted the education system and if you subvert the education system and you make it so you’re just training good Factory workers which notably you know we’re in America with in most of the Free World we’re practicing the Prussian system of Education public education is based on
The Prussian model which is not made to make you smart it is made to make you a good factory worker the Prussian model of the public education system is meant to teach you to be a a worker drone basically and that was of course subverted by the owenites a communist
Group and so on and there was an intentional dumbing down of people they wanted to manufacture illiteracy they have the new agendas under you know Obama’s forced uh you know government curriculum where they they redid math where they have just math that doesn’t even make logical sense it’s because
They’re trying to make you stupid and because they’re TR by the way great at Great series on this by Alex Newman that you can read in The Epic Times and I think he’s reworking that series into a book right now Alex Newman a e x NE E W
M Ann and if you want to read his stories on The Epic Times he he has a fantastic series on this but you know this intentional dumbing down of her education system to create just people who follow orders based basically people who are incapable of independent thought and especially incapable of poetic or
Benedictine thought where they can think beyond the boundaries of established knowledge you eliminate those people the issue that the Communists and socialists have had though is that the people who’ve risen up to become the new leaders of the communist movement are also products of the idiocracy of the
Dumbing down of the education system you know the morons they’re idiots and you know the more they go into this system of you know idiot idiot uh you know education the Dumber they get and so you have people who are just utterly incapable of independent thinking they
They and they don’t understand it and that’s the problem interestingly I’d say you can actually understand some of the debates we had with like covid-19 and lockdowns and why won’t you trust the science why don’t you trust the experts it’s because people think for themselves and the ironically the people who have
Tried forcing these policies on us they don’t think like that I would say they’re not capable of independent thought they’ve deferred their logic to external experts and even if what the external experts are saying does not make logical sense they still follow it because they’ve deferred that type of
You know basic discernment to an external Source when they question why is it that we know we we’ve lost control over the information systems why is it that people don’t believe us anymore it’s because ironically the average person is smart than they give credit to and even
If people don’t have like official you know Advanced degrees and stuff like that uh it doesn’t mean the person cannot discern information I’d say ironically a lot of the people who’ve avoided doing that are more capable of independent thought than the ones who have and you know interestingly I’d say
Again that’s part of the cultural shift we’ve had take place in this country and a lot of the world that the global Elites just plain old don’t understand you know why won’t people listen to us it’s because have independent thought and they’re through their own discernment they they don’t think you’re
Credible anymore frankly you know why is it that YouTubers have more of an audience these days than the major news networks it’s because people have you know they have their own discernment and they can say I discern that what this guy is telling me is fake they just they
Just don’t believe it like they used to you know uh Judy Yim you’re saying which one of the elites would stop drinking their coffee I wonder they imagine the plebes are going back to feudalistic St standards of Rights and them as kings and queens still enjoying their privileges they just want Global slavery
Judy I think you’re 100% accurate and I’d say that’s also what socialism always has been you a lot of people frame socialism as a system to create power it’s people pushing it the people often times trying to advocate for Communist Revolution and socialism they often times don’t plan to live as
The average person under that system usually when they’re pushing it they imagine themselves as the leaders when they talk about seizing the means of production and you know equal equality under the one system of government they don’t mean that they’re going to be equal to you they don’t mean that
They’re going to live as poor as you do they imagine themselves as living like kings and queens as you mentioned you know and you always see this and they imagine everybody else living in you know your pod eating your bugs and everything else they see themselves eating their steak and lobster which
They do at these meetings while the rest of us are eating our Cricut Burgers that’s how they see it you know when when when they talk about eliminating you know non-essential air travel look these these many of these people have private yachts in private jets they’re not talking about themselves so yeah
Case in point uh Richard Flanigan you’re saying who decides what is disinformation misinformation yeah Richard that’s one of the big flaws in the uh in the agenda they’re trying to push we need to get rid of false information okay but who says what’s true and what’s false uh we need to get
Rid of all information that is not verified well who verifies it you know if if you talk about for example the history of even you know scientific development there were people in the past who were not able to present scientific findings because it was deemed fake before it even began because
You weren’t allowed to debate it you know historically we look at that as being a darker time in world history where we we couldn’t have open discussions around observable reality you know what I mean and the problem you had was that when if when when a group of individuals becomes the gate become
The Gatekeepers of what is true and what is false and what can be discussed and what cannot be discussed maybe it works for a little bit maybe maybe you have a few enlightened Elites who just have the absolute ability to discern truth from falsehoods and you know just see through
All Illusions I don’t I don’t know if anybody’s capable of that but maybe that’s how they imagine themselves but often times that doesn’t happen often times what you have happen is that you have people who just choose to not believe in some things or try to crush things that go against their personal
Interest even if it is true uh you can look for example at many of the false narratives that have been pushed ironically by the people on the other side the whole narrative it’s safe and effective 100% safe and effective that’s false uh the lab leak origin of the virus is
Pure disinformation and should be crushed it is racist if you say it came from China well that’s false now they’re even admitting it uh you know Trump colluded with Russia to rig the 2016 election turns out they lied about that it was actually disinformation funded ironically by the DNC in the Clinton
Campaign uh you know the list goes on and on and on many of the things they tell you are false false turn out to be true and many of the things they tell you are true turn out to be false but they becoming you know because they try to make
Themselves The Gatekeepers of Truth and falsehood use the use ironically that power to crush the people who they see as threats to their own fake narratives you know the way that Free Speech was aing fathers because you if you want to talk about how do we arrive at truth
Right how do we arrive at truth I would say that most religions have talked a lot about you know the religious nature of Truth you know that uh you know I from Christianity to dosm to I’d say most I’d say upright religions they talk about the pursuit of truth and how do
You arrive at that well a lot of times it’s through of course open discussion you can talk about the Socratic method where you know through dialogue and asking questions we can arrive at truth you can talk about the ability of individuals from different perspectives to find common ground with each other
The way the founding fathers imagined is is the way of for example getting rid of fake and you know fake rumors and so on was not through censorship and not through restricting the ability of people to even criticize the government in fact even sedici speech was allowed
Under you know the founding fathers uh which was of course the debate around the Alien and Sedition Act by the way and you know the way they imagined it was the marketplace of ideas just like in a free market where if something works it succeeds and if something fails
It doesn’t work it goes out of business the same thing with ideas that if you have the marketplace of ideas in other words the market economy applied to truth and falsehood that naturally through debate lies will be exposed and what is true will be recognized that is
The marketplace of ideas and that is the nature of free speech and the way that we arrive at truth through Free Speech yes there are going to be people making stupid and false statements but you should be able to criticize them you should be able to question them and
Through that process of public discernment and public criticism yes you can expose what is false and you can arrive at truth in fact I’d say that you know my news show attempts to do that and I think a lot of independent news shows attempt to do that and we’re a
Thorn in the side ironically the people trying to do the opposite I’d say because hey you know well welcome to the marketplace of ideas folks where we can have open discussions uh Richard Flanigan yeah sorry I read that already all right folks that’s say this’s end it for today
Uh join me join me tomorrow we’ll be talking about disease X which is what the world economic forum and the World Health Organization are now talking about and they’re saying they had their they had their disease X Games where they were modeling the future response of the future unknown pandemic and the
World Health Organization is now saying that we need preparations and possible restrictions to prepare for a disease that has not yet come to exist and they’re talking about unfreezing ice to release Frozen ancient pathogens and the Chinese Communist party has created new a new virus that has a 100% death rate
Uh at least in mice so disease X join me tomorrow 10:30 a.m. eastern time for that those of you on YouTube Tuesdays and Thursdays I’ll do the whole episode but uh Monday Wednesday and Friday I’ll do most of the episode and the Q&A on Epic TV but still join us for maybe the
First you know 15 20 minutes um and again that’s partly because well first of all YouTube censors me but second of all because there’s a lot of stuff I can’t talk about on YouTube even if YouTube Un censors me I’m planning to keep this model because I need to be
Able to talk about things that they don’t want me talking about and what I will do is of of course take the topics that they censor and put them on the days where I know I’m going to on Epic TV and not on YouTube so join us on Epic
TV for that Marketplace of ideas the uncensored discussions we can have to find truth together all right folks that said thank you all so much for being here please take care of yourselves and as always please again please take care of yourselves stay informed and stay free thank [Applause] you
