so the issue of concealed carry bands is once again back in the hands of the Supreme Court and we have a significant development which indicates what the Supreme Court is going to do new when it comes to concealed carry bands in States like New York who are defying the Bruin decision so let’s talk about what just happened now really quick before we jump this video I want to thank one of the main supporters of this channel which is first form first form is an amazing company I love their supplements I’ve been using them to get healthier but one of the really cool things about first form is they are pro Second Amendment they are pro freedom and they believe in what we do here on the channel they support the freedom cause again they’re Pro Amer so if you want to get amazing supplements I love their supplements check out their protein powder but also if you just want to support a company that’s Pro Freedom check them out using the links down below and thank you again to first form for sponsoring and supporting this content as I mentioned in the intro in this video we’re going to be discussing how the issue of concealed carry and various bans in the Defiance of the second amendment in the Supreme Court’s recent Bruin decision is now back in the hands of the Supreme Court you may recall recently that five cases had been expedited and had hearings before the second Circuit Court of Appeals because of recent warnings that Supreme Court issued when it came to the second circuit’s Defiance of Bruin those five cases challenged New York’s new ConEd car Improvement act also known as the ccia that New York law created a hyper restrictive consed carry law that was a direct response to what the the Supreme Court said in bruan the state of New York passed that law just 8 days after the Supreme Court issued that 6 to3 Landmark decision New York and the second circuit continue to defy that Express decision and now guns of America has asked for the Supreme Court to re-review their anonio case and once again strike down the New York State Defiance and strike down these concealed carry bands and one of the very interesting things with this is this case antonuk was set for conference it technically kind of went to conference but then out of that order we got a not a relist we didn’t get an order list saying that it was granted or denied and then we also did not get a relist of the antino case instead the antono case has been put on hold which signals something very specific that is about to happen in this case what is likely now happening is that the Antonio case has been put on hold because the Supreme Court is set to decide the rahimi case we also recently got the cargo bump stock decision which was authored by Thomas and that likely signals now that El is going to be writing the rahimi decision which is very good for us I think Alo is going to write an amazing opinion and what’s probably going to happen now is the rahimi decision is going to of course have the application of Bruin when it comes to the domestic violence restraining orders restrictions that is challenge directly in rahimi but with the anono case now being put on hold that means it is likely on hold for that decision in rahimi which means rahime is going to directly impact this concealed carry dispute the application of bruan and probably a lot of other 2A cases as well so with this case being on hold the antono case being on hold that also means that once rahimi is issued we are likely going to see a grant vacate and remand of the antino case now if you’re not familiar with what is going on in bruan the Supreme Court struck down New York’s original May issue CCW licensing scheme finding that it was inconsistent with this nation’s history and tradition and one of the primary findings of bruan was that the government Bears a burden to prove that their restrictions or their regul are based in the history and tradition of our nation and those types of restrictions have to date back to 1791 now despite the Supreme Court issuing that 63 decision in bruan just 8 days after that decision the state of New York passed the conil carry Improvement act also known as the ccia and what the ccia did is it created a scheme that was even worse than the one that existed prior to bruan this New York law of the ccia which again was passed in direct response to bruan was then challenged by multiple organizations in federal district courts one of those being the antino case which was filed by The Gun Owners of America now in the antino case the case originally sought emergency review from the Supreme Court because of what happened down below originally down below the district court uh ruled in our favor granted a preliminary injunction but then it went to the second circuit who then granted some blanket stays on that decision um just pretty much stopped what the lower court did as far as the plary injunction originally on the first attempt the antio case went for an emergency review from the Supreme Court but the Supreme Court denied it but one of the good things out of that denial is we did get some language from Justice Alo saying that although they were not going to step in on an emergency basis at that time what they were saying is that the second circuit had to correct this issue either they would have to issue an opinion with a rationale of why they granted that blanket stay or they would need to expedite the hearings in these cases and the second circuit decided to just simply expedite those hearings now recently the second circuit held hearings and issued their ruling on all five of those ccia cases again the big one was the ano case because the antino case challenged the ccia uh restrictions at large the Sensi of location Provisions the permit process and all of that now the second circuit ultimately vacated what the lawyer Court said so they vacated the preliminary injunction that was granted by the lower court now in that decision the second circuit tried to distinguish Bruin as an exceptional case and as an exceptional case the second circuit said that they could vacate the lower court said here in the antonuk case because bruan and antonuk are not one and the same they said that bruan was an exceptional case dealing with an exceptional issue and they believed anono and the ccia law which was again passed in direct response to Bruin was not exceptional now in response to that second circuit ruling Goa has now filed for a petition for Supreme Court review although this case is still at an interlocutory posture the fact that this deals directly with bruan with that decision and new New York’s response to bruan strongly you know makes this a strong candidate for Supreme Court review also the fact that the Supreme Court has prior stated in this very case that there is a potential for reconsideration if the second circuit did not handle their business if they did not appropriately review this then the Supreme Court would step in that also makes this a strong candidate for the Supreme Court to Grant the petition now of course the outcome here of this an case is very important for everybody it’s important not just because it would set Supreme Court precedent once again in because it would also impact New York but it would also impact a lot of other states like California who recently passed a similar law through sb2 that’s you know California’s new concealed carry restrictions uh right now I’m part of the litigation as well in California I’m one of the named plaintiffs in the crpa lawsuit myself and Reno May joined as plaintiffs and that’s being challenged right now and it’s also being reviewed by the ninth Circuit Court of Appeals who’s already signaled during some of the oral arguments that maybe they would just defer to what the second circuit said so maybe they would just adopt already what the second circuit said in the anono case find that SP2 in California is also not exceptional it’s not an exceptional case and therefore they don’t have to apply Bruin so that’s already what the ninth circuit is signaling so that’s why the Supreme Court’s review of this antino case is so important now recently what happened in this anonio case after that petition the Antonio case was scheduled for Supreme Court conference a couple times it went to conference and then you know we didn’t get any news no order list and then it was rescheduled and now I believe it’s been rescheduled twice the most recent reschedule in the most recent uh conference I believe happened on June 6th so the following week we were keeping an eye on the order list to see what happened now one of the interesting things with the anono case is that conference for anono also involved all the Illinois rifle magazine band cases now that following week on the order list we didn’t see in these cases on a grant or denial but then also we did not see a relisting of this case and then soon we pretty much got a signal that it would not be relisted for our new conference instead ANUK appears to be on hold now you may be asking yourself what does that mean what does that mean that antonuk now is on hold after it went to conference now that it’s not being re relisted what does that mean essentially what that signals is similar to what the Supreme Court did prior when they issued the Bruin decision they put cases on hold and they don’t make really any firm decision on them until they issue a bigger decision really what’s probably Happening Here is that the Supreme Court is set to rule on the rahimi case the rahimi case is going to come before the end of the Supreme Court term uh before the end of June early July likely the end of this month and that deals directly with the application of bruan and the Second Amendment when it comes to the federal restrictions on people in possession of firearms and ammunition who are subject to domestic violence restraining orders that is the rahimi case came out of the fif circuit the fif circuit onong panel said that using Bruins application using the Second Amendment this type of federal restriction was unconstitutional so the Supreme Court is set to rule in rahime and with this hold of the anonio case that signals that the Supreme Court believes that the rahimi decision is going to impact uh ANUK after rahimi you’re going to see probably a grant vacate and remand of the antonuk case back down to the second circuit for them to reconsider reanalyze this issue in light of what they say in rahime so this is all to say in summary right now anono has been placed on hold it has not been relisted for a new conference and this is signaling that it is likely going to be held until the Supreme Court issues their rahimi decision and once they issue the rahimi decision which we’re hoping now is going to be authored by Alo it’s going to be a favorable decision and then can be used in these cases like anonio and others send them back down to the lower courts for a Rec correction of what those second circuits and other circuits are saying and just misapplying Bruin so if any more information I will let you guys know also if you like this video and you would like to support the channel one of the best ways to do that is to like comment and subscribe all those things help to fuel the algorithm and it signals to YouTube that you guys see value in these videos and in this type of 2A news but as always thank you all for watching don’t forget to like And subscribe and never forget this nation with built B Scholars and this nation will be maintained B Scholars [Music]
Video Tags: Armed Scholar,armed scholar,hb 957 passed,hb 957 suppressor freedom,hb 957 abbott,hb 957 progress,texas suppressor bill,texas suppressor bill 2021,texas suppressor freedom bill,texas suppressor freedom,texas suppressor manufacturers,texas suppressor freedom act,texas suppressor act,texas suppressor bill explained,texas suppressor bill 957,texas suppressor bill update,texas suppressor bill passed,texas made suppressor,made in texas suppressor
Video Duration: 00:10:29
