Reaction & Commentary
Limited time we have had since we first saw the evidence here with you this week we have reason to believe that the house managers created false representations of tweets and the lack of due process means there was no opportunity to review or verify the accuracy consider these facts the house
Managers proud of their work on this snap impeachment staged numerous photo shoots of their preparations the Democrats just basically scammed everybody with all this in one of those manager Rasin is seen here at his desk reviewing two tweets side by side the image on his screen claims to show that President
Trump had retweeted one of those tweets now members of the Senate let’s look closely at this screen because obviously manager Rasin considered it important enough that he invited the New York Times to watch him watching it bogus it’s now what’s wrong with this image actually there are three things
Very wrong with it look at the date on the very bottom of the screen on manager rasen’s computer screen when we zoom in to the picture the date that appears is January 3rd 2020 H not 2021 why is that date wrong because this is not a real screenshot that he’s
Working with this is a recreation of a tweet and you got the date wrong when you manufactured this graphic you did not disclos that this is a manufactured graphic and not a real screenshot of a Tweet now to be fair the house managers caught this error before showing the
Image on the senate floor so you never saw it when it was presented to you but that’s not all they were hiding it fix this one look at the blue check mark next to the Twitter username of the account retweeted by the president it indicates that this is a verified
Account given the blue check by Twitter to indicate it is run by a public figure the problem the user’s real account is not verified and has no blue check mark as you can see were you trying to make her account seem more significant or were you just sloppy no they’re making a
Up if we had due process of law in this case we would know the truth but that’s not all that’s wrong with this one tweet house manager swell showed you this tweet this week and he emphasized that this tweet reflected a call to Arms he told you repeatedly that this was a
Promise to call in the Cavalry for January 6th he expressly LED you to believe that President Trump’s supporter believed that the president wanted armed supporters at the January 6th speech paramilitary groups the Cavalry ready for physical combat the problem is the actual text is exactly the opposite the Tweeter promised to bring the
Calary a public display of Christ’s crucifixion a s central symbol of her Christian faith with her to the president’s speech a symbol of faith love and peace they just never want to seem to read the text and believe what the text means you’ll see this reported in the media last evening
Also words matter they told you but they selectively edited the president’s words over and over again they manipulated video time shifting clips and made it appear the president’s words were playing to a crowd when they weren’t let’s take a look after this we’re going to walk down and I’ll be there with you
We’re going to walk down we’re going to walk down to the you want but I think right here we’re going to walk down to the capital we cut the video off and we’re going to cheer on our brave senators and congressmen and women and we’re probably
Not going to be cheering so much for some of them because you’ll never take back our country with weakness you have to show strength and you have to be strong he’s going to win in 2024 Trump we have come to demand that Congress do the right thing and only count the electors who
Have been lawfully slated lawfully slated I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol Building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard yeah Democrat and we are going to walk down to the capital they showed you that part why re walking to the capital
Well they cut that off to cheer on some members of Congress and not others peacefully and patriotically the Supreme Court ruled in Brandenburg that there’s a very clear standard for incitement in short to paraphrase whether the speech was intended to provoke imminent Lawless action and was it likely to do so no it
Wasn’t go to the capital and cheer on some members of Congress but not others they know it doesn’t meet the standard for incitement so they edited it down we heard a lot this week about fight like hell but they cut off the video before they showed you the president’s optimistic patriotic words
That followed immediately after we fight like hell and if you don’t fight like hell you’re not going to have a country anymore our exciting adventures and boldest Endeavors have not yet begun my fellow Americans for for our movement for our children and for our Beloved Country and I say this despite all
That’s happened The Best Is Yet To Come sad Democrats making this all up there’s that famous quote like one of the house managers said a lie will travel halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to put its shoes on well this lie traveled around the
World a few times made its way into the Biden campaign talking points and ended up on the senate floor the Charlottesville lie very fine people on both sides except that isn’t all he said and they knew it then and they know it now watch this but you also had people that
Were very fine people on both sides you had people in that group excuse me excuse me I saw the same you did you had people in that group that were there to protest the taking down of to them a very very important statue and the
Renaming of a park from Robert E Lee to another name no George Washington was a slave owner was George Washington a slave owner so will George Washington now lose his status are we going to take down excuse me are we going to take down are we going to take down statutes to George
How about Thomas Jefferson what do you think of Thomas Jefferson you like him okay good are we going to take down the statue cuz he was a major slave owner now we’re going to take down his statue so you know what it’s fine you’re changing history you’re changing culture
And you had people and I’m not talking about the neo-nazis and the white nationalists because they should be condemned totally but you had many people in that group other than neo-nazis and white nationalists okay and the Press has treated them absolutely unfairly now in the other
Group also you had some fine people but you also had troubl makers and you see them come the black outfit tell like it with the helmets and with the baseball bats you got you had a lot of bad you had a lot of bad people in the other
Group The treated unfairly s I’m sorry I just didn’t understand what you were saying you were saying the Press has treated white nationalists unfairly I just understand what we were saying there were people in that rally and I looked the night before if you look they were people protesting very quietly the
Taking down of the statue of Robert El Lee I’m sure in that group there was some bad ones the following day it looked like they had some rough bad people neo-nazis uh white nationalist they don’t want you to see all this but you had a lot of people in that group that
Were there to protest and very legally protest because you know I don’t know if you know they had a permit the other group didn’t have a permit so I only tell you this there are two sides to a story I thought what took place was a horrible moment for our country a
Horrible moment but there are two sides of the country does anybody have a final does anybody have you have an infrastructure what makes you think this might be today the first time the news networks played those full remarks in their context and how many times have you heard that President Trump has never
Denounced white supremacists now you and America know the truth know the truth now here’s another example one of the house managers made much of the president’s supposedly ominous words of you have to get your people to fight but you knew what the president really meant he meant
That the crowd should demand action from members of Congress and support primary challenges to those who don’t do what he considered to be right support primary challenges not violent action I know what he meant because I watched the full video and so did the house managers but
They manipulated his words yeah you will see where they stopped it and to give it a very different meaning from the meaning it has in full context let’s watch you have to get your people to fight he told them you have to get your people to fight and if they don’t fight
We have to primary the hell out of the ones that don’t fight you primary them we’re going to we’re going to let you know who they are I could already tell you frankly the people who need to fight are members of Congress why did we have to skip the
Necessary due diligence and due process of law and any that any legal proceeding should have it couldn’t have been the urgency to get president Trump out of office house Democrats held the Articles until he was no longer president mooding their case hatred animosity division political gain and let’s face it for
House Democrats let’s face it the house Democrats they wanted Trump out so bad they made up manipulated and did everything they could to try to keep keep him out now they got him out and all Trump was trying to do was saying let’s let’s just check and make sure
That the election is good let’s make sure the election is right let’s make sure the right person is is elected and not uh somebody that got you know that got in because of manipulation of our election process that’s all he was doing but these Democrats that hate Trump so
Bad that they’re going to do anything they can to try to keep him off if he’s on the ticket in 2024 I think he will looks like the Supreme Court’s going to come in and maybe say enough is enough got to let the guy get let the people
Vote and not have politicians Vote or not let have a court vote so I think if he’s on the on in 2024 he’s going to win by a landslide so what to see how that works thanks for watching I look forward to seeing you on the next one
