Full Senate Roundtable Speech

Video Transcript

Welcome to Truly Right View
Let The Truth Be Told!

Are you ready to hear the real truth unfiltered by bias media or government intervention?
Subscribe to the Truly Right View Channel

thank you very much Senator and it is a pleasure and an honor to be here I’m speaking today as a clinical research scientist this is an Endeavor with I with which I have some familiarity because I’ve conducted many such studies and I’m aware of their difficulty I’m also speaking as a clinician and a parent and a sometime philosopher of science we’ll start with the general in this discussion and move towards the specific generally it’s vital to understand that science itself is an ethical even a philosophical SL religious Enterprise why because the scientists who Advance Humanity inevitably operate within an a prior framework of Faith what are the elements of that faith belief that the world is orderly in its foundation its nature and its Spirit belief that such order is understandable to the mind of man and woman belief that the pursuit of such understanding is possible and laudable and a belief that good itself will come of the pursuit of understanding there’s a meta principle that underlies these more explicit rules and that is that the the understanding the understanding that the scientific aim must be true for the truth to be revealed this means that science aimed at career Prestige professorship and funding to say nothing of Darker motivations such as Pride revenge or the wish for Destruction is not science at all much of what purports to be Science Now is instead the the garnering of personal credit career advancement and economic gain that all derivative and essentially parasitic activity can temporarily produce this not does not result in truth we should also not be confusing medicine as currently taught and practiced with science the education of modern physicians may familiarize them with the basics of physiology and biology ology and the details of their specific practice this is by no means the same thing as teaching them how to conduct or evaluate scientific research which is something that takes years of specialized training to manage why am I making these points so that we understand explicitly that aim and ethical orientation Define the scientific Pursuit and so that we pay enough attention here today to establishing that aim and ensuring that orientation when you’re a scientist and you’re doing statistical analysis it’s easy to believe for example if you don’t know anything about science or statistical analysis that the statistical process is a mathematics machine into which you pour data and crank out truth and that is just absolutely not how it works at all when you’re doing statistical analysis you’re making a thousand micro decisions every single one of which is ethical you have to decide which numbers to include and which numbers to exclude and you have to understand why and you have to work against your own hypothesis and even against your own research interest to ensure that you’re not deluding yourself in the public and if you’re a careerist or interested in Prestige then all of that goes out the window and what you produce will be highly misleading to you and everyone else it’s and it’s very difficult to orient yourself so that you fight against that you have to be terrified of the falsehoods that you might produce and where they might lead you and everyone else and so now having considered that you have to start to understand what it is that should constitute your aim what would require in the case that we’re discussing to make America truly healthy again and to orient true scientists toward that aim it’s a retooling of the research Enterprise from the top down as well as the bottom up so that the goal would be clear the incentives aligned and the most productive actors identified rewarded encouraged and capitalized this could be facilitated politically by making a more specific goal clear we could begin that as we should by formulating an appropriate diagnosis we need to get the problem right what is the major problem what are the major problems bedeviling the American people one such is public health clearly and more so all the time despite the extensive government spending in that domain and despite the negligible attention historically paid to the details of health research and practice by the political class American children are fat diabetic and increasingly Miserable as they progress towards middle age those yet not captured in childhood by obesity in insin resistance high blood sugar and inflammatory dysfunction are likely to suffer it then with near certainty by the onset of a declining old age and expensively so what might what might we aim for instead slim healthy athletic optimistic and courageous children strong psychologically integrated generous adults resilient active productive seniors still contributing to their communities combined with either or both of much less spending or much better results for the cost how could this aim be accomplished within the community of Health focused researchers and practitioners and incentivized politically America faces a multi-dimensional diagnostic conundrum its people suffer from a plethora of symptoms and syndromes too high increasing body mass indices rising blood sugar levels Associated risk for psychological disorder immunological disregulation that increases risk of neurological degeneration cancer and heart disease to name a few my daughter referred earlier to her terrible childhood experiences inquiry and experimentation communication of all that and the social consequences among a multitude of people with various chronic health conditions what was her prime scientifically relevant realization the answer to this question what do all Fat Sick unhappy people have in common at least this they all eat how could that brute and singular fact be varied and studied is a technical discourse on the formulation of adequate scientific hypothesis epidemiological studies associating any given dietary habit with some outcome of Health inevitably fail trying as they are to establish a correspondence between only two factors in a sea of causal possibility science can only progress genuine science can only progress when such inquiry is simplified radically so that single variables of interest can be assessed for causal significance this is difficult to manage in the case of diet but it no longer seems impossible the reason because of the actual possibility of radical simplification on the food consumption side elimination diets offer a potential solution to this problem most of them make little sense however conceptually or scientifically they eliminate Foods in an often random and fattish manner often because of the spoken or unspoken ideological concerns of their proponents in addition they’re insufficiently simple the range of foods involved so that scientific analysis of causality can take place must be reduced to the minimum for genuine analysis of causality to take place you’re chronically ill you have a plethora of symptoms you eat a multitude of foods there’s some relationship between the food and the outcome at least in principle how are you going to determine that well no simple analysis is possible because of the multiplicity of factors both on the symptom side and on the dietary side so you reduce the complexity of your diet optimally to a single variable well that’s what my daughter Michaela did now we know some things about such reduction these are things that are important to know ketogenic diets switch the body to Fat metabolism so they constitute a step in that direction if you flip your body to fat metabolism and your and your symptoms decline then you know that the metabolic illness that you’re suffering from has some association with glucose metabolism now Michaela I believe or perhaps yeah it was Michaela mentioned the fact that uh for a century childhood epilepsy has been treated with a ketogenic diet because your brain won’t go into convulsions if you’re not feeding its sugar that’s a good example of simplification to a single variable now another alternative or associated uh issue with ketogenic diets is restriction of carbohydrate and sugar intake so they eliminate the contribution of the glucose dependent metabolic Pathway to obesity insulin resistance SL diabetes and inflammation your body can burn sugar or it can burn fat and in our society we run primarily on glucose metabolism but there’s no necessity for that not least because there is no recommended daily allowance for carbohydrate right you can live with zero carbohydrate and zero is not a lot so that’s a remarkable fact in and of itself given that the primary caloric Source in our diet that we have in our diet is actually carbohydrate so that can be eliminated and the consequences analyzed and that can happen relatively quickly and people can do it and it’s inexpensive and it doesn’t harm people so those are all very good things from a research perspective the consequence of a ketogenic intake switch to ketogenic intake can be analyzed as well you can monitor weight blood sugar and assorted symptoms of inflammation including those associated with psychological disorder the anecdotal evidence that we’ve picked up because many many people have communicated with our family is that the typical obese person can expect to lose 7 to 20 pounds per month on a ketogenic or plant-free ketogenic diet that that will continue month after month until virtually all of their body fat is eliminated that they can do that with no hunger although there will be some cravings which are not precisely the same thing and that that’s actually maintainable over the long run with that reduction in obesity comes radical Improvement in blood sugar for example and often an improvement in the kinds of psychological conditions that Dr Chris Palmer for example has been studying is a very remarkable concatenation of positive effects some of which are quite unexpected especially I would say on the depression and anxiety side because those have been you viewed for a very long time as you know consequences of Life stress and Trauma and that can happen but the fact that the psychological disorders seem amenable to treatment by ketogenic or plant-free ketogenic diets could be nothing short of a revolution because those are very intractable conditions and they’re also sources of unbelievably immense suffering plant-free ketogenic diets that’s a carnivorous diet let’s say or even more restricted a carnivorous diet that’s restricted to um to ruminant animals push that simplification to its extreme well why would you do that well if you’re trying to cond conduct a true scientific analysis let’s say of the relationship between diet and health you’d want to reduce the diet to the simplest possible underlying what what what would you say the simplest possible underlying maintainable structure and we know that that can be attained with a carnivorous diet you can live on that for a very long time um in fact whole societies have done that for like the Inuit in Northern Canada when they’ve survived on primarily meat for well their entire cultural history so we know that that’s possible if your symptoms don’t resolve in consequence well then there’s no loss except that it’s a difficult diet to attempt and if they do resolve well that’s a pretty good deal for you and then it’s inexpensive and there’s going to be all sorts of corollary benefits and then with any luck if your symptoms do resolve and you find the diet too restrictive you can start by introducing one food category at a time and carefully and so with any luck you’ll be able to get back to something approximating hopefully not a typical American diet that’s sugar and carbohydrate loaded but at least one that’s varied enough to maintain your interest none of this seems impossible and The more I’ve thought about this as a scientist and I I came to these conclusions with great hesitancy by the way because I know it’s quite a radical solution but as I was thinking it through as a scientist it just became more and more obvious it’s like you don’t want to hurt people when you’re attempting to generate a solution to a health problem that they have and a ketogenic diet certainly won’t hurt them it might help if it doesn’t well then you can stop doing it it’s very inexpensive it’s within at least in principle within the behavioral realm that people can attain can can manage and uh it’s simple enough so that you can actually do a causal analysis plus the results appear quickly enough so that that’s maintaining and rewarding it end of itself that’s a pretty good that’s a pretty good list of positive possibilities and so the there’s another Advantage as well with regards to ketogenic or plant-free ketogenic diets is that um the people on them don’t have to be hungry so most of the time when people are considering something like weight loss they think they have to go on a diet so they need to go on a diet they need to lose 30 lb or 40 lb or 50 or 100 lb and then the theory is they’ve lost the weight and they can go off the diet which they want to do because they’re always hungry on the diet and no one can maintain that and then they go off the diet they go back to their old eating habits and bang they weigh exactly what they weighed or more because that’s the typical pattern as a consequence of overeating in relationship to the food deprivation on a ketogenic diet you don’t have to be hungry you can eat as much as you want and they’re very satiating and so that doesn’t seem to be a problem and something that’s sustainable in the long run the most important thing however as far as I’m concerned from the scientific perspective is the radical simplification of the causal analysis right if you go on a ketogenic or plant-free ketogenic diet and your symptoms remit you know you know that there’s some relationship between what you’re consuming and the health outcome and so that’s exactly what you want to know if you’re chronically ill and maybe well then you’re fortunate as well because it’s remitted you can start to experiment and see if you can find out the actual cause and that opens up the scientific Endeavor to a much broader in a much broader way because that would mean that we could reduce the typical chronically ill person’s diet to a ketogenic or plant-free ketogenic diet and then we could do causal analysis with different classes of food to see which classes of food were contributing to which Downstream illnesses and so that would be a real good deal for everyone too and this like this sort of scientific endeavor is is it’s certainly technically possible it’s difficult to find participants and clinical research is a difficult Endeavor but none of this is impossible and the additional Advantage also is that it’s not going to hurt people okay so we’ll close with this what is the most logical upward aiming scientific approach to the problem of American Health identification of diet as the potential common mechanism radical simplification of that diet analysis of programmatic variation of that simplified diet as food items are added in by category 1 by one those with chronic andrac illnesses could thus well be placed by default on a plant-free ketogenic diet for the several mere months that it would take to assess the consequences this is a revolutionary but manageable proposition before it becomes a generalized standard of care however the relevant studies should be done we have more than sufficient anecdotal data pertaining to the positive effect of such simplified diets the testimony of thousands of people which is not sufficient to constitute proof but is certainly sufficient to justify hypothesis the goal is Health the approach is generally of upward aim and commitment to the truth the specific strategy is restriction of all extraneous dietary variables analysis of the consequences of that restriction and then systematic variation with the return into a more varied diet simple elegant implementable necessary the alternative given the crisis that confronts us on multiple Health fronts is Dreadful the continued sickening of the American people with all the unsustainable economic burden that sickening is and will continue to produce demoralization decline in productivity and spiraling health care costs that are already mounting to the point of unsustainability when we could replace that miserable future with something much brighter and healthier if we had the moral and political will to do so thank you very much [Music]

Truly Right View: Advocating for Free Speech in the Age of Political Censorship

Introduction: What is Free Speech Today?

In a world where political discourse is dominated by big tech, cable news, and social media influencers, free speech is constantly under threat. From censorship of conservative viewpoints to the silencing of dissent on controversial issues, we are witnessing an alarming trend of restrictions on the most fundamental rights of any citizen in our Constitutional Republic: the right to speak freely.

But what does free speech truly mean in today’s context? Are we protecting it, or are we allowing authoritarian ideologies like socialism, communism, fascism, and dictatorships to erode it?

The Constitutional Perspective: Why Free Speech is Non-Negotiable

The First Amendment of the United States Constitution is crystal clear: “Congress shall make no law… abridging the freedom of speech.” The Founding Fathers understood the importance of free speech in preserving a free society. Without it, the ability to challenge government, expose corruption, and advocate for truth would be crushed.

Yet today, under the guise of protecting people from “misinformation” and “hate speech,” powerful institutions are curbing our ability to express ideas that do not conform to their narratives.

Do we not see this as a slippery slope toward authoritarianism?

Shouldn’t we, as citizens, be the ones who decide what we can or cannot hear, not a centralized body or corporation?

Social Media and Cable News: Platforms or Gatekeepers?

Social media was once hailed as the bastion of free speech. It allowed ordinary individuals to share their thoughts, advocate for causes, and hold the powerful accountable. However, over the years, major platforms like Twitter (now X), Facebook, and YouTube have become gatekeepers rather than facilitators of free expression.

Algorithms favor certain ideologies, while alternative viewpoints—especially those with a more conservative or constitutional slant—are shadow-banned, demonetized, or outright censored.

Does this not resemble the tactics of monarchies, communistic or fascist regimes that control what their citizens can see and hear?

Shouldn’t a true democracy allow the free flow of ideas, even if those ideas challenge the status quo?

Social Media Influencers: Fighters for Freedom or Puppets of Censorship?

Many social media influencers, especially those aligned with constitutional values, have become modern-day warriors for free speech. Yet, they face intense backlash, censorship, and de-platforming for voicing opinions that challenge globalist or left-leaning narratives.

How many times have we seen influential voices banned simply for questioning government policies, election results, or health mandates?

Isn’t it concerning that only a select group of elites can decide what is “acceptable” discourse?

While some influencers fall in line with these restrictive policies, others have emerged as champions for free speech, using their platforms to resist censorship and uphold constitutional rights. The question is: Will we support these voices, or will we allow them to be drowned out by corporate and governmental censorship?

The Dangers of Socialism, Communism, and Fascism: A Threat to Free Speech

At the heart of socialism, communism, and fascism lies a common tactic—control over speech. These ideologies have historically sought to suppress dissent, limit expression, and create a monolithic narrative that favors those in power.

Look no further than authoritarian regimes past and present, where dissenters are imprisoned, media is state-controlled, and free speech is criminalized. Can we really ignore the striking similarities between these oppressive ideologies and the current state of political discourse in America?

Is the suppression of speech today not a precursor to more draconian measures tomorrow?

Should we not fight to preserve the right to freely express political, social, and economic ideas?

The Truly Right View: Defending Freedom in the Digital Age

At Truly Right View, we believe in the unwavering defense of free speech as enshrined in the U.S. Constitution. We reject the encroaching influences of socialism, communism, fascism, and any form of dictatorship that seeks to undermine this fundamental right.

Our platform is dedicated to bringing you uncensored news, analysis, and commentary from a truly constitutional perspective. We provide a space where voices that have been silenced or marginalized can be heard, and where you—the citizen—can engage in the free exchange of ideas.

Join the Fight: Sign Up for Our Channel and Newsletter

Do you value free speech?

Do you believe that the right to express your thoughts, opinions, and beliefs should never be compromised, no matter how controversial they may be?

If so, we invite you to join the fight for free speech by subscribing to the Truly Right View channel and newsletter. Stay informed on the latest developments in free speech advocacy, political commentary, and constitutional rights. Together, we can stand against the creeping influence of censorship and authoritarianism.

Why wait for others to defend your rights?

Become part of a movement that fights for the truly free society envisioned by our Founding Fathers.

Will You Speak Up or Stay Silent?

In the end, the future of free speech rests in our hands. We can either stand idly by as it is eroded by corporate and governmental overreach, or we can take action to protect and preserve it.

Will you speak up for your rights, or will you allow them to be taken away piece by piece?

The choice is yours.

Subscribe to the channel for Truly Right View today, and support our patriots shop together, let’s ensure that free speech remains the bedrock of our Constitutional Republic.