CIA CAUGHT Covering Up Lee Harvey Oswald Critical Backstory

Video Transcript

Welcome to Truly Right View
Let The Truth Be Told!

Are you ready to hear the real truth unfiltered by bias media or government intervention?
Subscribe to the Truly Right View Channel

joining us today is Jefferson Morley who’s the author of uh many books on the uh JFK uh assassination uh’ been investigating it for many decades how long 30 years so 30 years at this point you have a you have a new piece out and let’s put this up on the screen this is that his substack JFK facts which everybody should uh subscribe to uh one one thing that Jefferson is known for uh is almost never relying on Anonymous sources everything is document based and and people who are willing to put their name to something right uh this latest story is significantly based on an on an anonymous source which to me signals how important you think it is that’s true that you’re willing that you’re willing to go forward on so tell us what what this source told you and and why this is in advance on what we understand or at least adds new questions to what we understand about the assassination this Source approached me a few years ago go and um said in the course of working at the CIA had seen a document that Disturbed them and um so we talked about that I investigated a little bit found a lot to corroborate that um I also checked out the source professional expertise experience and I felt very confident um this source is highly credible and I wouldn’t like you say I rarely rarely use uh unnamed sources but in this case I felt if the source was willing to take the chance of disclosing classified information then I could take a chance on the source right do you feel like that this Source will ever come forward like we going to learn who this is at some point I think I think the sources will be willing to do that all right so let’s talk about what they told you though what did what did you what did they show you the The Source said two really significant things one that there was a file room in a CIA office in hearen Virginia where the CIA keeps its assassination related records now that doesn’t mean that those are all secret records those may be records that have been shared with the Congress we don’t know um but that there is a dedicated facility like that and I did some reporting talked to people who have worked in that building uh one of whom confirmed to me that there was a JFK facility within a a skiff a sec compartmentalized intelligence facility and um so I felt good about that um the second thing that the source said was that in the course of Duties at the CIA The Source had seen a document about the cia’s reaction to the Congressional investigation of the 1970s and the source felt that this document lengthy document 4050 Pages apparently produced by the CIA Inspector General ‘s office showed an intent to deceive the Congressional investigators they The Source says this document shows that they knew they weren’t being totally forthcoming and when Congress didn’t penetrate uh their deception they celebrated now there’s no document like that that’s been released in the past 30 years with all the JFK releases under Trump and Biden there’s no document that fits that description in the remaining 3500 JFK docment that still contain redactions so this document is not in the JFK collection obviously it should be one of the important things about the story and this made me also made me feel good was when I asked the CIA for comment they did not deny any of the facts in the story in fact they said something slightly disturbing if you if you parse their statement carefully what they’re saying is we’re under no obligation to release this document and if we want to keep it public we will got it and so one of the things you talk about in the story is about Oswald in Mexico yes and that’s that that that’s the core of what um what he’s talking about the the the the source says that the house select committee was called in and showed a bunch of documents about the CIA surveillance of Oswald in Mexico City shortly before the assassination of President Kennedy right the CIA has always said we never obtained any photographs of Oswald in Mexico City The Source says one of the things that he saw in the JFK file room was what looked like a video case um that was labeled Oswald in Mexico and dated 1963 now if there is photography of Oswald in Mexico City in the possession of the CIA today that that alone will rewrite the JFK story because they have been so adamant about denying this over the years and what you see the the larger point of the story here is that what you see is this fits a pattern of withholding information closely held information that the CIA had about Lee Harvey Oswald before the assassination and that’s what’s really going on here is they are withholding JFK documents to this day and the source of story makes that story you know makes that clear um and the fact that the CIA is not denying it not saying that doesn’t say the document doesn’t exist doesn’t say the the facility doesn’t exist you know we’re on to something so this is really about you know why does it matter today well this about accountability you know it’s about transparency we’ve had these assassination attempts on on President Trump lots of conspiracy theories um politicization of that obviously we need transparency we need credible investigations around that and the same goes for President Kennedy this you know this is a story that doesn’t go away in American politics we’re still talking about it 60 years later because of its symbolic importance and because you know we have this mistrust of government government institutions aren’t legitimate and if you look in the broad sweep of history when did U US Government begin to lose its credibility was right around 1964 according to the polls around the the waren commission report of 1964 since then that report not particularly credible with the American people confidence in government has been going down one of the theories that says actually there was there’s there’s a theory says there was no conspiracy to assassinate uh Kennedy and in fact what we’re looking at when it comes to CIA is C that they actually are just covering for their own incompetence and once and and then it snowballs into covering for their cover up and and does this fit that or does this fit the other I mean I think that this points more to complicity because of numerous false statements and the way CIA operations are structured this looks like a CIA operation not CIA incompetence but the available evidence I have good friends who argue the other way like you’re saying this is just they screwed up and they’re just covering their assets well that’s why we have the JFK records act the JFK records Act of 1992 says the government has to release all JFK records in its possession they have to review them and release them they have a presumption of immediate disclosure according to the law so if the cya explanation is right that doesn’t mean that they don’t have to disclose these records they do have to disclose them and if that’s the case then they should quell conspirac you know conspiracy theories and conspiracy theorizing and say we screwed up and here’s here’s how we did it but to say we’re innocent and we’re not going to share all the records with you that’s not credible h so yeah in that let’s take people back if they’re not all that familiar about Oswald’s Time in Mexico and the meetings that he allegedly was having there and how that would fit into a conspiracy explanation why is that significant oswal’s Time in Mexico so Oswald the accused assassin who denied we wrote a book put this up our man in Mexico yeah so the story that I tell in our man in Mexico is Lear V oal the man who will be accused of of of killing the president and who will deny it and then be killed in police custody goes to Mexico City 6 weeks before the assassination and visits the Cuban consulate and the Soviet Embassy seeking to get a visa to travel to Cuba right the Visa request is rejected he’s told yes to go get that in Washington and so Oswald returns to the United States what the CIA told the Warren Commission was we didn’t know anything about this guy um we did you know we knew so little about him we didn’t even get a picture of him a surveillance picture of him um as I report in our man in Mexico the station Chief in Mexico City W Scott said specifically that was not true he had a very sophisticated surveillance system around both of those unlike the CIA statement that the cameras weren’t working that day false investigators established that they were working and the CIA insists on this well we never got his we never took his picture mhm so in and in fact they knew a whole lot about him senior Cia officials are looking at oswal’s file six weeks before the assassination writing cables about him thinking about him and by the way not calling any attention to him despite the fact that he had been arrested for fighting with CIA funded group in that summer um he had a Russian wife when he defected to the Soviet Union he offered military secrets and now he’s visiting Soviet and and Cuban diplomatic compound where everybody in those working in those compounds was presumed to be an intelligence agent and most of them in those were just like a lot of people in the US Embassy were SP of course yeah and so um so the notion that they didn’t get his picture was you know was never particularly credible so what’s going on here did they just miss him well that would be the the cya we didn’t understand who he was he went on um and shot the president sorry Mrs Kennedy we just screwed up what’s hard to understand from our point of view today is you know the man who supposedly killed the president was welln to top CIA officials imagine if one of these accused assassins with President Trump was well known to a small group of top CIA officials would would that be would we say that’s relevant to the story yeah yes of course yeah the CIA hid all of that and all of those people who watched Oswald for four years as he made his way to Del Plaza none of them lost their job none of them even got so much as a dearit mostly because nobody knew over the last 60 years the story has come out in bits and pieces and my story now is just the latest part of we’re we’re getting behind that curtain of official secrecy that has always surrounded Oswald and Cuba operations and when we go through that curtain we see oh there’s still more classified stuff behind it yeah and that’s that’s what’s going on today is the CIA saying you know we we really don’t have to obey that law you know that law that says all JFK records we don’t really have to obey that and you know the CIA in the constellation of American power a very strong institution on JFK records they got what they wanted exactly what they wanted from two very different presidents from Trump who said all the JFK records were released in 2017 wasn’t true he had cut a deal with Mike Pompeo and the CIA and L lots of Records remain secret and Biden more unexpect more expectedly an institutionalist said CIA good guys they can handle it from here on out I wash my hands of the matter so that’s where it is right now Trump’s made a little bit of an issue of it saying he would release the JFK files when RFK endorsed him you know Trump had a chance to do it in 2017 he didn’t so it remains to be seen if he’s elected would he do would question of why we always talk about this all the people involved their debt presumably so why do they still care so much about keeping this secret because symbolically it’s really important and this is why they can’t even back up an inch because if they said we screwed up you know people get called up to Capitol Hill yeah they’d ask the director you know what’s going on here how did this happen how come you didn’t tell us about this you know they might get their budget cut so yes all the people involved are dead and you maybe the CIA could say you know that was then this is now but I think the path of least resistance and when you have the power of official secrecy we’re just going to bury that move along folks and you know this is what the CIA does presidents come and go journalists come and go the CIA is always there and so I think they’re thinking well you know we can just wait this thing out no that’s all I got I mean I guess last thing if you have a a minute uh people Al also point to this this uh police officer who claims that he accidentally squeezed the trigger I’m sure you’ve seen this one what do you think what do you make of this this is the most the most persistent hoax in the JFK story The the Secret Service man did it you’re going you’re going to see people in the comment section probably talk about this so tell us about this yeah the claim is that the Secret Service man panicked and turning around accidentally shot the president the only problem with this Theory is there’s no eyewitness evidence to support it there’s no forensic evidence to support it there’s no photographic evidence to support it and the author who first offered this when facing legal action from one of the Secret Service offers involved formally retracted the whole thing so there’s no evidence and it’s been renounced by the person who offered it so chances are there’s nothing to it yeah right okay but I just I want to say one last thing is you know people ask why does it matter today what you know what did Kennedy’s ass what was the political meaning of Kennedy’s assassination and I think it’s this this is more my opinion you can draw your you know the facts are the facts after Kennedy the most warlike faction in the US government always had the upper hand and Kennedy was steering us away from that trying to end the Cold War not going to war in Cuba pulling out slowly in Vietnam there’s debates about all of those things but the big picture that Kennedy articulates in the summer of 63 we don’t want a Pax Americana he says imagine that imagine if there was a Democratic candidate or a republican candidate who said we don’t want a Pax Americana we are in a Pax Americana era right now we are establishing Pax Americana in Ukraine Gaza you know we are trying to maintain that there is another way and the other way died with Kennedy mhm yeah and and whether the key thing to me is whether or not the CIA actually assassinated him every president since Kennedy including LBJ believed that they did yeah and operated according operated accordingly and yeah and this this is super important where there’s this discourse that tries to marginalize you know conspiracy theorist Harry Truman Lyndon Johnson and Richard Nixon had their foibles had their problems they were not conspiracy theorists these were men of power who understood how American power worked and none of them believed the cia’s story of a quote unquote terrified of them they were terrified of them in the FBI that’s right and it it governed a lot of their decision- making highly recommend people subscribe why Trump did not release the docum most likely yeah seriously yeah there you go uh subscribe to the substack buy the books appreciate you joining us sir thank you thanks a million guys absolutely we’ll see you guys later hey if you like that video hit the like button or leave a comment below it really helps get the show to more people and if you’d like to get the full show add free and in your inbox every morning you can sign up at breakingpoints tocom that’s right get the full show help support the future of Independent Media at breakingpoints tocom

Truly Right View: Advocating for Free Speech in the Age of Political Censorship

Introduction: What is Free Speech Today?

In a world where political discourse is dominated by big tech, cable news, and social media influencers, free speech is constantly under threat. From censorship of conservative viewpoints to the silencing of dissent on controversial issues, we are witnessing an alarming trend of restrictions on the most fundamental rights of any citizen in our Constitutional Republic: the right to speak freely.

But what does free speech truly mean in today’s context? Are we protecting it, or are we allowing authoritarian ideologies like socialism, communism, fascism, and dictatorships to erode it?

The Constitutional Perspective: Why Free Speech is Non-Negotiable

The First Amendment of the United States Constitution is crystal clear: “Congress shall make no law… abridging the freedom of speech.” The Founding Fathers understood the importance of free speech in preserving a free society. Without it, the ability to challenge government, expose corruption, and advocate for truth would be crushed.

Yet today, under the guise of protecting people from “misinformation” and “hate speech,” powerful institutions are curbing our ability to express ideas that do not conform to their narratives.

Do we not see this as a slippery slope toward authoritarianism?

Shouldn’t we, as citizens, be the ones who decide what we can or cannot hear, not a centralized body or corporation?

Social Media and Cable News: Platforms or Gatekeepers?

Social media was once hailed as the bastion of free speech. It allowed ordinary individuals to share their thoughts, advocate for causes, and hold the powerful accountable. However, over the years, major platforms like Twitter (now X), Facebook, and YouTube have become gatekeepers rather than facilitators of free expression.

Algorithms favor certain ideologies, while alternative viewpoints—especially those with a more conservative or constitutional slant—are shadow-banned, demonetized, or outright censored.

Does this not resemble the tactics of monarchies, communistic or fascist regimes that control what their citizens can see and hear?

Shouldn’t a true democracy allow the free flow of ideas, even if those ideas challenge the status quo?

Social Media Influencers: Fighters for Freedom or Puppets of Censorship?

Many social media influencers, especially those aligned with constitutional values, have become modern-day warriors for free speech. Yet, they face intense backlash, censorship, and de-platforming for voicing opinions that challenge globalist or left-leaning narratives.

How many times have we seen influential voices banned simply for questioning government policies, election results, or health mandates?

Isn’t it concerning that only a select group of elites can decide what is “acceptable” discourse?

While some influencers fall in line with these restrictive policies, others have emerged as champions for free speech, using their platforms to resist censorship and uphold constitutional rights. The question is: Will we support these voices, or will we allow them to be drowned out by corporate and governmental censorship?

The Dangers of Socialism, Communism, and Fascism: A Threat to Free Speech

At the heart of socialism, communism, and fascism lies a common tactic—control over speech. These ideologies have historically sought to suppress dissent, limit expression, and create a monolithic narrative that favors those in power.

Look no further than authoritarian regimes past and present, where dissenters are imprisoned, media is state-controlled, and free speech is criminalized. Can we really ignore the striking similarities between these oppressive ideologies and the current state of political discourse in America?

Is the suppression of speech today not a precursor to more draconian measures tomorrow?

Should we not fight to preserve the right to freely express political, social, and economic ideas?

The Truly Right View: Defending Freedom in the Digital Age

At Truly Right View, we believe in the unwavering defense of free speech as enshrined in the U.S. Constitution. We reject the encroaching influences of socialism, communism, fascism, and any form of dictatorship that seeks to undermine this fundamental right.

Our platform is dedicated to bringing you uncensored news, analysis, and commentary from a truly constitutional perspective. We provide a space where voices that have been silenced or marginalized can be heard, and where you—the citizen—can engage in the free exchange of ideas.

Join the Fight: Sign Up for Our Channel and Newsletter

Do you value free speech?

Do you believe that the right to express your thoughts, opinions, and beliefs should never be compromised, no matter how controversial they may be?

If so, we invite you to join the fight for free speech by subscribing to the Truly Right View channel and newsletter. Stay informed on the latest developments in free speech advocacy, political commentary, and constitutional rights. Together, we can stand against the creeping influence of censorship and authoritarianism.

Why wait for others to defend your rights?

Become part of a movement that fights for the truly free society envisioned by our Founding Fathers.

Will You Speak Up or Stay Silent?

In the end, the future of free speech rests in our hands. We can either stand idly by as it is eroded by corporate and governmental overreach, or we can take action to protect and preserve it.

Will you speak up for your rights, or will you allow them to be taken away piece by piece?

The choice is yours.

Subscribe to the channel for Truly Right View today, and support our patriots shop together, let’s ensure that free speech remains the bedrock of our Constitutional Republic.

Trending Tags

Trending Tags

Trending Tags

Trending Tags

Trending Tags

CIA CAUGHT Covering Up Lee Harvey Oswald Critical Backstory

Truly Right View: Advocating for Free Speech in the Age of Political Censorship

Introduction: What is Free Speech Today?

The Constitutional Perspective: Why Free Speech is Non-Negotiable

Social Media and Cable News: Platforms or Gatekeepers?

Social Media Influencers: Fighters for Freedom or Puppets of Censorship?

The Dangers of Socialism, Communism, and Fascism: A Threat to Free Speech

The Truly Right View: Defending Freedom in the Digital Age

Join the Fight: Sign Up for Our Channel and Newsletter

Will You Speak Up or Stay Silent?

War With Iran Looms as Biden and Netanyahu Edge Closer to Direct Conflict

Oversight group sues for communications between Harris, CBP as Congress gets stonewalled

Navigate Site

Follow Us

Welcome Back!

Create New Account!

Retrieve your password