Scientists Share NEW DISCOVERIES Pointing to GOD (Mind Blowing 15 Minutes!)

Video Transcript

Welcome to Truly Right View
Let The Truth Be Told!

Are you ready to hear the real truth unfiltered by bias media or government intervention?
Subscribe to the Truly Right View Channel

maybe you have pictures in your mind that suggest that you can get that out of primordial suit they they just weren’t that worried about the problem in the 1870s because they had a false idea of how simple life was they thought a couple reactions they’ figured out but but now you’ve got to figure out now they DNA how do you get that out of the primordial soup why hasn’t the okay so no no why hasn’t the whole scientific establishment said stop presses we have a problem isn’t that still the argument that if you give it enough time somehow or other it’s an immensely complex procedure but if you give it enough time enough shocks of lightning maybe we can’t do it in a lab but the real lab had billions of years at it what about the element of time time is your enemy and time is your enemy listen I don’t want you guys to be tricked I don’t want you guys to be deceived I don’t want you guys to be believing something that you were taught at some point in school but that is actually not scientifically true I want the reality of the situ situation to be laid on the table and then for you to make a determination for yourself what I find to be frustrating is when people are convinced of their conclusion based on false premises and in this particular video we’re going to go into some of those false premises it will be a test in your ability to withstand cognitive dissonance if you are believing in some of the things that again are presumed to be true but not yet proven to be true scientifically hang in there though I believe in you hang in there to the end of the conversation then at the end I’m going to give you guys some of my conclusory thoughts let’s do this thing I did my PhD uh on origin of Life biology and one of my Cambridge supervisors who also worked on the history of that field U had a well-known quotation she said that behind the question of the origin of life is a deeper question and that is the question of what are we trying to explain the origin of and in 1859 in the 1860s 1870s the scientists uh early evolutionary biologist assumed that that that question was going to be pretty simple and easy to to understand uh Thomas Henry they assume that why they assumed it because they thought life was very simple Thomas Henry Huxley who was Darwin’s famous Bulldog said that the the cell was a simple homogeneous globule of undifferentiated protoplasm and they thought that life was essentially a kind of chemic it was made of an an essential substance called protoplasm which was a kind of jello or goo that could be produced by a few simple chemical reactions and our knowledge of what the simple cell is actually composed of as Jim has just said has advanced massively since then Huxley had no idea Darwin had no idea what we would discover and now we know that inside living cells we have at the very least an information storage transmission and processing system which is part of a whole automated system for building proteins and protein machines these Nano machines that JY that gym makes as you correctly point out are are he puts it Child’s Play they he has these massive chemical recipes that are involved multiple steps interventions and manipulations to build the much simpler miniature machines that he can build they’re they’re much simpler than the ones that are that are found inside cells and and so the problem has as he puts it it’s receded off into the distance because the our knowledge of the complexity of life has meant that it’s that it’s much much harder to Vision how that might have Arisen by a series of undirected chemical processes reading your work Steve if I understand it correctly there’s a big moment and the big funnily enough the big moment happens at about the same time as the Yuri Miller experiments and that big moment is Watson and criek in 1953 and you get the double heel they understand the structure of DNA and suddenly they can see how complicated DNA is and every every living cell first of all that I want to make sure I get this right every living living cell contains DNA is this correct DNA RNA proteins so a few quotations that you present in your book signature in the cell Bill Gates DNA is like a computer program biotechnologist looy Hood DNA represents quote digital code Richard Dawkins himself the machine code of the genes is uncannily computer like close quote so doesn’t this pose just a gigantic new problem again let Stephen J Gould and Doc whatever they want to argue about Evolution we are concerned with this first box and it’s still empty and the first box is the first life I want to be clear there are Christian there are theistic evolutionists we’re not talking about Evolution we’re talking about the more primary problem of the origin of life itself and the fact that if there is information that dictates what happens inside of the most basic cell inside of the DNA that raises the question where did that information come from where did the instruction manual come from itself they will get into this in a second let’s let’s do it and not only is it empty but tour comes along and says oh you have no idea the simplest forms of life require such complex chemistry it is bre and then comes along and says well wait a minute fellas what about Watson and cric every cell contains DNA and you’re not going to create a three billion item long strand of DNA with hitting ammonia with lightning no matter how many times you do the experiment is that that correct this empty box is now a couple a source of awe really exactly if we go back to the the Miller Yuri experiment there’s two big classes of problems one is that they they synthesize the amino acids used using uh uh alleged Prebiotic gases they they synthesize it based on gases in that those flasks that don’t simulate the actual atmosphere on the early Earth but secondly the amino acids that they produced um were a mixture and there was a mixture of all kinds of other things that had to be eliminated for those amino acids to hook up in a way that would be life-friendly but that but they also didn’t explain how they would hook up and how they would hook up in the precise sequence to actually form proteins so it’s it’s like getting the it’s the difference between letters and words that that mean something you have a bag of Scrabble letters and you dump them on the on the on the table uh that does not give you a triple word score in the game okay but the Watson and cck Discovery is is seminal but it’s the beginning of a whole series of discoveries in what historians of biology Now call the molecular biological revolution in 1953 Watson and Crick elucidate the double helical structure of the DNA molecule but then 5 years later Francis Crick who was a code breaker in World War II realizes that the subunits along the spine of the DNA molecule are functioning like alphabetic characters in the written text or like the digital characters in a in a section of software in fact George Gamma One of the great physicists of the time re realized very quickly that the the the string of a c’s G’s and T’s along the spine of the DNA could be represented as a represented as a digital bit string and so what you have and what Crick realizes he calls this the sequence hypothesis is that DNA is contain it contains information for the construction of the proteins and protein machines that are needed to keep cells alive so it’s very much like our our modern uh CAD cam technology that’s used in in say a Boeing plant where an engineer will sit at a console write some code the code is then translated into another machine code that direct the function of a uh a manufacturing apparatus so maybe Boeing the the code from the engineer would would put the rivets on the airplane wing in just the right place or younger people are aware of these these 3D printers where we have digital information directing the construction of three-dimensional mechanical or other structures that’s what’s actually going on on inside cells you’ve got it’s not just that there’s code it’s code that’s directing the production of three-dimensional proteins and protein machines that are absolutely essential for everything the cell does so even the simplest cell contains DNA and DNA turns out and even I presume I’m putting it correctly correct me if I’m wrong even the simplest DNA turns out to be a fantastically complicated and sophisticated instruction manual right is that correct right and can I add one really quick cherry on top of this you could fit the entire internet in terms of the amount of information the amount of data into a single gram of DNA just to give you a sense of how much more sophisticated DNA is as a as a storehouse or as a technology than what we currently have think about the huge uh you know data storehouses think about the huge amount of physical material required to run the internet and then think about that all of all of that information can fit into a single gram of DNA whoever designed this thing is of a as a level of intelligence far greater than our own I’ll just go ahead and show my cards by saying that let’s continue for building very specific things that are needed to keep keep living cells alive so if you believe as Darwin believed that the first life was a blob of jello maybe you have pictures in your mind that suggest that you can get that out of primordial suit they they just weren’t that worried about the problem in the 1870s because they had a false idea of how simple life was they thought a couple reactions they’d figured out but but now you’ve got to figure out DNA yeah how do you get that out of the primordial suit why isn’t the okay so no no why isn’t the whole sign ific establishment said stop presses we have a problem is that’s what I’ve said I said time out I had a whole article called timeout I mean you’re sensing the frustration welcome to my world I mean this this is this is the problem this is the problem none of this works it’s a it’s a it’s a bunch of of Science Fiction it’s really nonsense what these guys are putting forward and they’re building their careers around this thing and money continues to this day 40 million 40 million euros was just designated to in 10 years figure out where life came from and there’s about 40 researchers that in Europe that are going to try to do this it’s really nonsense we don’t even know where to begin we don’t know how to take this the the simple building blocks what they’re going to end up doing and I’ll make a prediction right here what they’re going to end up doing is something that’s analogous to what Craig Venter has already done they’re going to take a living cell and they’re going to knock some parts out of it and then put the parts back in that they knocked out and saidy hey look we made life you didn’t make life you started you started with a living cell I mean this is what they started with a car you took the carburetor out of one car and put a carburetor from another car in and said hey look we we made a we made car because they’re not going to know where to begin there’s so many problems it’s not just five problems I I I talk about five problems because these are five you’re going to have to solve but that’s five of 5,000 that are facing you that just to begin none of these do we know how to make the polymers none of these do we know how to ass them we’re just lost on every every phase it is a it is a big scam one more question Jim I’m going to quote you again I’m quoting your article imagine that the world’s best synthetic chemists biochemists and evolutionary biologists have got combined forces to form a a team A Dream Team money is No Object they have at their disposal the most Advanced Analytical facilities the complete scientific literature since synthetic and natural coupling agents and all the reagents their hearts might desire they have a lot of things I don’t even understand but they have it all they have it all uh carbohydrates lipids amino acids and nucleic acids are stored in their Laboratories in a state of 100% Purity would the Dream Team I’m continuing to quote Dr tour would the Dream Team please assemble a living system take your time folks take a few billion years nothing well well well well okay Jim this expresses your frustration it’s par I get that but there’s one piece of this that still puzzles me you say take a few billion years isn’t that still the argument that if you give it enough time somehow or other it’s an immensely complex procedure but if you give it enough time enough shocks of lightning you maybe we can’t do it in a lab but the real lab had B ions of years at it what about the element of time time is your enemy enemy time is your enemy yes because those organic comp in the 50s George Wald famous scientist who worked on the original life problem said that time was the hero of the plot right give it enough time that what’s improbable will become inevitable but Jim has I’m perfect for you because I was using old textbooks in high school that were probably printed we all still get this yeah same stuff so the the compounds decompose all those beautiful chemicals that they have stored in their labs in 100% Purity after a few years they’re not 100% Purity in fact the RNA after a few weeks has undergone gone significant degradation so the whole idea is that oh well somehow one RNA formed and then it took off if you have one RNA molecule if you figure the half- life of R of RNA maybe a month in water uh you have to change that to a probability that one molecule has a few hours to survive it doesn’t survive just like your Pharmaceuticals it says don’t take this after one year you now you want to wait billions of years and see what it’s going to become everything goes bad with time these are not even stored in in very very strict conditions but even if they are there’s always a degradation rate so time is your enemy so if you happen to have all of those chemicals they’re all going to go bad nothing your time is your enemy it’s it’s the enemy of of of being uh able to do these things in fact every organic chemist knows this if they go home for the weekend without treating their compounds properly and bringing them on to a stable State they come back after the weekend and it’s it’s Fallen apart I mean you pay the price for this sort of thing so you don’t have the time time your en in these Miller Yuri type experiments there’s a problem called interfering cross Reactions where you get yes two or three maybe four or five protein for amino acids but there’s all kinds of other chemical compounds that are also synthesized in those same experiments and they will quickly react with the things you want and form in the case of the Miller Yuri experiment the sludge was called melanoid and that it’s moving in a life unfriendly Direction so what the chemist has to do is effectively intervene to remove the byproducts that are unwanted to allow only the things that are wanted to continue on in the simulation and but that’s chemist has to play God exactly it’s it’s an intelligent intervention and what is often presented as a very neat and tidy solved problem that that as if the world that we experience the reality that we experience can be fully answered fully explained on a pure materialistic worldview that’s what I’m contending against I’m saying no there are there are gaps inside of the materialist story about reality there are gaps that are not explained inside of the materialist story and I’m not making this video to to just default into or just to stuff God into those gaps I’m just saying that these gaps are real and that actually there’s information that is pointing towards an intelligent designer for example we know of nothing else that can create information other than mind and here inside of the the DNA within the cell we see a vast Storehouse of information so I’m not applying God into that Gap I’m saying let’s follow the evidence in the direction that we do every other time when you see a book you infer to an author when you see again the entire internet inside of a single gram of DNA it raises a pretty intuitive question where did that information come from where did the library of information that gives Specific Instructions to the cells in order for them to know what to do where did that library of information come from again I’m not saying that this video takes you all the way to Jesus of Nazareth I’m not saying that and I know the I expect in the comments which are the 4,000 gods are we talking about I understand that this type of video is only a beginning point or a stepping stone but I want to try to unravel some of the very strongly held beliefs that exist in the mind of many of my viewers that I can tell based on the comment section and I again I am an advocate of following the evidence wherever it might lead if you guys like Steven Meyer by the way he is going to be joining us next month inside of the wisdom Society we’re going to be reading his book The Return of the God hypothesis then he’s going to be joining us inside of a Q&A a live a zoom Q&A so that you can interact yourself directly with Steven Meyer if you don’t think you want to be a part of the wisdom Society for the year if you just want to hop in for a month just to be a part of the Steven Meyer chapter of the wisdom Society then consider joining it I really want people to benefit from the wisdom Society so if you’re interested in that if you’re interested in joining Steven Meyer in the wisdom Society click the link in the description thanks for watching this video I’ll see you guys in the next one if you enjoyed this video please consider joining the wisdom Society support the mission invest in yourself join the community

Truly Right View: Advocating for Free Speech in the Age of Political Censorship

Introduction: What is Free Speech Today?

In a world where political discourse is dominated by big tech, cable news, and social media influencers, free speech is constantly under threat. From censorship of conservative viewpoints to the silencing of dissent on controversial issues, we are witnessing an alarming trend of restrictions on the most fundamental rights of any citizen in our Constitutional Republic: the right to speak freely.

But what does free speech truly mean in today’s context? Are we protecting it, or are we allowing authoritarian ideologies like socialism, communism, fascism, and dictatorships to erode it?

The Constitutional Perspective: Why Free Speech is Non-Negotiable

The First Amendment of the United States Constitution is crystal clear: “Congress shall make no law… abridging the freedom of speech.” The Founding Fathers understood the importance of free speech in preserving a free society. Without it, the ability to challenge government, expose corruption, and advocate for truth would be crushed.

Yet today, under the guise of protecting people from “misinformation” and “hate speech,” powerful institutions are curbing our ability to express ideas that do not conform to their narratives.

Do we not see this as a slippery slope toward authoritarianism?

Shouldn’t we, as citizens, be the ones who decide what we can or cannot hear, not a centralized body or corporation?

Social Media and Cable News: Platforms or Gatekeepers?

Social media was once hailed as the bastion of free speech. It allowed ordinary individuals to share their thoughts, advocate for causes, and hold the powerful accountable. However, over the years, major platforms like Twitter (now X), Facebook, and YouTube have become gatekeepers rather than facilitators of free expression.

Algorithms favor certain ideologies, while alternative viewpoints—especially those with a more conservative or constitutional slant—are shadow-banned, demonetized, or outright censored.

Does this not resemble the tactics of monarchies, communistic or fascist regimes that control what their citizens can see and hear?

Shouldn’t a true democracy allow the free flow of ideas, even if those ideas challenge the status quo?

Social Media Influencers: Fighters for Freedom or Puppets of Censorship?

Many social media influencers, especially those aligned with constitutional values, have become modern-day warriors for free speech. Yet, they face intense backlash, censorship, and de-platforming for voicing opinions that challenge globalist or left-leaning narratives.

How many times have we seen influential voices banned simply for questioning government policies, election results, or health mandates?

Isn’t it concerning that only a select group of elites can decide what is “acceptable” discourse?

While some influencers fall in line with these restrictive policies, others have emerged as champions for free speech, using their platforms to resist censorship and uphold constitutional rights. The question is: Will we support these voices, or will we allow them to be drowned out by corporate and governmental censorship?

The Dangers of Socialism, Communism, and Fascism: A Threat to Free Speech

At the heart of socialism, communism, and fascism lies a common tactic—control over speech. These ideologies have historically sought to suppress dissent, limit expression, and create a monolithic narrative that favors those in power.

Look no further than authoritarian regimes past and present, where dissenters are imprisoned, media is state-controlled, and free speech is criminalized. Can we really ignore the striking similarities between these oppressive ideologies and the current state of political discourse in America?

Is the suppression of speech today not a precursor to more draconian measures tomorrow?

Should we not fight to preserve the right to freely express political, social, and economic ideas?

The Truly Right View: Defending Freedom in the Digital Age

At Truly Right View, we believe in the unwavering defense of free speech as enshrined in the U.S. Constitution. We reject the encroaching influences of socialism, communism, fascism, and any form of dictatorship that seeks to undermine this fundamental right.

Our platform is dedicated to bringing you uncensored news, analysis, and commentary from a truly constitutional perspective. We provide a space where voices that have been silenced or marginalized can be heard, and where you—the citizen—can engage in the free exchange of ideas.

Join the Fight: Sign Up for Our Channel and Newsletter

Do you value free speech?

Do you believe that the right to express your thoughts, opinions, and beliefs should never be compromised, no matter how controversial they may be?

If so, we invite you to join the fight for free speech by subscribing to the Truly Right View channel and newsletter. Stay informed on the latest developments in free speech advocacy, political commentary, and constitutional rights. Together, we can stand against the creeping influence of censorship and authoritarianism.

Why wait for others to defend your rights?

Become part of a movement that fights for the truly free society envisioned by our Founding Fathers.

Will You Speak Up or Stay Silent?

In the end, the future of free speech rests in our hands. We can either stand idly by as it is eroded by corporate and governmental overreach, or we can take action to protect and preserve it.

Will you speak up for your rights, or will you allow them to be taken away piece by piece?

The choice is yours.

Subscribe to the channel for Truly Right View today, and support our patriots shop together, let’s ensure that free speech remains the bedrock of our Constitutional Republic.

Trending Tags

Trending Tags

Trending Tags

Trending Tags

Trending Tags

Scientists Share NEW DISCOVERIES Pointing to GOD (Mind Blowing 15 Minutes!)

Truly Right View: Advocating for Free Speech in the Age of Political Censorship

Introduction: What is Free Speech Today?

The Constitutional Perspective: Why Free Speech is Non-Negotiable

Social Media and Cable News: Platforms or Gatekeepers?

Social Media Influencers: Fighters for Freedom or Puppets of Censorship?

The Dangers of Socialism, Communism, and Fascism: A Threat to Free Speech

The Truly Right View: Defending Freedom in the Digital Age

Join the Fight: Sign Up for Our Channel and Newsletter

Will You Speak Up or Stay Silent?

Liberals Will Stop at Nothing to Destroy Marriage, and Here’s WHY|| Thomas Sowell Reacts

The Threat People Like Obama and Neil deGrasse Tyson Pose to America || Thomas Sowell Reacts

Navigate Site

Follow Us

Welcome Back!

Create New Account!

Retrieve your password