Zelensky's Plan to Drag the U.S. Into World War III | Jordan Schachtel

Video Transcript

Welcome to Truly Right View
Let The Truth Be Told!

Are you ready to hear the real truth unfiltered by bias media or government intervention?
Subscribe to the Truly Right View Channel

it’s somewhat easy to forget but the war in Ukraine is still raging and as it does the US inches perilously closer and closer to World War II since Russia invaded Ukraine in January of 2022 a combined 1 million individuals have died on both sides of this conflict the United States meanwhile has sent 55.7 billion doll that’s your money and mine in military assistance to the Eastern European country and Congress has approved upwards of 175 billion in both Aid and Military assistance to support the Ukrainian government headed by Ukrainian president zalinsky and its allies so the US is essentially footing the bill for this war in Ukraine and if Ukraine has its way we will probably be paying for it for quite some time possibly even with American soldiers on Monday Ukrainian president vmir zalinski took time out of his very busy schedule to make a de facto campaign pit stop for vice president kamla Harris at a Munitions Factory the Keystone State of Pennsylvania all the while begging for the cash flow to keep on coming from Uncle Sam zalinsky a long time alongside Governor Josh Shapiro signed bombs in the name of democracy of course it was essentially a Tas and endorsement for Kam La Harris who wants to keep that gravy train flowing for Ukraine just as long as she possibly can zelinsky’s trip by the way was paid for in part by the good old American taxpayer you and me in case you’re wondering how he afforded such a trip in the midst of a war War so expensive that he requires us to pay for that war now you would think ziny wants his country to win the war right but have we stopped to think about what does that actually mean to zilinski has anyone bothered to investigate or even ask zalinsky for a definition of victory well it doesn’t seem like anybody’s interested in that at least on the side of the left or the mainstream media what is winning for Ukraine actually look like except from Republican senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina we do have an answer to this question he’s repeatedly said we need to get rid of poop Putin talk about inviting World War I if I’m Putin I view America subsidizing Ukraine’s military as war between Russia and the US and then top it off with American Senators talking about unseating Putin How do you think Putin is going to react but maybe World War II is exactly what zalinski wants because the one politician who has said it’s time to end the war yeah that’s right Donald Trump that’s the politician zilinski criticizes zilinsky hacked president Trump calling he and Senator JD Vance inept and radical isn’t it funny how they use the same words that should be used to describe themselves as an insult for their opposition this is what zalinsky claimed this is his quote my feeling is that Trump doesn’t really know how to stop the war even if he might think he knows how with this war oftentimes the deeper you look at it the less you understand isn’t that funny of course we the people we can’t understand it only zilinsky has to tell us how to think an interesting comment to make considering that under Trump the world was at peace a peace not seen in Generations in fact Trump was remarkably good at foreign policy and zalinsky should remember that Russia invaded Ukraine under President Barack Obama and then again under President Joe Biden When Donald Trump was in office Putin dared not go near Ukraine Trump negotiated the Abraham Accords as well forced NATO countries to pay more of their fair share and effectively wiped out Isis so the idea that Trump wouldn’t know how to negotiate an end to this Ukraine war seems a bit proster prepost and I suspect zinsky knows that well it only seems Preposterous if you’ve already written off negotiations to end the war Al together and I think that may be key here it appears that zalinski already has written off negotiations the Ukrainian leader went on to blast JD Vance Trump’s running mate saying that he was quote dangerous and that Vance’s message seems to be that Ukraine must make a sacrifice but I believe zilinsky said that we have shielded America from Total War yeah right first of all all negotiations require sacrifice countries who are losing Wars as Ukraine arguably is or who are in a stalemate which Ukraine is at best don’t quite have the leverage at the negotiating table hence sacrifices of some sort are required if you value human life so yeah Ukraine should have made concessions to Russia a long time ago not because Putin is morally correct he’s not but because one million people have died and Ukraine is never going to win outright unless they concede some land and put a stop to this war but you have to want to put a stop to a war to put a stop to a war otherwise what zalanski is doing is he’s asking of the world a suicide mission funded by us it’s outrageous it’s anti-humanity and now zalinski is here in the United States to coerce you and I to be part of this suicide mission on Thursday he’s going to the White House to present the Biden Administration with what he calls a victory plan sources say that a key part of the plan hinges upon the US giving Ukraine permission to use long range missiles to fire into Russia the Kremlin has said that if that happens then Russia would consider itself at war with NATO and can you blame them for thinking that way it’s actually rational thinking if Russia attacked a NATO country then the us would have boots on the ground against nuclear a nuclear superpower but for some reason zalinski says that if the US doesn’t go along with his so-called Victory plan then the US will find itself in a very long protracted War what so here to break it down if from the dossier if you don’t subscribe on substack to the dossier I highly recommend that you do he’s one of my favorite journalist because he’s correct about his reporting and he’s honest it’s Jordan shakel Jordan good to see you hey Liz great monolog thanks for the intro okay Jordan tell me what’s going on here because it seems obvious that when you start a war you should have a goal in mind and a way to achieve that goal being Victory and I don’t believe that they don’t have one I think that they’re not revealing it to us am I wrong yeah geopolitically speaking they’re in an increasingly more um untenable position at the beginning of this war it’s probably the best chance to negotiate for peace um we’re you know several years in now and they keep slowly the ukrainians keep slowly losing land to kind of this slow moving Russian um push into eastern Ukraine uh specific Al taking lands that have historically been friendly to the Russian people and the Russian government so they’ve been playing this well playing this strategically um without having to worry about so much of domestic um push back within these um cities and towns that you know have historically been held by uh multiple countries so they don’t really feel such a strong allegiance to Ukraine I mean it’s such a different situation like you you find all of these modern historians and pundits and think tankers all using the World War II analogy but it’s such a different situation you have this nuclear powered borderline superpower versus an impoverished country um of people who have very similar um you know ethnic and historic descent and ancestry so it’s it’s a completely different situation and what I find is that you know unfortunately the leadership in Ukraine has totally failed their people um zalinski in particular you know I have a couple thoughts on him I don’t because like his position is so ridiculous um he wants to take back Crimea which has been in Russia’s hands for a decade now and the people of Crimea don’t want that so like how exactly would that um occur and you have all these like weird problems with this maximalist position that zilinsky is taking and I think he’s serious about it which is alarming and if he’s serious about a position of no concessions ever then the war is going to continue in perpetuity and my second thought on this is that zilinsky doesn’t really have much control over his own country’s Affairs um he’s kind of surrendered the economy to outside forces um what happens in war is that you know the economy takes a huge hit he’s had to take out all these loans and he’s very much beholden to kind of like this Western Coalition um on Wall Street and in Washington so who’s really calling the shot what I I I agree with you that economies take a hit so uh during war that’s obvious that’s happened in every war that I can ever think of but what do you mean he took out loans and he’s not being controlled or he’s not in control someone’s controlling him right so so at the at the onset of the war and of course this goes back um many years and decades you know the history of the conflict but at the onset of the war um Ukrainian National Bank and and the Ukrainian currency took a huge hit um and they were in Dire Straits immediately you know they were already in really bad position Ukraine is one of the top three poorest countries in Europe so you’re already in awful position and then you have people like Black Rock coming in um and kind of like buying up their nation state essentially and and granting them loans um arguably they needed these Black Rock came into Ukraine and bought up like pieces of the significant pieces of the Ukrainian economy I don’t I don’t think that they bought the land but you know the loan loans were made and and Loans need to be paid back and in exchange for loans you know these these people and institutions are going to want something and this is kind of how um superpowers and their you know attached uh Financial networks control uh small countries so I I think that zalinski has some autonomy but it’s much more limited than I would say the corporate media is leading on so it do you view him the way that we all probably view Joe Biden at this point that yeah he’s the figurehead but he’s not the one he’s basically a puppet he’s there’s someone else is pulling the strings I I view him similar to like a jack dorsy when it became clear that the board of Twitter had been completely overtaken by all these other outside uh powerful forces and unfortunately Jack at the time decided to go full you know black Trans lives matter mode and and just endorsing like the hyper woke corporate speak instead of like you know similar to like a guy like Zuckerberg you know Facebook is entirely controlled too um and they’ve chosen not to speak out so zilinsky I think does not he wants to play the game he wants the you know the the political Prestige he wants the favors he is in a position to call for an end to the conflict but he’s certainly you know he’s he’s following the message he’s he’s the Lindsey Graham of Kiev unfortunately well well the way that I view this is not only an anti-humanity War because what’s the interest of the Ukrainian people and the Russian people too right Russian soldiers aren’t necessarily ideologically aligned with Putin they don’t necessarily want to die in a war with Ukraine some of them maybe do I don’t know but a million people is not something to just a million people who’ve died is not something to just dismiss so not only is this an anti-humanity War something that Ukraine can’t practically I don’t think any military strategist would say oh yeah Ukraine’s in a position where they can demand everything and not negotiate at all that’s just absurd I view this as a globalist exercise because if the United States continues to give blank checks essentially to Ukraine and it’s not just oh taxpayers are footing this bill they’re printing money which devalues our currency then this ends up not only causing inflation here domestically we’re on the path to the US dollar being so devalued that it’s going to be abandoned as the world Reserve currency which is our primary the United States our primary negotiating or our primary leverage in negotiations around the world it’s not because we’re constantly threatening to use our military power against other countries it’s because our economic power is so strong that countries who want to keep doing business with us kind of do have to at least align somewhat with our values or not Annoy Us too bad and if we lose that then we’ve lost our status in the world so I view this as the globalist trying to take the United States down without using military conflict directly with the United States unless it’s necessary yeah and I agree with you 100% ultimately the biggest losers are the Ukrainian people who are losing everything they’re losing their sovereignty they’re losing their well-being their families um everyone who’s close to them either physically emotionally spiritually um you know they have to be able to find a way out and and you know this is not again a you know Winston Churchill the Nazis are coming type moment it’s such a historically different uh situation there is no parallel to World War II and it it comes down to Ukraine’s going to have to make a tough deal and they’re going to have to hope that Russia is willing to give a little back I think that maybe Russia would give a little back under a trump presidency um but like there’s some non-starter issues like Crimea like some other cities that you know Russia probably lost 50,000 troops to to uh win and hold so um you know I I totally dismiss the idea that Russia’s trying to um you know impose a genocide upon the Ukrainian people but if this war continues for a long enough time Ukraine’s just going to continue to lose more chunks of their country um you know if you have hostile forces in your lands they’re not just going to like sit around forever they’re just going to keep pushing forward but um I I I hope for the sake of Ukraine really that Trump wins and really demands that both sides get to the negotiating table and you know there’s many incentives like for Russia too to want to end this war um and Ukraine it’s obvious but for for Russia you know they’re they’re not really you know in an economically strong position they have a lot of problems of their own too and they probably want to re access um Global Financial markets that no you know American citizen can put a dollar into Russian markets and that has been you know a significant blow to the Russian economy um they found ways to counteract that through partnering with China and and India and elsewhere but you know there’s no Force like the American market and I think Trump really understands that so you know if Russia wants to come back to the table and be a part of the global Community you know even if it was unfair or Fair it doesn’t really matter the moral morality of the situation I think that’s the bargaining chip to bring Russia to the table and maybe have them give a little bit of the land back but yeah I totally agree this war needs to come to an end and with people like zilinsky in charge of Ukraine it just it’s hard to Fathom that unless he’s just forced to do something so what do you think that would look like if president Trump wins in what are we 40 40 odd days until the election what is that going to look like Trump says that he’s going to be able to negotiate an end to this War I mean all presidential candidates talk about this proverbial day one on day one I’ll do this and he basically has made that same promise about the war do you think that’s realistic will he be able to get that done I I think he’ll be able to get it done eventually I don’t know about the day one stuff but uh you know there’s definitely a path forward you there there’s there’s leverage on Ukraine and there’s leverage on Russia I mean I I could see perhaps um Trump dangling one more Aid package and if you if you take the aid you need to end the war you know that kind of thing because they they really um the money is not being properly distributed you know there’s all these Infamous stories about you know these Ukrainian commanders um signing for these weapons with you know they they draw up the receipt and just like hand it to the American officials and they’re like oh okay I guess that’s good but you know a lot of the money and weapons who knows where that stuff is going so you have to assume that the hundreds of billions of dollars in Aid that we’ve given to Ukraine have not gone to the Ukrainian people it’s just effectively like a money laundering scheme for the people in charge over there and for the defense industry to kind of here to like pump their um Public Market bags a little bit so um I think that there’s a lot of Leverage that Trump can impose on both sides and and you know it’s it’s in the interest of both sides if they’re thinking rationally to end the war um but we’re in a very irrational environment where you have um and I very much blame the Biden administ ation and the Obama Administration before that for imposing this madness because you know they were hyper aggressive on the Eastern Ukrainian border encouraging people basically to lob missiles at Russia but without an effective deterrent so it was like the worst of Both Worlds um Russia was fed up with the situation on the border and then Russia got hyper aggressive um and I think made a miscalculation because they don’t want to be shut off from the global economy either so yeah there there’s definitely a path to peace and I think Trump you know has a lot of smart people around him and a lot of um you know freethinking um geopolitical and foreign policy Minds who can get something like that done right you mean not like Lindsey Graham the other thing by the way this is worth noting that when when someone likes zinsky it seems to be on a suicide mission because that’s what it seems like he does this because he himself feels insulated he himself feels protected he’s not going to go die on the front lines as he forces other people to do that and if you have a leader that’s behaving in that manner then you know that they are worse than a fraud worse than a hoax that doesn’t even dis accurately describe that kind of behavior that so Cavalier with human life it’s downright evil Jordan thank you for uh analyzing this and everyone go subscribe to the dossier on substack thanks for being here yeah thanks so much appreciate it

Truly Right View: Advocating for Free Speech in the Age of Political Censorship

Introduction: What is Free Speech Today?

In a world where political discourse is dominated by big tech, cable news, and social media influencers, free speech is constantly under threat. From censorship of conservative viewpoints to the silencing of dissent on controversial issues, we are witnessing an alarming trend of restrictions on the most fundamental rights of any citizen in our Constitutional Republic: the right to speak freely.

But what does free speech truly mean in today’s context? Are we protecting it, or are we allowing authoritarian ideologies like socialism, communism, fascism, and dictatorships to erode it?

The Constitutional Perspective: Why Free Speech is Non-Negotiable

The First Amendment of the United States Constitution is crystal clear: “Congress shall make no law… abridging the freedom of speech.” The Founding Fathers understood the importance of free speech in preserving a free society. Without it, the ability to challenge government, expose corruption, and advocate for truth would be crushed.

Yet today, under the guise of protecting people from “misinformation” and “hate speech,” powerful institutions are curbing our ability to express ideas that do not conform to their narratives.

Do we not see this as a slippery slope toward authoritarianism?

Shouldn’t we, as citizens, be the ones who decide what we can or cannot hear, not a centralized body or corporation?

Social Media and Cable News: Platforms or Gatekeepers?

Social media was once hailed as the bastion of free speech. It allowed ordinary individuals to share their thoughts, advocate for causes, and hold the powerful accountable. However, over the years, major platforms like Twitter (now X), Facebook, and YouTube have become gatekeepers rather than facilitators of free expression.

Algorithms favor certain ideologies, while alternative viewpoints—especially those with a more conservative or constitutional slant—are shadow-banned, demonetized, or outright censored.

Does this not resemble the tactics of monarchies, communistic or fascist regimes that control what their citizens can see and hear?

Shouldn’t a true democracy allow the free flow of ideas, even if those ideas challenge the status quo?

Social Media Influencers: Fighters for Freedom or Puppets of Censorship?

Many social media influencers, especially those aligned with constitutional values, have become modern-day warriors for free speech. Yet, they face intense backlash, censorship, and de-platforming for voicing opinions that challenge globalist or left-leaning narratives.

How many times have we seen influential voices banned simply for questioning government policies, election results, or health mandates?

Isn’t it concerning that only a select group of elites can decide what is “acceptable” discourse?

While some influencers fall in line with these restrictive policies, others have emerged as champions for free speech, using their platforms to resist censorship and uphold constitutional rights. The question is: Will we support these voices, or will we allow them to be drowned out by corporate and governmental censorship?

The Dangers of Socialism, Communism, and Fascism: A Threat to Free Speech

At the heart of socialism, communism, and fascism lies a common tactic—control over speech. These ideologies have historically sought to suppress dissent, limit expression, and create a monolithic narrative that favors those in power.

Look no further than authoritarian regimes past and present, where dissenters are imprisoned, media is state-controlled, and free speech is criminalized. Can we really ignore the striking similarities between these oppressive ideologies and the current state of political discourse in America?

Is the suppression of speech today not a precursor to more draconian measures tomorrow?

Should we not fight to preserve the right to freely express political, social, and economic ideas?

The Truly Right View: Defending Freedom in the Digital Age

At Truly Right View, we believe in the unwavering defense of free speech as enshrined in the U.S. Constitution. We reject the encroaching influences of socialism, communism, fascism, and any form of dictatorship that seeks to undermine this fundamental right.

Our platform is dedicated to bringing you uncensored news, analysis, and commentary from a truly constitutional perspective. We provide a space where voices that have been silenced or marginalized can be heard, and where you—the citizen—can engage in the free exchange of ideas.

Join the Fight: Sign Up for Our Channel and Newsletter

Do you value free speech?

Do you believe that the right to express your thoughts, opinions, and beliefs should never be compromised, no matter how controversial they may be?

If so, we invite you to join the fight for free speech by subscribing to the Truly Right View channel and newsletter. Stay informed on the latest developments in free speech advocacy, political commentary, and constitutional rights. Together, we can stand against the creeping influence of censorship and authoritarianism.

Why wait for others to defend your rights?

Become part of a movement that fights for the truly free society envisioned by our Founding Fathers.

Will You Speak Up or Stay Silent?

In the end, the future of free speech rests in our hands. We can either stand idly by as it is eroded by corporate and governmental overreach, or we can take action to protect and preserve it.

Will you speak up for your rights, or will you allow them to be taken away piece by piece?

The choice is yours.

Subscribe to the channel for Truly Right View today, and support our patriots shop together, let’s ensure that free speech remains the bedrock of our Constitutional Republic.