The Brink Of Collapse: "Liberals & The Government Has Become A Cancer To Society" | Bret Weinstein

Video Transcript

Welcome to Truly Right View
Let The Truth Be Told!

Are you ready to hear the real truth unfiltered by bias media or government intervention?
Subscribe to the Truly Right View Channel

what are the values and beliefs that you use to decide who you’re going to vote for it’s a good question uh let me say that I find the idea of politics horrifying and I take no pleasure whatsoever in having to interact with that space at all I feel like it’s beneath all of us that said so much rests on what happens in that space that I don’t feel that I really have a choice and at the moment barring something like the discovery that I have a brain tumor that is distorting my perspective on the world what is at stake in our current political environment is at an all-time high and therefore I feel like like it or not we’re all being forced in this direction as to the specific answer to your question I like the distinction between values and beliefs that’s also how I see the world I have many beliefs that don’t make me happy but nonetheless it would be irresponsible I think to shed them because of that whether they’re good or bad is has no implication about whether they’re true and I guess I live by a a set of guiding principles that that answer that question pretty well um one of them is that we are misled by our evolutionary wiring into being focused on ourselves and our own experience for reasons that are simply practical and that causes us to have a distorted approach to the world in which we have the power to make things better but also vastly worse that exceeds anything that our ancestors would have had at their disposal and so our responsibility is much greater but our wiring doesn’t necessarily detect that and I would say the the overarching principle that guides me is I believe that existing as a human being is a profound it is the profound opportunity that we know of in the universe that it’s one thing to live that’s amazing and lots of creatures live and presumably they feel rewarded when they do well and things like that but our ability to understand where we are and what it implies and the con consequences of our actions and for our an actions to become consequential by virtue of our thinking through what they will be that’s a remarkable experience and it creates a life like no other that we’re aware of so my sense is I’m obligated I believe all of us if we saw this picture would find ourselves morally obligated to provide that opportunity in as liberating a way as possible to as many humans as we can that is to say we’re not entitled to take what we what we found on arrival and degrade it now sometimes you have to degrade it a little bit you don’t have a choice or you have to degrade it a little bit in the present in order to preserve it in the long term so I’m I’m not a um I’m not unrealistic about the need to to bend the rules a little bit but in general the long-term trajectory ought to be to make sure that the generations that follow us have at least as good an opportunity as we did which means at least as intact a planet as we inherited and the political Dimension obviously has has profound implications over how close we are to that I believe we’ve been falling down on that job for generations and it’s time to turn the ship around but that’s really what motivates me and the fact is I have two children I love them deeply and thinking about their prospects in life makes it very easy for this to be a concrete question that tells me what direction I should go all right so what I heard in that is obviously thinking about future um Generations is incredibly important don’t be selfish don’t gobble everything up right now um but it uh also feels like and I’ve heard you say this before so I think I’m correct in hearing that you worry that right now due to I would assume technology that we have for the first time maybe ever the opportunity for a true existential crisis where we could end The Human Experience or just Flatout existence as we know it is that overstating it or is that actually what’s driving your thinking in this moment no that’s uh that’s accurate I would say we have something like a Russian doll of existential threats where there we have built a civilization that does remarkable things but it is not the beneficiary of thousands of years years of perturbations and breakages that would have made it wise and antifragile it’s in fact incredibly fragile and at this point even the Dynamics of our galaxy threaten to turn our technology into a fatal flaw for our species so that’s not entirely our fault that’s the fact that we built something under circumstances that were more hospitable than the ones we’re about to face and so you know I I think we should be focused on that the fragility of our system is a problem and there is not a natural feedback that causes you to make your civilization less fragile while times are good what is it about this particular election that has you on edge what do you see in the system um that is making this worse than say growing up in the 80s when I legitimately was having conversations with my neighbors about hey mutually sure destruction means that they’re never going to drop nuclear bombs like it was a super tense time um what is it about right now um so I’m I’m caught in a bind I find myself in all the time which is there are things if I was a political animal there are things that I should say right now to increase the likelihood of us going in a direction that I think is beneficial even though those things aren’t exactly an overlap for what what I believe because I’m not a political animal but I’m forced to engage the political sphere I have to run the risk of being fully candid and hoping that people will infer the correct direction so to to put a little Flesh on those bones what makes this profoundly different is the degree to which all of the most dangerous ideas have accumulated on one side of our artificially binary political structure to me what I call the blue team has accumulated all of the dangerous stuff or all of the most dangerous stuff now a political animal would look past the faults of the other side in order to fend off the hazard to Usher The Blue Team out of power and I can’t really do that what we have on the other side is some sort of a complex wild card that has the potential to do a tremendous amount of good it also has the potential to reneg on its commitments to us and to do something something else or to be Tangled in knots uh by those who would have just been ushered out of office so I’m not going to artificially pretty up what I see as taking place under the red banner but this it’s simple for me because the combination of let’s say the Deep State the neocons the woke ideology and the most dangerous corporate influences including Pharma um all of those things accumulating in one place tells you that whatever the Democratic party was it isn’t any longer and that there’s no rescuing it there’s no incremental rescue for a party that has simply taken up every bad idea simultaneously um you mentioned earlier that this is a a nested Russian doll of crises potential dangers what what are the immediate things you’re worried about is this uh nuclear war is it um a real pathogen getting loose it just ravages people what what do we have to survive exactly one of them is you mentioned at the top of the podcast that mutually assured destruction is a remarkable thing to to depend on nonetheless it did work it did create enough sobriety that despite the fact that we had all of these weapons and that we were pointing them at each other and that our systems for detecting you know missiles in flight are fallible and in fact failed many times somehow we never launched them um so that system I would argue was more functional as a younger civilization that had the proper sobriety around the danger of nuclear weapons we are now becoming Reckless and stupid because our civilization is scile and we are playing some sort of belligerent nuclear game in Ukraine against a ferociously armed traditional nuclear enemy I can’t imagine why we would do that it seems to me that we are gambling everything we are gambling Humanity’s future on some plan that has not been shared with us for reasons we can’t understand and my guess is they don’t actually make any sense um so that’s you know that’s a scile person who has Weaponry that should have been taken away from them the way we take cars away from people who can no longer operate them safely so that’s a major threat it’s an increasing threat because we don’t have the uh wisdom and sobriety to manage that danger as far as pathogens go I don’t think we run much risk at all of a pathogen leaping out of nature the idea of a zoonotic pathogen that is simultaneously uh so contagious and so devastating to the body that that it’s a threat to humanity is quite Preposterous but I do believe we have a cryptic weapons program that keeps losing control of pathogens that it has engineered for reasons that have also not been shared with us and that as we saw with covid the remedies are far worse than the disease and that this actually does create a threat so you know the mRNA gene therapy that was delivered as if it were a vaccine has created lots of negative Health consequences didn’t apparently do any good that is detectable and I believe that that’s actually a a defensible statement if you look at the at the evidence it certainly didn’t do any net good but the idea that it did any significant good is uh debatable at best and we are now moving on for reasons that have also never been explained to new versions of this technology we have now replicons in Japan these are self-replicating vaccines being delivered for no discernible purpose being delivered almost just because we can maybe somebody has a nefarious purpose but there’s certainly no positive reason to be delivering some self-replicating and their much more difficult to control version of a gene therapy um and you know here we have whoever decided to do that running a risk for Humanity now if the things behave as the brochure suggests they’re supposed to then the damage will be limited to those people who’ve taken it but there is no reason to think that they’re going to behave in the way that the brochure suggests they are supposed to any more than the original mRNA vaccines did so anyway those kinds of threats the the threats of harm compounded by either wildly naive thinking about biology or malevolent forces that wish to deliver things into populations for their own reasons that’s a significant threat and then lastly I’ll just say we are not paying attention to the hazard posed To Us by the accelerating decrease in our electromagnetic field that is interfacing badly with the 11e solar cycle so the sun poses a risk to us at all times the risk is unacceptable under normal circumstances but the risk is growing uh in large measure because the electromagnetic field of the planet is weakening and this is something it’s nobody’s fault that the electromagnetic field is weakening but it is certainly something we could be doing a lot more uh about in light of the decrease in the electromagnetic field we could be hardening our grid and creating creting a more robust civilization so that if the sun throws something at us that we can’t handle which it will sooner or later um that we don’t go into chaos just by virtue of the fact that we were unprepared yeah um thank you for adding a new nightmare to my list that that was not at all on my radar uh until this very minute so thank you that’s good fun um I had sort of heard off in the background that there was something going on with um the electromagnetic field and that maybe we were in that period where the um North Pole could end up flipping um but did not realize that there were other issues okay uh that’s super powerful uh if I had to say the thing that worries me most and this clearly is simply perspective I in no way shab or form know enough about um some of the other things to say where this falls on a scale but the thing that I worry most about is just tyranny so I look at the direction that the government is heading forget that the government is Downstream of of culture the the direction that culture is headed is this just absolute clamoring for safety over everything safety and simplicity if I really had to pin it down uh just tell me what to do I don’t want to think through these problems I think there’s something about the way that life is getting a lot more complicated um that people have some sort of intrinsic hunger for that safety and secur so that one worries me a lot okay now that that’s out on the table do you have guesses um obviously somebody that organizes a post-political event as you’ve referred to it as rescue the Republic has ideas on what that positive vision is what is the way that we Phoenix this knowing full well these are hypotheses probably more than theories but I would love to hear some of what you’re moving towards and not just what we’re moving away from yeah that’s a good that’s a good question um in evolutionary biology we have a metaphor that we use to think about the transition between niches effectively we call it the Adaptive landscape and we envision opportunities that is to say niches as Peaks and obstacles to getting from a lower Peak to a higher Peak as valleys so you have to cross through an Adaptive Valley to get between most sets of Peaks and the problem one of the problems that threatens civilization is that the skill set for crossing a valley is different than the skill set for ascending a peak so if you think about startup culture there are certain people who are great under startup conditions who are not very well adapted to the mature corporation that arises out of a successful startup you know they need to go do another startup that’s because the skill set’s just not the same one so the problem is that we live in a niche that has been so fantastically productive over so many generations that the hill climbers have effectively killed off the valley crossers right they see them as a threat they see them as counterproductive to climbing the Peaks we now have to cross a valley and we have lost track of how you do it so I’m concerned about that I do think there is something so utterly hopeful about what I’m calling the unity Coalition because it contains all of the all of the folks who have integrity courage and think outside the box so these are the valley crossers and the hill climbers Downstream of the coup that they have staged are struggling to keep people from listening right we are derided as if we are Fringe nutcases and you know I suppose that’s comforting you know because if we’re right about the danger we’re in then this is a perilous moment and there’s nothing that says that we’re going to get out of it but of course that’s true there are no guarantees so question isn’t can you promise me that if we C if we go into that Valley that we’ll get out the other side and it will be better no nobody can promise you that but what I think I can promise you is that if we stay on this peak as it erodes we will perish so we you know it’s a simple Choice it doesn’t mean it’s going to end well but all of the scenarios in which this ends well involve us learning to do something that we don’t yet know how to do and I will tell you as I I think you must have experienced as well that there is something hopeful about interacting with the ragtag fugitive Fleet of quirky insightful idiosyncratic folks who have uh found each other in the unity movement despite significant differences in our belief systems and sometimes even our values so that’s how I think it’s done is I don’t imagine in fact Heather and I wrote into our book the hunter gatherers Guide to the 21st century that you can’t blueprint your way out of a crisis like this you have to prototype your way out or navigate your way out that it’s a process it’s not a plan and what does that process looks like it looks like people who have retained their capacity to think in spite of the very difficult circumstances in which we have to do it those people pooling their insights holding each other’s feet to the fire and proposing uh next steps so that we start moving in the right direction so that you know we are still around 100 years from now okay so that I can Orient myself that’s a really interesting idea that you have to prototype your way out I don’t think you said blueprint but something along those lines you can’t just architect this thing ahead of time and go out and know that it’s going to carry you across uh would you liken this moment to um the founding of the nation or is this something completely different you know I’ve long been a fan of the idea that history doesn’t repeat itself but it Rhymes and this definitely rhymes with the founding of the nation there are also ways in which it is profoundly different the level of technology and more to the point the rate of technological change is simply so staggering that we have to build in light of it um I would say we have also there’s been a process a a natural process C in which humans have as we’ve gotten good at certain things become we’ve forgotten how to do things that we used to know how to do very well the level of self-sufficiency of humans is at an alltime low the degree to which we are simply dep I mean even compared to when you and I were kids the degree to which we are now dependent even those of us who didn’t grow up dependent on a cell phone are now dependent on them because we haven’t polished our skills for keeping track of where we are physically for example we haven’t maintained a set of documents that would allow us to figure it out if the electri city went out so anyway we we are in a state of um of risk that is partly natural technology causes you to become dependent on it as it becomes a feature of your developmental environment and partly unnatural where we’ve uh become we we’ve developed a kind of collective learned helplessness and those are not good things you know to the extent that people used to have jobs in which they interacted with the physical uh laws of the Universe on the regular that was a world in which there was an awful lot of common sense there might not have been as much sense about remote facts of the universe but there was a lot of wisdom amongst people even people who we would say were uneducated because the fact is the world is a very educational place if you are forced to play in it and how we deal with a world full of people who have become uh you said at some point that people were easily manipulated I believe we are artificially easily manipulated now because it’s for people who’s you know if you think about what comes across a modern screen what comes across a modern screen often masquerades as a just a remote capacity to see something you you look at something that looks like a video of some event that happened and sometimes it is and often it’s not and because those two things don’t look different that screen sometimes educates you about things that happen in the world and sometimes it miseducate you and that combination results in a kind of at best a sort of agnosticism about what’s true rather than an intuition that actually says you know what something’s off here and um we are going to have to overcome that by some mechanism I would argue that really the only tool at our disposal is track record that you don’t necessarily know who understands what’s going on based on how they sound right unless they’re in a territory that you know very well somebody can bamboozle you and in fact I would argue that almost everybody educated or not got Bamboozled by the you know the covid criminals because they didn’t have any way of interpreting what they were being told about pathogens about genomes about cells these things were foreign language and so they people were easily suckered but what you can do is you can look back and you can say well it doesn’t matter whether I thought that sounded crazy at the time how did this claim stand up over time and unfortunately the part of our system that is not just demented but is actually actively parasitizing us is working overtime to make sure that we can’t track people’s track record it is obscuring evidence and uh if you wanted to fix one thing first that might be the thing the ability for us just to even know what happened and what we were told that turned out to be true and what we were told that turned out to be false that’s that’s job one from the point of view of navigating intelligently off of this rapidly eroding Peak hopefully to arrive at a better one yes spoken like a true scientist uh like a true entrepreneur this is something that drives me crazy all right uh in this interview uh having gone to rescue the Republic and just some of the people that I know are involved in the unity Coalition um I’ve jotted down here what I think are some of the core values uh that have been driving your thinking uh and then with those and everybody’s working memory unless you think that I’ve gotten something wrong I want to hear what you think the world is going to look like uh whether Trump wins or kamla Harris wins so here’s what I’ve taken away uh the values that would be useful government efficiency talked a lot about that opposing the Deep state so just this connective tissue over time that basically can ignore the elected officials uh focus on health this is something that I took from the rescue the Republic event like coming back to the individual and this is tied into a data feedback loop so we have all these policies around human health have they worked absolutely not they’ve moved us in the aggressive wrong direction and then what you were just saying about track record uh I would call it data feedback loop so when you’re trying to run a company you’re saying hey I have this hypothesis we’re going to turn it into a test we’re going to run that test we’re going to pre- say what we think the outcome is going to be so we know if our prediction engine is working or not and then we’re going to look at the data did we actually get the result that we thought if we were right on great prediction engine is working perfectly if we were over or under we were off obviously we’d rather High perform than underperform but we’re never going to lie to ourselves so we need to update our prediction so now we know what is true and then one thing that we actually haven’t talked a lot about but been sort of in the background of everything you’ve said is Liberty uh you did touch on it very specifically once um earlier in the talk but that that is a huge part certainly for me and I think a a driving ethos of uh rescue the Republic and what you’re trying to put forward I think at one point you even said that’s how you can judge the effectiveness of a system is how many people does it offer um U meaningful Liberty I think is the way that you refer to it I think that’s really really smart Okay uh I see nodding so I’ll assume we’re at least directionally correct so now with that hovering in the air as the thing that we’re steering towards what does the world look like if Trump wins what does the world look like if kamla Harris wins well I’m profoundly concerned about what happens if kamla Harris wins because I think the track record of the blue team kamla Harris’s absolute failure to protect us from a clearly demented president tells us that she’s not really on our team and so I take very seriously her uh statements that suggest she’s interested in uh mandatory gun buybacks censoring people that she doesn’t like what they’re having to say price controls what she calls Equity um all of these things if you extrapolate out are something the Republic can’t take four more years of an incremental move in these directions much less some sort of Step function where uh because we’re now playing in endgame Dynamics this thing is ratcheted up rapidly after the election so I don’t think the uh success of the Harris campaign could be really any more frightening it’s about as bad as it could be having nothing to do with Harris herself being a distinguished creature I don’t think she is I don’t think she’s special but I do think she has partnered with uh a parasitoid that literally Embraces all of the worst ideas simultaneously worst from our perspective as a people as far as what happens if Trump is elected we can hope that Trump is wiser than he was the last time he was elected and that he realizes so a couple things have changed one he’s been through an awful lot in the intervening time he’s been uh hounded with lawfare in the courts he’s been shot at he’s been he’s been through a constant campaign to portray him as things other than he is this may have created a wiser person it could also cause a person to become deranged I don’t see the sign that he’s deranged so I’m hopeful but the other thing that has changed is the unity Coalition is now an entity we now recognize each other and lots of people have accepted the cost of admitting that they are going to vote for Trump or thinking of voting for Trump or open to voting for Trump what that means is that if he wants to Avail himself of it he has this incredibly deep bench of Highly skilled courageous patriotic people that he can put into positions to to figure out how we’re going to prototype and navigate our way out of this culdesac and to somewhere new my greatest hope is that he is elected and that’s what he does does and the fact that he is partnering with Elon Musk with Robert F Kennedy Jr with tulsey gabard suggest that he is of this mindset my greatest fear is that once elected the utility of that partnership may not be as obvious to him and that he could be either LED in a bad direction or might have an instinct to um to jettison those oblig ations and it could be terrible so anyway I’m hoping that the unity movement will understand it something itself as something other than a uh a support Force for Trump the unity movement should support Trump if he is doing things that are in the interest of solving the nation’s long-term problems and it should function to pressure him if he starts moving in some other direction um so that’s where I am to me it’s very very simple because the one side involves so much Peril and the other side is a wild card but the potential for greatness is there and I’m not sure that there’s anything more one needs to know in order to figure out how to how to interact with that what do you say to people that say look January 6 is just completely disqualifying you cannot have a president that Pride an Insurrection on the government you’re you’re begging for the Tyranny that Tom says he’s so worried about well I don’t think it was an Insurrection I think it’s been painted that way at Great cost I think it was a terrible episode but even the details of it you had a large number of people engaged in peaceful protest you had a small number of people engaged in something violent um you have the implic ation of the FBI being involved you have lawfare being wielded against people who weren’t violent in the aftermath so anyway I I don’t think the story is the one we’ve been told that we must believe but I also think we are we have run off the normal tape of History here right even if you believe some some official variant of that story you also have a vice president who according to Seymour Hirsch one of the last great journalists forced the president out of the race on the basis that the 25th Amendment would be used to remove him from office if he did not agree but then did not remove him from Office even as we were playing belligerent nuclear games in Ukraine so even if you believe the standard version of January 6th what you have is people who’ve done completely unacceptable things as the two viable choices in the election and the question is which of these things is more frightening going forward and even there it’s a slam dunk yeah um that to me the fact that he says Trump says that he won the election the fact that he tried tried to get I think electorates uh like fake electorates to say that they were the ones that could certify or not certify um that man that Looms in the air for me and one thing that I also worry about is um at least the people that I’m aware of so many people came forward that worked with him in when he was president saying that it was just a terrible experience that he’s only out for himself and so the thing that um I have deep concerns about is are people like Elon who are obviously very good for the campaign Trail are they going to find themselves two months in three months in just absolutely Driven Crazy uh and saying I you really can’t work with this guy that that’s the fear that I have believe me I have all kinds of fears I also have a good deal of Hope based on a number of people who I now know who know the man personally and do not have this experience so I’m hopeful that he is uh wiser than he was and that he sees that he has a historic opportunity I fear what might unfold but I think we have this incredibly powerful force in the unity movement that simply needs to figure out what happens post election and exert the right kind of pressure If Trump is moving in the direction of rescuing us from uh the Peril that we find ourselves in then the unity movement is an incredible tool that he should be able to utilize to to do that well because no president understands all of the issues that are uh Downstream of their decisionmaking so seeding the right people is obviously the way a great president is going to function on the other hand if he dispenses with you know Elon and Bobby and tulsey and the rest of us then this force is the most useful check you’re going to have because frankly we retain our ability to speak on behalf of frankly not just the American people but the world has such a stake in our election and most people do not have the privilege of being able to uh to say signal their consent or lack thereof so the world is really depending on us to uh to reign in the out ofcontrol forces that have taken over our ferociously powerful system and I I really see the unity movement as well positioned either way what do you make of the way that the political parties have flipped is there um is there a game being played is this just sort of a natural Ean flow um because it seeing Trump in a McDonald’s is just for somebody that was uh you know growing up in the 1980s like that was not the vision of the Republicans Republicans were Gordon Gecko and the Democrats would have been in McDonald’s so what what has happened yeah I actually did a pretty good job I think on the last Darkhorse podcast of describing the Dynamics that led us here so I’ll I’ll do a quick version what I think happened is the Republicans were the corrupt corporate party they effectively represented management and in the world that you and I grew up in the Democratic party represented labor which was not without its corruption labor was a corrupt Force to but roughly speaking the red team was management the blue team was Labor the blue team was powerful because labor always outnumbers management by a huge margin but management has a power Advantage based on the concentration of wealth and these two things were uh battling in our political Landscape Clinton whatever it is that he may have been thinking changed the Democratic party he effectively cut labor loose and made the Democratic party into a second corrupt corporate party which was superficially coherent because the the way that some corporations want the body politic corrupted is in conflict with the way other corporate entities might want it corrupted right do you want a Workforce that you are entitled to make sick with bad drugs or do you want a Workforce that you’re entitled to exploit by virtue of you know uh their ability to generate wealth and be frozen out of the of it those are two competing Corruptions so we had two corrupt parties labor was completely cut a drift anybody who wanted to get out of the corruption racket could have embraced the now politically homeless labor force but it never happened and it was prevented from happening through the wielding of the idea of what I call the Lesser evil Paradox anybody who tries to walk into this two corrupt corporate party system with a party that just simply addresses the needs of average people is accused of electing the greater evil and so nobody survives that accusation okay so you’ve got two corrupt corporate parties labor is unable to find a representative because the first pass the post voting in our system creates a two-party system and if they’ve both import embraced corporate greed there’s nobody to speak for the people and then you get a hugely unusual creature like Donald Trump and what Donald Trump did was he effectively collected a large fraction of this now politically homeless labor movement and he brought them over to the Republican party so he was not a traditional Republican in any way and he’s not an obvious working class hero but because he’s politically Adept in the way that he is he was able to capture this energy that existed in these uh now betrayed uh laborers and to create magga and to bring them over to the Republican party and the Republican party now had a choice which was to accept this and become a powerful political force at a substantial cost to their uh corrupt owners now that of course played out and what’s happening now is that as this uh as the Republican party now becomes a home for this homeless force of Labor um it is driving all of the concentrated corruption and which is no longer just corporate right this now does involve the Deep State and the neocons and these are not inherently corporate Corruptions these are other kinds of Corruptions but it’s driving all of those things onto the one team so you now have you know Dick Cheney embracing the Democrats signaling that this is really a a pole flip in the political landscape and now the question is will the Republicans Embrace their new role as a populist party and you know jettison the last of their corporate corruptors which would make the transition complete I would also point out though the final thing here is that originally when magga uh was captured and named and brought over to the Republican Party by Donald Trump it was largely a white movement it is now because of various forces increasingly picking up a wide diversity of people and it’s welcoming to them so um you what I’m really describing is that there are game theoretic Dynamics in our system which will actually through relatively natural processes including corruption cause this inversion of the parties and it’s not the first time that we’ve seen it I mean don’t forget the Republican party was uh born under Abraham Lincoln in a fight against slavery right so the party that fought slavery uh was dragging its heels during the Civil Rights Movement you know Party inversions happen and this is this is uh we’re watching it happen in real Time by a mechanism that I think is surprising but uh relatively straightforward all right great explanation knowing that we’re about to go through this um adaptive Valley what is your pest um I know you’re apolitical so I won’t say argument but what’s your pithiest uh appeal for people to vote in a way that will see us through this adaptive valy yeah um well I think they’ve done us a favor by making this simple Dick Cheney is Nature’s way of telling us that that’s not the Democratic party we remember and the diversity in every meaningful way of what’s taking place under the red banner does not tell us that the the Republican party is going to become something honorable but at least it opens the possibility of our moving forward in some way that is consistent with our um open Embrace of people across all sorts of democrat demographic lines so the concentrated evil on the one side makes the uncertainties on the other side unimportant we should move forward in the One Direction that can be def defended and then we should do everything in our power to make sure that it behaves as well uh as it can um we should be realistic we can’t hold it to standards that it can’t meet but we should we should offer our help and we should pressure it to move in a direction that actually matches the values that all reasonable people actually share which was really part of the message of rescue the Republic was that when you get right down to it we’re told we can’t get along with each other but the amount that we agree on so completely dwar the part we disagree on that um it makes things simpler than we are allowed to to understand all right at the rescue the Republic event you talked about the um need to Phoenix out of this and you made a pretty um interesting parallel to what happens to organisms as they age they collect all this damage which I think we would like into the deep State whatever is driving the neocon thinking of just Wars everywhere same with woke ideology corporate influence all that you can look at those as um damage to the DNA structure of the organism that is the state uh but the way that humans have solved it is not the way that the state is going to be able to solve it so if you don’t mind walk us through how does a biological organism deal with all of these assaults and what can we learn from that and what is the path out when you’re talking about a state sure let me just say say um I’m speaking for myself as I was at rescue the Republic um rescue the Republic is a non-political entity um it serves an educational purpose and it gathers what I’ve called the unity movement which are people who are essentially post-political and non-ideological and recognize a hazard that is posed to civilization so anyway I don’t want people to conflate what is clearly um a political Dimension to what I’m saying with with rescue the Republic but I’m going to offer one correction which I will return to after I’ve answered the question you’ve asked me I don’t believe that the Deep State and Pharma corruption are a reflection of syence I believe they are a consequence of the syence of our civilization so let me outline why our why civilization siness in the same sense that a biological organism does and then I’ll make the case for what has happened that has brought in all of these factors that what I’m saying are all the all the worst ideas accumulated in one place so the story of why creatures grow feeble and inefficient with age most people would say why we age I would say why we sesse which is more than a fact of time simply passing it’s a question of us biologically degrading as we are all familiar with that’s a process that starts not at Birth but it starts at the usual age of first reproduction for a species so basically sexual maturity is the moment at which syence begins which is in in and of itself an indicator of what is driving in this process the theory which is as close as we ever get in science to a fact the theory that explains why creatures like us sesse and why certain other creatures either don’t sesse or sesse in a different way is something written by somebody I had the privilege of knowing a guy named George C Williams who was one of the great 20th century evolutionary biologists and his hypothesis that he offered in 1947 was something called antagonistic pliot tropy and what it said was that it was building on uh a an earlier piece of work by a guy named Peter Meir a British biologist Nobel Prize winner the guy who discovered the evolutionary and physiological reason that we reject a graft from somebody who had has the same blood type if you you know uh put somebody else’s tissue into your body your immune system rejects it because the compatibility goes well beyond blood type anyway so Peter Meir um made an argument that natural selection sees what happens to us in early life with much greater Clarity than it sees what happens in late life and the reason for that according to Meir was that lots of stuff that happens to you late in life that might be a consequence of a genetic vulnerability happens to so few individuals that there’s not a mechanism for selection to see it very well um and most reproduction is done by the time selection has any opportunity to see it at all so something that has a profound impact on your health in your 90s actually most people don’t live to their ’90s so it’s very cheap in evolutionary terms what GE Williams added to that was he said look that may well explain the process that happens at the very end of life when selection becomes very weak in its ability to see these defects it does not explain why we have measurable syence early in our reproductive lives in fact beginning at the dawn of our reproductive lives his argument was that the human body or any animal body is a terrifically complex entity that is set in motion by a genome that is much less complex in fact you can argue that the genome at the informational level is really complicated it’s not complex what that means is that in order for a genome that has let’s say 20,000 active genes Each of which has an average of five different edits so 100,000 genes that set in motion a human that as an adult will have some 30 trillion cells that is self assembling self-repairing and maintaining that that requires that small number of genes to do multiple things and we know this is true genes do multiple things in fact even saying that the average Gene has five different edits is an indicator that genes are all doing multiple jobs when you have something like a gene that does multiple jobs it will often be the case that a gene will do something that’s beneficial early and will have a harm late and Williams point was anytime that happens the tendency is for selection to view the early life benefit very positively and to look past the late life cost so we ought to accumulate these genes that do two things that’s a pliot tropy and we ought to then have the benefit of all of the early life features of these genes when we are young and the cost ought to be the degradation of our capacity to maintain and protect ourselves as we grow older so when I started studying uh in graduate school it was well known that this hypothesis that Williams had offered was true we could tell that because many of the predictions that that that hypothesis made had been tested in the wild but nobody knew of any genes that matched his description which was a curious fact I in graduate school happened on something that met all of the criteria and seemed to explain a lot it wasn’t exactly a gene but it was good enough it met Williams in 1947 didn’t know enough about the way the genome worked because our understanding of the genome was crude at the time he didn’t draw his hypothesis as broadly as he might but once you sort of fixed it for a modern understanding of the way information is stored in the genome uh it became clear to me that there was a system that would explain in terms that fit Williams hypothesis exactly this pattern across tissue after tissue so I won’t delay us there but that system is one that protects us from tumors when we’re young and uh at the risk of getting myself in hot water here tumors have traditionally been very rare in youth they’ve become much more common as a result of various distortions that we have introduced into our environment but the the traditional pattern The evolutionary pattern is that you should have essentially no risk from tumors except in a couple of unusual tissues you know until your 50s or 60s you know at which point the pattern starts to accelerate but um the cost of protecting ourselves from tumors is a an absolute limit on the number of times that most cells can replace themselves and therefore the maintenance that we do of the body all right now I’ve dragged you into a very um a fairly detailed explanation of why creatures sesse and why in the case of something like a mammal a human um this has to do with the protection against tumors the argument I made at rescue the Republic was that civilizations have the identical selective defect as the one that makes creatures evolve so they grow feeble and inefficient with age and that is a bias towards shortterm solution making irrespective of the delayed cost so if you think about what a politician um what they are uh rewarded for doing they are rewarded for doing things that cause people to think that their life has been enhanced and by the time you know if if we do something if we make some expenditure and it makes people’s life better but it’s unsustainable then when the late life cost is due a people may not even connect it to the change that brought about that late life cost and B the politician is long since out of office so they are not penalized so politicians are rewarded for finding these short-term solutions that cause people to think that they’re being well governed but the consequence is that our system has accumulated all of these hazards with a delayed effect and my claim is uh civilizations will do this our civilization is especially prone to it because of the democratic features of our system and the market-based features of our system the market tends to reward things that are profitable in the short term and so both of these things have caused the accumulation of all of these characteristics that have now made our civilization utterly fragile it literally is demented we are doing Preposterous things that don’t make any sense are virtually impossible to defend in any sort of logical terms and we can’t stop ourselves just like you know an old person maybe can’t stop themselves from falling down the stairs all right we all know what what sence looks like as somebody gets old just because we’ve been around it what are the characteristics that you see right now that are these accumulated tumors or whatever word you want to use um I would say two are obvious we could probably find a dozen more if we went looking but the two that are obvious are a complete failure of the immunities of our system and that is what I was going to argue all of the stuff that’s accumulated over under the the blue Banner in our election that looks to me like a collapse of our resistance to what most people would think of as parasites I would be tempted to call them parasitoids parasitoid is a parasite that kills you um and so what we have is the concentration of all of these betrayals of our long-term well-being under one Banner not because those things are themselves the product of inessence but because our vulnerability to them has allowed them you know to to come through the door or um the other thing is a kind of literal dementia you know one thing I’m sure you will have noticed is just that in talking to people you know good-hearted intelligent people trying to think about where we are in history everybody is confused the systems that are supposed to allow us to process just simple information about where we are what it implies and what we might do differently that would increase our chances of being around 500 years from now those conversations have become increasingly meaningless as every system that you would use to perceive the world or to process the information is collapsing so we’re all confused even those of us who are spending almost every waking hour trying to understand where we are are having to contemplate uh a huge range of possibilities just because our uh our stream of evidence is increasingly noisy all right when I try to break this down I often will think in terms of the um the Constitutional Amendments what they were trying to protect against so in this I’m hearing so you’re you didn’t use the word sensemaking apparatus but there’s this thing that we normally rely on people to be able to come out debate ideas say this this is what I think is happening no you’re out of your mind this is what’s happening uh that that’s being clamped down on so you have a degradation of the First Amendment for sure um do you think that the distortions that we see actually map to amendments is that an overly simplistic way to look at it can we begin like sort of going through that and saying okay this is how we’re breaking uh this immune response number one this is how we break immune response number two or is it more nebulous than that um I tend to think of it in terms of a an evolutionary novelty problem so the founders wrote a document and they wrote their reasoning into other auxiliary documents and I have a hard time imagining that they could have done better given what they understood about where they were in history and what they were but the these were people these are pre- darwinian people they did not understand evolutionary Dynamics and therefore couldn’t take the concept of evolution that applies to creatures and species and understand that there was an analogy to civilizations and that they needed to be mindful of evolutionary dynamics that would create challenges that they could not Envision so they were aware of technological change obviously but they were not aware of evolutionary Dynamics and that means that given what they knew they did wonderfully I think they nailed the values uh as well as could be hoped but the structures were of course going to run into profound challenges just based on the fact that the threats that that the founders perceived uh are no longer recognizably like the ones that we face so degree to which government was the greatest threat to the free exchange of ideas is just it’s not true anymore we now have these quasi governmental um monopolistic forces that are in a position to technically allow you to speak and prevent anybody from hearing you of these things or just simp L not well addressed by a First Amendment that is focused on governmental threats to speech so I think they nailed the values it is not surprising it should not surprise us that the document is does not anticipate modern increasingly technological threats to civil liberties they of course didn’t complete the job at the time you know they left slavery intact in order to get the the colonies to to Confederate um so what we are left with is how do we recover their vision of a world in which we are freed from constraints to innovate to be productive to partner um how do we rescue that from the increasingly archaic understanding of the threats to Liberty uh that we can now see in the present so I’m a big fan of the Constitution given When It Was Written I’m not a huge fan of the idea hey let’s open it up and have a constitutional convention because I worry that we could make things worse very easily but I also don’t believe the Constitution is up to the challenge at the moment absent uh a Visionary um set of interpreters of that document which we’re not going to get in a political environment like the one we have all right let me give you a a slightly alternate take I agree with you I think literally up until you say government is not the biggest threat anymore uh you paint a very compelling picture of what’s really happening which is the corporations are coming in they’re creating these incedible technical tools that become the Public Square they themselves are now creating the inability for people to speak but I think even that is an echo of the fundamental problem which is that the government does become the way in which the uh parasite Begins overtaking the organism and if we were to actually go back and look at the founding documents in there are all of the answers so you have a government founded on the idea that governments tend towards the ter rical and so you have to put in all of these things in place of that now to your point about the way that systems evolve there’s no way that they could have predicted the weight in which the um tyranny was going to evolve and so what ends up happening what I see when I look out at the world today is you have this marriage of a government that is just absolutely mind-bendingly obsessed with uh size power control as an organism will want to do and just to keep the biological metaphors anybody understands how tumors work they do all kinds of things to hide from the immune system to make sure that they get the blood supply that the nutrients are going to them and so they I I’ll just be very blunt I think that’s where the government has gotten to it’s just drawing in all of the resources it wants to grow uh it’s putting out jobs reports that hey everybody jobs are amazing and yet more than 50% I think it might be more than 70% of the jobs created in the most recent job report were governmental jobs so you have a a what could be a thriving bit of tissue that has become cancerous in the sense it does not know when to stop replicating and so it is just sucking in resources and trying to bamboozle people uh in in the sense of hey vote for me you want a bigger government we’re going to take care of more things for you and it’s going to be wonderful okay so that’s the tumor Playbook and then what you have is corporations that go ooh this is actually really advantageous to me through something called regulatory capture so I what I want to do as the growing um Corporation is yeah go ahead and come to me back Channel tell me to silence certain people and I will do that because and I doubt that all of this is said out loud but there becomes this sort of quiet um quid proquo of I’m going to do that for you and what I need is for you to help me create this moat around me that makes it hard for incumbents to come in because when I look at uh the ways to solve these problems like when I see the increased rhetoric around uh greedy corporations are gouging you and we’re going to have to deal with that in order to get the prices down at the grocery store I I will just tell you right now if you start relieving regulations you will get new companies that will enter the space and the best way to innovate is price and speed and so if you can do something cheaper or faster or ideally both you will absolutely clobber the incumbents but the incumbents are using the tumorous government in order to help them protect against that sort of flourishing thing so to me it still all comes down to if you go back to the founding documents and you see their absolute fear of that getting too big too tyrannical that if you go back to that idea and say how do we start reducing the size of government how do we start relieving some of the regulatory burdens so that we can save the ultimate patient which is the average person uh it’s a great analysis I think we have to bring these two things together because I think you’re seeing something with great clarity and it might be obscuring something else so the distinction between a tumor and a parasite or by my argument a parasitoid is that a tumor in general mind you 20 years from now now I believe we will find that this story is less true than the way I’m going to tell it but in general We Believe tumors are a failure of Regulation a tumor dies with the patient most of them do not have a way of transmitting anything to someone else so the genes inside the tumor actually have an interest in the tumor being rained in and sometimes that fails for reasons we could go into if we wanted but the point is the tumor is not doing its own bidding because there’s some reason for it to do that a parasite or a parasitoid is a parasite has reasons it is its own evolutionary entity and it has interests that are contrary to that of the host in the case of most parasites they have to walk a delicate balance because a parasite that kills the host often dies with it so most parasites steal but they have an interest in minimizing the harm to keep the creature that they’re parasitizing profitable a parasitoid has evolved a different life cycle where it can actually survive on its own in one way or another and the key to seeing that so I’m not arguing that we don’t have that phenomenon that you’re talking about where government starts growing of its own accord even though it’s bad for the body politic that does happen and in fact it’s a natural part of Institutions and Elon Musk demonstrated that it had happened inside of X and anybody who’s been paying attention to Tech circles knows that it’s happened inside of all of the tech Giants that there’s a huge number of people who are not positively contributing and it’s a cryptic you know welfare PR program at some level there are lots of people who can go and it doesn’t damage the organism at all in fact it makes it more efficient but the what I’ve increasingly begun to focus on are the entities that are not even in principle under the control of the governmental apparatus so I draw a distinction between out of control and entities some Department that has taken on a life of its own and started uh governing based on internal beliefs without respect to the consent of the Govern that obviously happens but there’s no functional part of the government as described by our founding documents for which you cannot turn off the budget what has happened happened is that many things have now innovated a mechanism to fuel themselves they have created black budgets that are not under anyone’s control uh and they’ve done this in many different ways you know we have the Deep State itself which has the ability to generate money in various different ways it can either drain money out of the treasury through through mechanisms that do not show up under the correct line item or it can generate Resources by committing crimes that are easier to commit if you’re part of the intelligence apparatus than if you’re outside of it or by having Superior information on historical events and using that to transfer wealth in the market these mechanisms mean that there is no uh control that one could exert from inside of government to turn off the deep State this is the thing that makes the Deep State different we have to figure out what to do about that it’s not envisioned in the Constitution and it’s just simply a new kind of challenge now the last thing I’ll say here is that when I first started thinking about the necessary relationship between the ability to fuel operations outside of governmental budgets and what we call the Deep state it was narrow and then I started to realize that there were lots of governmental structures and quasi governmental structures that have parallel uh mechanisms operating in and around them so for example discovering that the FDA is in large measure fueled by private money right where Fara is in fact delivering a huge fraction of the resource that makes the entity run this may have the same implication even though it functions very differently than for example the CIA trafficking drugs into the us because it has licensed to commit crimes in the course of doing business yeah uh you have your finger on very real things but when I step back and go um okay we there are multiple problems happening inside the body just to um keep with one metaphor here uh and I think now it becomes a question of what what is going to end up killing you so I’ve heard you make a really um compelling argument that part of the reason that uh the MRNA um protocol technology what ever you want to refer to it as is so dangerous is there are parts of the body that it can get into namely the heart where it’s now going to take you down but if it got into the liver or the deltoid tissue it’s less of a problem and so I want to focus in on the liver and the heart for a second uh because this gets to I think the difference even though you and I both think the patient is very sick um I’m going to make the case that you’re focused on the liver and I’m focused on the heart uh so what I think is happening if you just want to sum up the derangement and what you would have to do to unwind all of this it is very simply speaking to this idea of a black budget I’m not saying that’s not a problem but I am saying it is absolutely dwarfed by the thing that they do in plain sight which is they print money so they rack up all this extraordinary debt which is why um the agencies can just keep getting larger and larger to your point about there’s no way to turn off that spet the reason is they’ve actually convinced the public that you can print money forever and the thing that I’m watching is yes the heart can absorb some damage but it’s not the liver which will actually regenerate itself the heart is very different and when you start messing with the currency this is what happens the reason they print money is because they don’t have to get the govern’s consent it is a way around that whole idea of the consent of the Govern so uh they can spend money on anything and they don’t have to ask you for it because they’re just going to print additional money and people do not understand that as they print money it’s robbing you of your buying power so they are quite literally stealing from you even though you have this same amount of money in the bank so if I’m the government and I have this impulse to grow and get bigger and I have a mechanism by which I can steal in two ways and this is another thing that people do not fully understand way number one is I just print the money we talked about that way number two is technology is a deflationary thing so as things are deflating in cost I as the person printing the money no there won’t be a onetoone relationship between the amount that I inflate the currency and inflation so hey you’re if you were really able to run the math between how much has technology lowered the cost so that my cost compared to 1965 should be lower not higher and in reality they’re obscenely higher that Delta is what the government has been able to capture through money Printing and so I look at that and I go there’s no way back from that this this is a oneway thing now the part that I can’t wrap my head around and coming back to what you we’re saying it rescue the Republic is this idea of how do we re Phoenix out of this because history tells us that the way that you re Phoenix out of this is you go to war a whole bunch of people die it is so painful for everyone involved that typically uh you lose your status as a reserve currency so you don’t even have to have this hyperinflate away you just lose your status as a reserve currency you’re so tired of fighting you just upend everybody’s debts you do a debt Jubilee and now the people that were owed money or no longer owed anything which is devastating in its own right and the people that owed people money that goes away which is hey it’s a big win but everybody’s just too tired too depleted to fight it but that is such a gnarly way where you literally it’s like the the old version of the country dies and usually something lesser than steps out of that and sort of transmits the power and you could say at this point that the parasite moves from that host which it was perfectly happy to let die and then because it’s an idea pathogen it moves over to a new country that looks like we did in the 1940s and the cycle begins again but it’s always a cycle of debt and that’s the part that people just other than Ray alio who’s screaming at the top of his lungs uh people just do not seem to queue in on okay but you get it I get it now slowly took me a lot of years to get here all right but you’re you’re one guy working on uh presumably not privileged information so you’re able to get there I’m able to get there I know lots of people who’ve gotten there do you think the people who are running this system don’t see this I think it is a mixture of truly Sinister people who understand it and do it and people that they really don’t understand it they they actually don’t have the intellectual capability to wrap their head around it yeah I agree I agree actually that both of those things are true but all I need for my point is that there is a collection of people in a position to effectively make policy who do understand that this is a fatal trajectory so my point is that’s the parasitoid not the cancer and maybe the way to think about this is there are Cancers that are contagious the thing I alluded to earlier is that my guess is we going to discover there are more of them than we knew um but we do have examples of these things for example the the cancer that is killing Tasmanian devils in uh in Australia uh is a contagious cancer that they get from each other when they battle so what you’ve got is a decent model for something governmental and inept in which many of the people who are participating and it do not understand that they are actually killing the goose that lays the Gord golden eggs but there’s also an element that does understand very well what it’s doing right that it is acting in a strategic way and that it will escape the dying body that’s where I believe we are so I’m not disagreeing about the existence of tumorlike processes in the story I’m saying there’s another element which is something that does not care that it is killing the thing on which you and I and our families and friends are all depending and so that’s why I’m focused there I both problems are potentially fatal in their own right the argument I made at rescue the Republic was that nature for creatures like us that do have this profound pattern of sin Essence has come up with a beautifully elegant solution that we do not understand intuitively but nonetheless it is essentially a perfect solution and that we do not have access to it with civilizations that we would have had to build a different mechanism in so that at the point that a civilization becomes decrepit that there is a mechanism for it to give birth to a civilization that profits from the wisdom that has accumulated and jettisons that which is no longer relevant or turned out not to be true and creates a civilization you know effective a process of the creation of new civilizations that become better over time the way selection makes creatures better adapted to their environments over time so the solution for creatures is let’s do it for humans the solution is kids and the thing about kids and you don’t need to have kids of your own for this solution to work but we humans are unique in the degree to which what is adaptive about us is not housed in our genomes we have genomes full of adaptations but the genome has offloaded the heavy lifting of evolution to our cognitive layer and our cultural layer and so much of what it is to be a human is actually passed outside of the genome from parent to offspring sometimes passed horizontally across civilization those elements are much more evolutionarily capable than the underlying genome because they evolve faster and so this is what accounts for human beings having evolved to do so many different things on earth over our history and across space and the way it works is you produce a child that child is not a blank slate but they’re the blankest Slate that nature has ever created and they pick up that fraction of what you know that is still apparently highly relevant and they jettison that fraction that is not and so they become a version of you that is updated either because they live in different circumstances than you did or because time has progressed so what we have is a creature that can keep up with a rapidly changing environment um because we don’t have that process in civilizations we are facing in essence without having produced any offspring that might do what we’re doing better than we’re doing it you know in light of modern technology and so the argument that I was making was that we have to figure out an alternative to civilizations giving birth to each other in some sort of regular way and my claim was that very often wisdom about subtle phenomena is captured and transmitted culturally in in the form of myths and the myth that I invoked was the Phoenix which is a bird that instead of reproducing Rises From the Ashes of its own nest and that we have to do something like this for our civilization to survive for it to be effectively reborn not as a uh a child but as a a new bird so that that I think is where we are how you do that is a difficult question I think we have to survive the immediate Peril in order to create a process that does this um but nonetheless that was my argument all right everybody if you haven’t already be sure to subscribe and until next time my friends be legendary take care peace if you like this conversation check out this episode to learn more this is what I would hope would happen I would hope that you would consider that there are these core foundational ideas that make our country the coolest country on the planet um in so far as in the United States you can I think you can be the best

Truly Right View: Advocating for Free Speech in the Age of Political Censorship

Introduction: What is Free Speech Today?

In a world where political discourse is dominated by big tech, cable news, and social media influencers, free speech is constantly under threat. From censorship of conservative viewpoints to the silencing of dissent on controversial issues, we are witnessing an alarming trend of restrictions on the most fundamental rights of any citizen in our Constitutional Republic: the right to speak freely.

But what does free speech truly mean in today’s context? Are we protecting it, or are we allowing authoritarian ideologies like socialism, communism, fascism, and dictatorships to erode it?

The Constitutional Perspective: Why Free Speech is Non-Negotiable

The First Amendment of the United States Constitution is crystal clear: “Congress shall make no law… abridging the freedom of speech.” The Founding Fathers understood the importance of free speech in preserving a free society. Without it, the ability to challenge government, expose corruption, and advocate for truth would be crushed.

Yet today, under the guise of protecting people from “misinformation” and “hate speech,” powerful institutions are curbing our ability to express ideas that do not conform to their narratives.

Do we not see this as a slippery slope toward authoritarianism?

Shouldn’t we, as citizens, be the ones who decide what we can or cannot hear, not a centralized body or corporation?

Social Media and Cable News: Platforms or Gatekeepers?

Social media was once hailed as the bastion of free speech. It allowed ordinary individuals to share their thoughts, advocate for causes, and hold the powerful accountable. However, over the years, major platforms like Twitter (now X), Facebook, and YouTube have become gatekeepers rather than facilitators of free expression.

Algorithms favor certain ideologies, while alternative viewpoints—especially those with a more conservative or constitutional slant—are shadow-banned, demonetized, or outright censored.

Does this not resemble the tactics of monarchies, communistic or fascist regimes that control what their citizens can see and hear?

Shouldn’t a true democracy allow the free flow of ideas, even if those ideas challenge the status quo?

Social Media Influencers: Fighters for Freedom or Puppets of Censorship?

Many social media influencers, especially those aligned with constitutional values, have become modern-day warriors for free speech. Yet, they face intense backlash, censorship, and de-platforming for voicing opinions that challenge globalist or left-leaning narratives.

How many times have we seen influential voices banned simply for questioning government policies, election results, or health mandates?

Isn’t it concerning that only a select group of elites can decide what is “acceptable” discourse?

While some influencers fall in line with these restrictive policies, others have emerged as champions for free speech, using their platforms to resist censorship and uphold constitutional rights. The question is: Will we support these voices, or will we allow them to be drowned out by corporate and governmental censorship?

The Dangers of Socialism, Communism, and Fascism: A Threat to Free Speech

At the heart of socialism, communism, and fascism lies a common tactic—control over speech. These ideologies have historically sought to suppress dissent, limit expression, and create a monolithic narrative that favors those in power.

Look no further than authoritarian regimes past and present, where dissenters are imprisoned, media is state-controlled, and free speech is criminalized. Can we really ignore the striking similarities between these oppressive ideologies and the current state of political discourse in America?

Is the suppression of speech today not a precursor to more draconian measures tomorrow?

Should we not fight to preserve the right to freely express political, social, and economic ideas?

The Truly Right View: Defending Freedom in the Digital Age

At Truly Right View, we believe in the unwavering defense of free speech as enshrined in the U.S. Constitution. We reject the encroaching influences of socialism, communism, fascism, and any form of dictatorship that seeks to undermine this fundamental right.

Our platform is dedicated to bringing you uncensored news, analysis, and commentary from a truly constitutional perspective. We provide a space where voices that have been silenced or marginalized can be heard, and where you—the citizen—can engage in the free exchange of ideas.

Join the Fight: Sign Up for Our Channel and Newsletter

Do you value free speech?

Do you believe that the right to express your thoughts, opinions, and beliefs should never be compromised, no matter how controversial they may be?

If so, we invite you to join the fight for free speech by subscribing to the Truly Right View channel and newsletter. Stay informed on the latest developments in free speech advocacy, political commentary, and constitutional rights. Together, we can stand against the creeping influence of censorship and authoritarianism.

Why wait for others to defend your rights?

Become part of a movement that fights for the truly free society envisioned by our Founding Fathers.

Will You Speak Up or Stay Silent?

In the end, the future of free speech rests in our hands. We can either stand idly by as it is eroded by corporate and governmental overreach, or we can take action to protect and preserve it.

Will you speak up for your rights, or will you allow them to be taken away piece by piece?

The choice is yours.

Subscribe to the channel for Truly Right View today, and support our patriots shop together, let’s ensure that free speech remains the bedrock of our Constitutional Republic.