How Bankers Triggered World War II to Collect WWI Debts

Truly Right View Video Transcript

Freedom
Let The Truth Be Told!

Are you ready to hear the real truth unfiltered by bias media or government intervention?
Subscribe to the Truly Right View YouTube Channel
Subscribe to the Truly Right View Rumble Channel

What if everything you learned about World War II missed the most important part of the story? Most people think it started when Hitler invaded Poland in September 1939. But that’s like saying the Titanic sank because it hit ice. Sure, that’s what happened on the surface. But what if the real cause was something completely different? A debt crisis left over from World War I that banks needed to collect on. What if I told you that Hitler’s rise to power was financially engineered by the same American banks that had profited from the First World War? What if the invasion of Poland was just the trigger for a debt collection operation that had been 20 years in the making? Let me show you how unpaid World War I debts turned Hitler from a failed artist into a weapon for international creditors. And how the most devastating conflict in human history was actually the world’s largest debt consolidation program disguised as ideology and conquest. The story begins not in 1939, but in 1919 at the Palace of Versailles, where the treaty ending World War I established a financial time bomb that made World War II mathematically inevitable. On June 28th, 1919, German representatives signed the Treaty of Versailles in the Hall of Mirrors. History books focus on the territorial losses and military restrictions. But the real weapon pointed at Germany was article 231, the war guilt clause that made Germany responsible for all war damages and established the legal framework for reparations that would bankrupt the nation. The final reparations bill came to 132 billion gold marks, equivalent to roughly $400 billion in today’s money. This wasn’t just punishment. This was the creation of a permanent debt extraction mechanism. But here’s what most people don’t understand about the Versailles reparations. Germany wasn’t actually expected to pay this amount from its own resources. The entire system was designed from the beginning as a circular debt arrangement managed by American banks. Germany would borrow money from American financial institutions to make reparations payments to Britain and France. Britain and France would then use those reparation payments to pay their war debts to the United States. American banks were essentially lending Germany money that would flow through Europe and return to American creditors with interest added at each stage. The Daw plan of 1924 made this arrangement official. Named after American banker Charles Daws, the plan restructured German reparations and provided for massive American loans to Germany to stabilize its economy. JP Morgan and company led a consortium that loaned Germany 800 million gold marks in the initial phase. But here’s the genius of this arrangement from a banking perspective. The loans came with strings attached. American financial advisers would supervise German government spending and tax collection. The Reichkes Bank, Germany’s central bank, came under partial foreign control. German railways, industrial assets, and customs revenues were pledged as collateral for these loans. Think about what this meant in practical terms. A sovereign nation that had just fought a world war found itself operating under financial receiverhip to the same banks that had funded its enemies. German citizens worked and paid taxes, but a significant portion of that revenue was automatically transferred to American creditors before the German government could use it for domestic purposes. This wasn’t unique to Germany. It was the same system that had been imposed on the Ottoman Empire in 1875, except this time it was being applied to a major industrial power in the heart of Europe. The Young Plan of 1929 extended and restructured this arrangement again, reducing the total reparations amount, but extending the payment period to 1988, 59 years of payments. Think about that. Children born in 1929 would spend their entire working lives paying for a war that ended before they were born. But the Young Plan also created something new and ominous. The Bank for International Settlements established in Basil, Switzerland in 1930, ostensibly to manage these international debt flows. The BIS became the central bank for central banks, the institution where German reparation payments would be processed and distributed to creditor nations. Between 1924 and 1930, American investors loaned Germany 27 billion marks. While Germany paid 19 billion marks in reparations, Germany was borrowing more than it was paying out, but that wasn’t the point. The point was establishing the legal and institutional framework for permanent financial control. As long as the loans kept flowing and the reparations kept getting paid, the system worked. The problem was what would happen if the loans stopped? And in 1929, they did. When the American stock market crashed in October 1929, the flow of American loans to Germany dried up almost overnight. Remember, the entire reparation system depended on American banks lending Germany money to make payments. When those loans stopped, Germany couldn’t pay reparations. When Germany couldn’t pay reparations, Britain and France couldn’t pay their debts to America. The circular debt machine had stopped and everyone was exposed. For Germany, the result was economic catastrophe. Unemployment exploded from 1.3 million in 1929 to over 6 million by 1932. Industrial production collapsed. The banking system teetered on the edge of total failure. The Vimar government, already unpopular because of the reparations burden, became associated with economic disaster in the minds of ordinary Germans. This wasn’t accidental. The debt structure created at Versailles had made Germany vulnerable to exactly this kind of external shock. When American credit dried up, the German economy had no cushion, no way to absorb the impact. But here’s what’s crucial to understand. While ordinary Germans suffered through the depression, American and British banks that held German debt were facing their own crisis. They’d loaned billions to German corporations, German banks, and the German government. If Germany completely collapsed, those loans would default, creating massive losses for institutions that were already struggling from the 1929 crash. The banks needed Germany stable enough to keep making payments, but not so stable that it could challenge the debt arrangements or refuse to pay. This is where Adolf Hitler enters the story. In 1930, the Nazi party was a marginal political movement. By 1933, Hitler was chancellor of Germany. How does a fringe extremist party take control of a major industrial nation in just 3 years? The usual explanation focuses on Hitler’s charisma, German resentment of Versailles, and the economic crisis creating desperation. All of that is true, but it misses the financial mechanism that enabled Hitler’s rise and the banking interests that benefited from it. Starting in 1930, German industrial corporations began funding the Nazi party in substantial amounts. These weren’t isolated donations. This was systematic financial support from major companies including IG Farbin, the chemical giant, Crup, the steel and armaments manufacturer, and Tyson, the coal and steel baron. But here’s the key question. Where were these German corporations getting the money to fund political parties during an economic depression? They were getting it from American loans and investments that continued flowing to specific sectors even while general lending dried up. The Bank for International Settlements, created in 1930 to manage reparations, became a channel for continued financial flows to Germany even during the worst of the depression. The BIS operated above national laws. Its transactions weren’t subject to government oversight. Its meetings were secret, and its board included representatives from the German Reichkes Bank, the Bank of England, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, and major European central banks. The BIS could move money in ways that were aren’t visible to the public or even to most government officials. When Hitler became chancellor in January 1933, you might expect American banks to cut off credit to Germany. The opposite happened. American investment in Germany increased dramatically between 1933 and 1939. Why would American financial institutions lend money to the Nazi regime? The answer is cold financial calculation. Hitler promised to restore order, suppress labor unions, and most importantly, honor Germany’s international debts. For American creditors, Hitler was a better option than a potentially communist Germany or a collapsed Germany that couldn’t pay anything. The scale of American corporate involvement with Nazi Germany is staggering when you look at the actual records. IBM through its German subsidiary Dehumog provided the punch card technology that enabled the Nazis to conduct the census operations and organizational systems used in the Holocaust. IBM President Thomas Watson received the merit cross of the German eagle from Hitler in 1937 and maintained business relationships with the Nazi government throughout the 1930s. General Motors through its German subsidiary Opel became an integral part of Nazi military rearmament. By 1938, Opel was producing trucks for the Vermacht. Ford Motor Company’s German operations similarly toolled up for military production. Standard Oil controlled by the Rockefeller family, maintained extensive business relationships with IG Farbin, the German chemical conglomerate that produced Zyclon Bas used in concentration camps. Standard Oil shared patents for synthetic rubber and synthetic fuel with IG Farbin, technology that would prove crucial for Germany ability to wage war despite limited access to natural rubber and petroleum. These business relationships weren’t incidental to Nazi rearmament. They were essential to it. Germany’s industrial base had been devastated by World War I and the depression. The rapid rebuild of German military capacity between 1933 and 1939 required capital, technology, and industrial equipment that came substantially from American corporations. But the really explosive evidence comes from the banking sector. Prescott Bush, father of President George HW Bush and grandfather of President George W. Bush was a director and partner at Brown Brothers Heramman which had extensive financial relationships with German industrial companies including Fritz Tyson one of Hitler’s earliest and most important financial backers. Union Banking Corporation where Bush was a director had its assets seized by the US government in 1942 under the Trading with the Enemy Act because of its connections to Nazi financiers. These weren’t minor business dealings. These were fundamental financial relationships that enabled the Nazi war machine. Chase Bank, JP Morgan’s commercial banking arm, continued operating its Paris branch after Germany occupied France. Chase Paris froze the accounts of Jews and sold their assets, collaborating directly with Nazi seizure of Jewish property. This wasn’t done under duress. This was voluntary cooperation with Nazi policies in order to maintain banking relationships and access to European markets. The bank’s actions were documented in detail, but didn’t result in any significant consequences for executives after the war. The Bank for International Settlements continued functioning throughout World War II, serving as a financial clearing house that included both Allied and Axis central banks. The BIS facilitated the transfer of Nazi gold, including gold seized from Holocaust victims, converting it to currency that could be used in international transactions. The bank’s American and British board members continued attending meetings in neutral Switzerland throughout the war, sitting at the same table as their German and Italian counterparts. When this was exposed after the war, no one was prosecuted. The BIS was too important to the international financial system to be disrupted by questions about its wartime activities. By 1939, Germany owed substantial debts to American banks and corporations. But it also held enormous debts from Eastern European countries that had borrowed from German banks during the 1920s. Poland, Czechoslovakia, Romania, and other nations in Germany’s sphere had taken German loans during the Daws and Young Plan eras. Those debts were still outstanding. When Germany invaded Poland in September 1939, the military action had a financial dimension that most people don’t recognize. German conquest of Eastern Europe meant German control over those nations resources and the ability to extract payment on pre-existing debts. The standard historical narrative presents Hitler’s aggression as ideological driven by racial theories and desire for Laben’s realm, living space for Germans. That’s partially true, but it misses the economic logic that made aggression financially rational from the perspective of Germany’s creditors. If Germany conquered resourcerich territory, it could generate the revenue needed to pay its debts to American banks. If Germany collapsed economically, those loans would default. Military expansion was actually the solution that best served the interests of Germany’s international creditors. This explains something that otherwise makes no sense. Why did American banks continue extending credit to Nazi Germany even as Hitler’s aggressive intentions became obvious? Why did American corporations continue supplying the German military buildup throughout the 1930s? The answer is that creditors had a financial interest in Germany becoming powerful enough to extract wealth from Eastern Europe. A weak Germany couldn’t pay its debts. A strong Germany could loot enough resources to service its international obligations. The scale of plunder from occupied territories was massive and directly connected to debt service. When Germany occupied Poland, Czechoslovakia, France, and other nations, the German government imposed occupation costs that required these nations to pay for their own occupation. French payments alone totaled over 860 million marks annually, more than the cost of maintaining German occupation forces. This surplus didn’t go to improving conditions in occupied territories. It flowed to Berlin to service Germany’s international debts and fund further military operations. But the real financial transformation came with American entry into the war in 1941. Just as in World War I, American participation fundamentally changed the debt dynamics. The United States began extending massive loans to Britain and other allies through the lend lease program. By the war’s end, lend lease aid totaled over $50 billion, equivalent to roughly 700 billion today. Britain, which had entered the war as a creditor nation with an empire spanning the globe, would emerge as the world’s largest debtor, owing the United States amounts that would take decades to repay. The pattern from World War I repeated exactly. A European conflict created emergency borrowing needs that allowed American financial institutions to establish dominant creditor positions over nations that had previously been economic rivals. Every artillery shell fired, every tank produced, every bomber sent into the sky represented loan obligations that would outlast the military conflict by generations. The longer the war lasted, the more Europe borrowed from America. The more Europe borrowed, the more dominant America’s financial position became. In July 1944, with the war still raging, 730 delegates from 44 allied nations gathered at the Mount Washington Hotel in Bretonwoods, New Hampshire. The stated purpose was to establish a new international monetary system that would prevent future conflicts. The actual purpose was to formalize American financial dominance over the post-war world. The Breton Woods agreement established the US dollar as the world’s reserve currency, backed by gold at $35 per ounce. All other currencies would be pegged to the dollar. International trade would be conducted in dollars. The International Monetary Fund and World Bank, both headquartered in Washington, would manage international loans and development aid. Think about what this meant in practical terms. The United States emerged from World War II holding the majority of the world’s gold reserves, controlling the world’s reserve currency, and serving as the primary creditor for reconstruction. Europe and Japan, devastated by war, would need to borrow from American institutions to rebuild. Those loans would be denominated in dollars, creating permanent demand for American currency. The dollar’s role as reserve currency meant the United States could essentially print money to pay for imports, while other nations had to earn dollars through exports. America had achieved through World War II what Britain had lost through World War I, the ability to extract wealth from the global economy through control of the monetary system. The Marshall Plan, announced in 1947, extended $13 billion in aid to Western Europe for reconstruction. This is typically presented as American generosity, but the Marshall Plan was structured as loans, not grants, though the terms were favorable. European nations that accepted Marshall Plan aid also agreed to open their markets to American goods, provide preferential treatment to American investors, and align their foreign policies with American interests. The aid came with strings that established American economic dominance over Western Europe for decades. But here’s what really reveals the financial nature of the post-war order. Germany, the defeated aggressor whose debts had helped cause two world wars, was divided into occupation zones and subjected to reparations far less ownorous than those imposed at Versailles. Why? Because American policymakers had learned that crushing Germany with unpayable debts would create instability that threatened American investments. Instead, West Germany received Marshall Plan aid. Its debts were restructured on manageable terms, and it was rebuilt as an industrial power integrated into the Americanled economic system. East Germany under Soviet control was systematically looted and remained economically devastated for decades. The Bank for International Settlements, which had facilitated Nazi gold transactions throughout the war, continued operating after 1945 with minimal interruption. No one was prosecuted for its wartime activities. The institution was too useful. It provided a venue for central bank cooperation that operated above national laws and beyond democratic accountability. The BIS still exists today, still headquartered in Basil, still conducting meetings and transactions that aren’t subject to public oversight. The final reckoning of World War II debt took decades. Britain did not finish paying its lend lease obligations to the United States until 2006. Germany’s final reparations payment for World War I was made in 2010, 92 years after the armistice. But Germany’s World War II debts were largely forgiven or restructured, not because of moral considerations, but because creditors had learned that manageable debt was more profitable than unpayable debt. A debtor who can pay indefinitely is more valuable than a debtor who collapses and defaults. The Cold War that followed World War II was presented as an ideological conflict between capitalism and communism, democracy and totalitarianism. That’s the surface level explanation. The financial reality was that the Soviet Union represented an alternative economic system that did not rely on dollar denominated debt and American financial institutions. The entire Soviet block opted out of Breton Woods, the IMF, the World Bank, and the debt-based system that American banks controlled. The Cold War arms race served the same function as World War I and two. It created borrowing needs that established long-term financial obligations. The United States borrowed trillions to build nuclear weapons, maintain military bases worldwide, and fund proxy wars. The Soviet Union borrowed billions from Western banks to purchase technology and grain, creating debt dependencies that ultimately contributed to its collapse. When the USSR finally fell in 1991, it wasn’t conquered militarily. It went bankrupt. The Soviet system couldn’t sustain the debt burden of trying to match American military spending. The pattern established in 1919 and perfected by 1945 continues operating today. International conflicts create emergency borrowing situations that allow financial institutions to establish long-term control over national economic policies. The 2008 financial crisis caused by reckless lending by major banks resulted in those same banks receiving trillion dollar bailouts funded by taxpayer debt. The banks that created the crisis became more powerful and profitable after the crisis than they were before. The specific institutions that profited from World War II still dominate global finance today. JP Morgan Chase, the direct descendant of JP Morgan and company that financed both world wars, is the largest bank in America. Bank of America, Cityroup, and Wells Fargo, all with roots in wartime finance, control trillions in assets. The international monetary system still revolves around the dollar dominance established at Breton Woods. The IMF and World Bank still impose austerity policies on deter nations that prioritize creditor repayment over human welfare. When we look at current geopolitical tensions, the same patterns are visible. USChina competition isn’t primarily about ideology or human rights. It’s about which nation will control the international financial system. China holds over a trillion dollars in US government debt. The United States has used dollar dominance to impose financial sanctions that are more effective than military force. The next major conflict, whether economic or military, will reshape global debt relationships the same way World Wars one and two did. So, let’s connect all the pieces. World War I ended with Germany owing impossible debts that created economic instability. American banks restructured those debts in ways that gave them control over German finances. When the system collapsed in 1929, Hitler rose to power partly through funding from German industrialists who were receiving American loans. American corporations helped rebuild German military capacity between 1933 and 1939 while maintaining profitable business relationships. The Bank for International Settlements facilitated financial flows that included both Allied and Axis nations even during wartime. World War II served as a debt collection mechanism where German conquest of Eastern Europe allowed extraction of resources to service international obligations while Allied borrowing from American banks established permanent US financial dominance. The Bretton Wood system formalized American control over global finance. The Marshall Plan indebted Europe to the United States while opening European markets to American economic penetration. And the pattern has repeated through the Cold War, financial crisis, and current geopolitical tensions. Prescott Bush, whose bank had financed Nazi industrialists, went on to become a US senator. His son became president. His grandson became president. The banking and corporate executives who profited from Nazi Germany faced no prosecutions and no consequences. The institutions that facilitated Hitler’s rise remain the dominant forces in global finance today. This wasn’t failure or unfortunate coincidence. This was success. The system worked exactly as intended. Wars create debt. Debt creates control. Control creates profit. When you understand this pattern, modern events make more sense. Why do international conflicts consistently benefit the largest financial institutions? Why do emergency situations always result in increased government debt rather than decreased international tensions? Why do peace agreements always involve complex financial arrangements that seem more important than territorial or political agreements? The answer is that wars aren’t primarily fought over ideology, territory, or political disputes. They’re fought to establish and maintain the debt-based financial system that benefits creditors regardless of which side wins the military conflict. Those Nazi banners hanging in newsreel footage, those soldiers marching into Poland, those bombs falling on London, they weren’t just military operations. They were debt collection activities. Every bullet fired, every city destroyed, every life lost represented interest payments flowing to banks that had created the financial conditions, making war more profitable than peace. World War II didn’t happen because Hitler was evil, though he certainly was. It happened because unpaid World War I debts had created mathematical impossibility that could only be resolved through another massive conflict that would reset debt relationships and establish new financial hierarchies. We’re not living in a world shaped by the military outcomes of historical wars. We’re living in a world shaped by the financial arrangements that funded those wars. And more than any battlefield victory or ideological triumph or political settlement, that financial architecture explains why our current international system prioritizes debt service over human welfare, creditor rights over national sovereignty, and bank profits over democratic governance. The bankers triggered World War II. They collected their debts through 50 million deaths and were still paying interest on their victory. Experience Socialism

Welcome to the Conversation on Free Speech!

Welcome to Truly Right View!
We’re here to explore real, unfiltered truths—unswayed by media bias or government agendas.

What do you think? Are you ready to hear insights you won’t find elsewhere?
Subscribe to the Truly Right View YouTube Channel | Rumble Channel and join our community dedicated to open dialogue.

What Does Free Speech Mean to You?

In today’s world, where tech giants and news outlets hold so much influence, is free speech at risk?

From silencing certain viewpoints to heavy censorship, the freedom to speak without fear is under threat.

Tell us your thoughts:

Is free speech still a right everyone enjoys?
Do you think we’re protecting it well enough?

Let’s dive into the heart of this discussion. Add your voice below!

The Founding Fathers and Free Speech—Is This the Future They Envisioned?

The U.S. Constitution guarantees the right to free speech, yet today, we see more restrictions than ever in the name of “misinformation” and “hate speech.”

What do you think?